Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06207344
Other study ID # 2023.159
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 21, 2023
Est. completion date June 30, 2025

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Contact Yu Chen
Phone 8602362887913
Email cypgxhcj@tom.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In one-lung ventilation surgery, compared with dexmedetomidine combined with propofol, dexmedetomidine combined with desflurane may be beneficial to accelerate patients' recovery and reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and does not increase the incidences of delirium and postoperative nausea and vomiting.


Description:

With the increase in the prevalence of lung cancer in recent years, the number of patients undergoing lobectomy has also increased. When performing lobectomy, inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial occlusive device and then ventilating the healthy lung is necessary. The affected lung is not ventilated; that is one-lung ventilation, which can fully expose the vision of the affected lung, provide space for surgical operation, and simultaneously avoid the pollution of the healthy lung. The emergence of one-lung ventilation has extensively promoted the development of thoracic surgery. However, during one-lung ventilation, the affected lung is not ventilated, and the blood flow of the affected lung is not oxygenated, which leads to increased intrapulmonary shunt and hypoxemia. Repeated and excessive inflation of the healthy lung may release many inflammatory factors, trigger local or systemic inflammatory reactions, and increase postoperative pulmonary complications. Therefore, it is an essential goal of anesthesia management to quickly wake up and resume spontaneous breathing to reduce mechanical ventilation time. Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane, or desflurane are clinics' most commonly used general anesthesia methods. It is found that inhalation anesthesia with desflurane is superior to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia in the aspects of eye-opening time, spontaneous breathing recovery time, and extubation time in outpatient surgery, lung volume reduction surgery, lung cancer surgery, and endoscopic lumbar disc surgery. In addition, several meta-analyses found that inhalation anesthesia has an anti-inflammatory effect compared with propofol-based anesthesia, which can reduce alveolar inflammatory reaction and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with one-lung ventilation. Kawanishi et al. found that desflurane inhalation anesthesia can promote the collapse of the affected lung, shorten the operation time, and reduce the occurrence of atelectasis compared with propofol-based intravenous anesthesia. These studies show that inhalation anesthesia with desflurane is superior to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia in one-lung ventilation surgery. However, inhalation anesthesia is not perfect, and studies have also found that inhalation anesthesia increases the incidences of restlessness during awakening and postoperative nausea and vomiting. One study found that the incidences of delirium, nausea and vomiting in the desflurane anesthesia group were 50% and 37.5% respectively, while that in the propofol-based intravenous anesthesia group was 10% and 17.5% respectively in lung cancer surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to explore an anesthesia management method that will not affect the advantages of inhalation anesthesia but also reduce the disadvantages of inhalation anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2- adrenergic receptor agonist. Its primary function is sedation, often used as an anesthetic adjuvant. Studies have found that dexmedetomidine can significantly reduce the incidences of delirium during recovery and postoperative nausea and vomiting. In patients undergoing nasal surgery, dexmedetomidine can reduce the incidence of delirium in patients receiving desflurane anesthesia from 52.8% to 5.6%, even lower than the incidence of delirium (10%) in patients receiving propofol in lung cancer surgery. In patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy, the use of dexmedetomidine can reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after desflurane anesthesia from 32% to 13%, even lower than that after propofol anesthesia in lung cancer surgery (17.5%). In addition, dexmedetomidine can reduce inflammatory reactions, improve oxidative stress and respiratory mechanics, reduce intrapulmonary shunt, improve oxygenation, and reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in one-lung ventilation surgery. Although dexmedetomidine has a sedative effect, this sedative effect can be awakened easily. Moreover, a meta-analysis found that dexmedetomidine did not prolong the stay time in the anesthesia recovery room but only prolonged extubation time statistically, and it had no clinical significance. In a word, a large number of meta-analyses found that dexmedetomidine can not only reduce the incidence of various adverse events after operation but also has no noticeable effect on patients' recovery. Therefore, the investigators speculate that compared with dexmedetomidine combined with propofol, dexmedetomidine combined with desflurane is beneficial to accelerate patients' recovery and reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and does not increase the incidences of delirium and postoperative nausea and vomiting.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 120
Est. completion date June 30, 2025
Est. primary completion date December 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic unilateral lobectomy. 2. General anesthesia is required and the expected duration of one-lung ventilation is = 1h. 3. American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical condition classification I-III. 4. Patients over 18 years old. 5. Voluntary participation and ability to understand and sign the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Obese patients (BMI>28 kg/m2). 2. patients with grade 3 hypertension (systolic blood pressure =180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure =110 mmHg). 3. Acute coronary syndrome, sinus bradycardia (heart rate < 45 beats/min), II or III degree atrioventricular block, NYHA heart function classification III or IV. 4. Patients with severe history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD grade III or IV of pulmonary function of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), severe or uncontrolled bronchial asthma, pulmonary infection, bronchiectasis and thoracic deformity. 5. Pulmonary artery pressure =60 mmHg. 6. Patients with Child grade B or C of liver function. 7. Patients with chronic kidney disease in stage 4 or 5. 8. Patients with hyperthyroidism and pheochromocytoma. 9. Patients who are expected to need mechanical ventilation after operation. 10. People with hearing, intelligence, communication and cognitive impairment. 11. For any reason, it is impossible to cooperate with the study or the researcher thinks that it is not suitable to be included in this experiment. 12. patients who are expected to be transferred to ICU after operation.

