View clinical trials related to Presbyopia.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of the investigational lens in a Korean population, especially for visual performance, quality of vision, and subject satisfaction with the visual outcome, as well as the safety of the lens. This trial will be conducted in Korea.
This trial seeks to establish, using a randomized, controlled design, the impact of near eyesight correction on the productivity of presbyopic agricultural workers in India, as measured by weight of tea picked.
Patients who underwent presbyopic correction with bilateral trifocal intraocular lenses implantation are supposed to have sufficient uncorrected vision capacity for activities of daily living (ADLs) that require near vision acuity (NV), (ie. book reading). However, it is known that light intensity and temperature has a great impact on near vision capacity. Primary objective of this study is to identify the optimal task lighting conditions (in terms of light intensity and temperature) for ADLs that demand near vision acuity for a sample of patients who underwent presbyopic correction with bilateral trifocal intraocular lenses implantation
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PRX-100 compared with aceclidine alone and vehicle in the treatment of early to moderate presbyopia.
The purpose of this study is to compare an alternative fitting guide to a current fitting guide for optimizing contact lens parameters and determining contact lens prescription.
Since the introduction of intraocular lenses (IOL) in the treatment of cataract, the postoperative accommodative loss of the human eye has been a trending topic. Numerous studies show a high rate of spectacle-independency after bilateral implantation of multifocal IOLs (MIOL). However, glare, halos, and reduced visual acuity under different light conditions are common complaints after MIOL implantation. Due to its unique design, the TECNIS® Symfony Extended Range of Vision ZXR00 IOL (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, USA, hereinafter referred to as Symfony IOL) is theoretically providing a continuous range of high-quality vision for far, intermediate, and near distances with the same low incidence of halos and glare associated with monofocal IOLs under different light conditions. The goal of this study is to compare the AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany, hereinafter referred to as AT LISA IOL) versus the Symfony IOL in terms of postoperative achieved visual acuity at different distances, patient satisfaction (e.g. spectacle-independency, QoL), and postoperative complication profile (e.g. halo's and glare) under different light conditions. So far, there are no published studies comparing both IOLs. Therefore, we will perform this randomized control trial.
Patients who underwent presbyopic correction with bilateral bifocal intraocular lenses implantation are supposed to have sufficient uncorrected vision capacity for activities of daily living (ADLs) that require near vision acuity (NV), (ie. book reading). However, it is known that light intensity and temperature has a great impact on near vision capacity. Primary objective of this study is to identify the optimal task lighting conditions (in terms of light intensity and temperature) for ADLs that demand near vision acuity for a sample oa patients who underwent presbyopic correction with bilateral bifocal intraocular lenses implantation
Demand in near vision correction in the community exist in the Bangladesh with a thin presence of eye- care. This study aimed to test the skill of BRAC service-providers in identifying presbyopia-cases, to ensure frequent services, meeting the community need. This was non-inferiority equivalence randomized intervention trial, done during February-June 2015, in six randomly selected sub-districts, where 2059 camp-patients were screened. BRAC Health-cadres; program organizers (PO), upgraded shasthya- shebikas (USS) and shasthya- shebikas (SS), were assigned to three different arms consisting two sub-districts through permuted-block randomization.105 eye-camps were organized with minimum 500 sample per arm. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated to understand screening performance. Screening reports were matched with the gold standard by recruiting refractionists.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate CLEAR CARE® PLUS (CCP) compared to non-HYDRAGLYDE® multi-purpose contact lens solutions in presbyopes currently wearing soft contact lenses and experiencing symptoms of dryness.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate OPTI-FREE® PureMoist® (OFPM) compared to non-HYDRAGLYDE® multi-purpose contact lens solutions in presbyopes currently wearing soft contact lenses and experiencing symptoms of dryness.