Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04755231
Other study ID # ILH297-C004
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 19, 2021
Est. completion date March 15, 2023

Study information

Verified date September 2023
Source Alcon Research
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective of this clinical study is to assess the clinical performance of the PanOptix IOL in a Chinese population.


Description:

In this clinical study, subjects will be implanted with the PanOptix IOL in both eyes. The second eye surgery will occur 7-28 days after the first eye. A total of 11 scheduled visits are planned, including a screening visit, two operative visits, and 8 postoperative visits. The total expected duration of the subject's participation will be about 14 months. This study will be conducted in China.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 181
Est. completion date March 15, 2023
Est. primary completion date August 31, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Key Inclusion Criteria: - Able to comprehend and sign an informed consent form; - Able to complete all study visits required in the protocol; - Chinese; diagnosed with cataracts in both eyes; - Planned bilateral cataract removal by routine phacoemulsification; - Pre-operative regular corneal astigmatism of less than 1.0 diopter (D); - Pre-operative best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) worse than or equal to 0.3 LogMAR in each eye; - Potential postoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 logMAR or better in both eyes based on the investigator expert medical opinion. - Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply. Key Exclusion Criteria: - Glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa and any pathologic changes associated with the optic nerve; - Clinically significant corneal diseases; - Clinically significant/severe dry eye that would affect study measurements based on the investigator's expert medical opinion; - Previous intraocular or corneal surgery; - Pregnancy or lactation during study or planning to be pregnant/lactating; - Systemic medications that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may confound the outcome or increase the risk to the subject; - Other planned ocular surgical procedures; - Patients who desire monovision correction. - Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Presbyopia Correcting IOL
UV and blue-light filtering foldable multifocal IOL with a +2.17 diopter (D) addition power of intermediate visual acuity and a +3.25 D addition power of near visual acuity. This device is approved in China.
Procedure:
Cataract surgery
Cataract extraction by phacoemulsification, followed by implantation of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix Presbyopia Correcting IOL

Locations

Country Name City State
China Beijing Tongren Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing
China Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Guandong
China The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou
China Peking University People's Hospital Peking
China Ophthalmic Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Shandong
China Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai
China Shanxi Eye Hospital Shanxi
China West China Hospital of Sichuan University Sichuan
China Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital Tianjin

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Alcon Research

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) Equal to or Better Than 0.3 LogMAR - Monocular Visual acuity (VA) was assessed monocularly (eyes individually) with best refractive correction in place under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 5 meters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) Equal to or Better Than 0.3 LogMAR - Binocular VA was assessed binocularly (eyes together) with best refractive correction in place under photopic conditions at a distance of 5 meters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) - Monocular Visual acuity (VA) was assessed monocularly (eyes individually) with best refractive correction in place under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 5 meters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) - Binocular VA was assessed binocularly (eyes together) with best refractive correction in place under photopic conditions at a distance of 5 meters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Mean Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) - Monocular VA was assessed monocularly (eyes individually) with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic conditions at a distance of 60 centimeters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Mean Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) - Binocular VA was assessed binocularly (eyes together) with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic conditions at a distance of 60 centimeters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Mean Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) - Monocular VA was assessed monocularly (eyes individually) with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic conditions at a distance of 40 centimeters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Mean Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) - Binocular VA was assessed binocularly (eyes together) with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic conditions at a distance of 40 centimeters using Chinese Standard Logarithmic VA charts. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Number of Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events An adverse event was defined as any adverse medical event that occurred during the clinical trial whether or not it was related to the investigational medical device or test procedure. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 12 (360-390 days post second eye surgery, 367-418 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Number of Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events An adverse event was defined as any adverse medical event that occurred during the clinical trial whether or not it was related to the investigational medical device or test procedure. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 12 (360-390 days post second eye surgery, 367-418 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Number of Secondary Surgical Interventions A secondary surgical intervention (SSI) was defined as a surgical procedure occurring after primary implantation of the IOL. Posterior capsulotomies were excluded from the definition of secondary surgical interventions. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 12 (360-390 days post second eye surgery, 367-418 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Number of Participants Reporting a Severe Visual Disturbance (QUVID) The Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire that collects responses about 7 vision-related experiences. For each experience, the participant was asked, "In the Past 7 Days, How Severe Was Your Worst Experience" and responded on a 5-point scale, where 0-4 scale, where 0=none, 1=a little, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery); Month 12 (360-390 days post second eye surgery, 367-418 days post first eye surgery)
Primary Number of Participants Reporting a Most Bothersome Visual Disturbance (QUVID) The Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire that collects responses about 7 vision-related experiences. For each experience, the participant was asked, "In the Past 7 Days, How Much Were You Bothered With" and responded on a 5-point scale, where 0=not bothered at all, 1=bothered a little, 2=bothered somewhat, 3=bothered quite a bit, and 4=bothered very much (most bothersome). No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. Month 6 (180-210 days post second eye surgery, 187-238 days post first eye surgery); Month 12 (360-390 days post second eye surgery, 367-418 days post first eye surgery)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05326607 - Pilot Clinical Investigation of Adaptative Eyeglasses for the Correction of Presbyopia N/A
Recruiting NCT06060041 - IC-8 Apthera IOL New Enrollment Post Approval Study
Completed NCT05495971 - Extended Depth of Focus Contact Lenses for Presbyopia N/A
Completed NCT05464732 - Vivity IOL: Emmetropia Compared to Monovision. N/A
Recruiting NCT06045299 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of LNZ101 and LNZ100 for the Presbyopia Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04151550 - Safety & Efficacy of the Laser Scleral Microporation Procedure (Philippines) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05506553 - Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision N/A
Completed NCT02554396 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of PRX-100 in the Treatment of Early to Moderate Presbyopia Phase 2
Completed NCT02214797 - Dispensing Study to Assess Visual Performance of Prototype Contact Lenses N/A
Completed NCT02235831 - DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Multifocal (MF) - Comparative Assessment of Visual Performance N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT01443585 - Clinical Evaluation of a Progressive Addition Lens (PAL) N/A
Completed NCT01591499 - Clinical Evaluation of Biofinity Multifocal Compared With Air Optix Aqua Multifocal and With PureVision Multifocal N/A
Completed NCT04983589 - A Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Age 40 to 55 With Presbyopia (Old Eye) Who Receive AGN-190584 in Both Eyes Twice Daily Phase 3
Completed NCT02740010 - The Visual Performances of a Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus
Recruiting NCT05796453 - Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study of Clareon Vivity & Clareon PanOptix N/A
Completed NCT02516306 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EV06 Ophthalmic Solution in Improving Vision in Subjects With Presbyopia Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT05359380 - The Impact of Light Conditions on the Efficacy of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Activities of Daily Living
Not yet recruiting NCT04522427 - Study of Presbyopia-correcting Intraocular Lenses in Eyes With Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03688425 - Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF in Asian Eyes N/A
Recruiting NCT06053463 - Evaluation of Soft Multifocal Lenses in Presbyopic Previous Contact Lens Wearers N/A