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Dexmedetomidine and propofol
Group 1: After anesthesia induction, dexmedetomidine was infused at 1 µg/kg intravenously within 15 min, then infused at 0.3 µg/kg/h until 30 min before the end of the operation. Meantime, propofol was infused at 4-12mg/kg/h intravenously to maintain the depth of anesthesia.
Dexmedetomidine and desflurane
Group 2: After anesthesia induction, dexmedetomidine was infused at 1 µg/kg intravenously within 15 min, then infused at 0.3 µg/kg/h until 30 min before the end of the operation. At the same time, 2.5%-8.5% desflurane was inhaled to maintain the depth of anesthesia.

Locations

Country Name City State
China The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing Chongqing
China The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing Chongqing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (10)

Abe K, Shimizu T, Takashina M, Shiozaki H, Yoshiya I. The effects of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 1998 Nov;87(5):1164-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199811000-00035. — View Citation

Bernasconi F, Piccioni F. One-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery: current perspectives. Tumori. 2017 Nov 23;103(6):495-503. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000638. Epub 2017 Jun 7. — View Citation

Campos JH, Feider A. Hypoxia During One-Lung Ventilation-A Review and Update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Oct;32(5):2330-2338. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 19. No abstract available. — View Citation

Cho YJ, Kim TK, Hong DM, Seo JH, Bahk JH, Jeon Y. Effect of desflurane-remifentanil vs. Propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 18;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0302-x. — View Citation

Jannu V, Dhorigol MG. Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain and Pulmonary Function Following Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):68-71. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_9_20. Epub 2020 Mar 16. — View Citation

Jiang H, Kang Y, Ge C, Zhang Z, Xie Y. One-lung ventilation patients: Clinical context of administration of different doses of dexmedetomidine. J Med Biochem. 2022 Apr 8;41(2):230-237. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-33870. — View Citation

Karzai W, Haberstroh J, Priebe HJ. Effects of desflurane and propofol on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in the pig. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jul;42(6):648-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05296.x. — View Citation

Kawanishi R, Kakuta N, Sakai Y, Hari Y, Sasaki H, Sekiguchi R, Tanaka K. Desflurane improves lung collapse more than propofol during one-lung ventilation and reduces operation time in lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01669-7. — View Citation

Xia R, Xu J, Yin H, Wu H, Xia Z, Zhou D, Xia ZY, Zhang L, Li H, Xiao X. Intravenous Infusion of Dexmedetomidine Combined Isoflurane Inhalation Reduces Oxidative Stress and Potentiates Hypoxia Pulmonary Vasoconstriction during One-Lung Ventilation in Patients. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:238041. doi: 10.1155/2015/238041. Epub 2015 Jul 26. — View Citation

Yuan JL, Kang K, Li B, Lu J, Miao MR, Kang X, Zhang JQ, Zhang W. The Effects of Sevoflurane vs. Propofol for Inflammatory Responses in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Surg. 2021 Jul 2;8:692734. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.692734. eCollection 2021. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Time to open eyes after anesthetics withdrawal The first time to open eyes after anesthetics withdrawal. From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the first time of the patient open his or her eyes, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Incidence of delirium The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) will be used to assess the incidence of delirium. RASS is a 10-point scale, with four levels of anxiety or agitation (+1 to +4 [combative]), one level to denote a calm and alert state (0), and 5 levels of sedation (-1 to -5) culminating in unarousable (-5). The scores of +2, +3, and +4 are defined as delirium. From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient leaving the postanesthesia care unit, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Incidence of nausea and vomiting The severity of nausea and vomiting will be evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS): a 10 cm ruler was used as a scale, one end (0 points) indicated no nausea and vomiting, and the other end was 10 cm, indicating the most severe nausea and vomiting that was unbearable (1~4 was mild, 5~6 was moderate, and 7~10 was severe). From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient leaving the postanesthesia care unit, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Pain level Numeric Rating Scale will be used to assess the degree of pain. 0~10 is used to represent different degrees of pain: 0 is no pain, 1~3 is mild pain (the pain does not affect sleep), 4~6 is moderate pain (mildly affects sleep), 7~9 is severe pain (unable to fall asleep or wakes up from sleep), and 10 is severe pain. From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient leaving the postanesthesia care unit, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Incidences of other side effects Any unquestioned side effects will be recorded, such non-planned intensive care unit transfer, unplanned reoperation, unplanned reintubation, etc. From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient leaving the postanesthesia care unit, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Drugs and their dosage These drugs and their dosage will be recorded, such as muscle relaxant antagonism, antiemetic drugs, and analgesic drugs. From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient leaving the postanesthesia care unit, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary QoR-40 scores QoR-40 scores will be used to assess the quality of recovery. The questionnaire consists of five subscales: emotional status (9 items), physical comfort (12 items), psychological support (7 items), physical independence (5 items), and pain (7 items). All the items are rated on a five-point scale ranging from 1 to 5. The initial point and conversion score of each item are calculated. Depending on the question, the best answers may have a score of either 5 or 1. The best answers to positive questions are scored 5, while the best answers to negative questions are assigned the score of 1. The total score of QoR-40 is given by the summation of scores for all items and ranges from 40 to 200. The higher the score, the better is the health status.Citation Postoperative day 1 and 3.
Secondary Postoperative pulmonary complications The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was assessed according to the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) definition. The severity of postoperative pulmonary complications was scored on a 0-5 scale. First 7 postoperative days
Secondary White blood cell count White blood cell count will be used to assess the inflammatory level. Postoperative day 1 and 3.
Secondary Neutrophil ratio Neutrophil ratio will be used to assess the inflammatory level. Postoperative day 1 and 3.
Secondary Lymphocyte ratio Lymphocyte ratio will be used to assess the inflammatory level. Postoperative day 1 and 3.
Secondary C-reactive protein C-reactive protein will be used to assess the inflammatory level. Postoperative day 1 and 3.
Secondary Time for tidal volume of spontaneous breathing over 300 ml Time from anesthetics withdrawal to tidal volume of spontaneous breathing over 300 ml. From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient tidal volume of spontaneous breathing over 300 ml, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Extubation time Time from anesthetics withdrawal to extubation From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the tracheal tube was extubated, assessed up to 2 hour.
Secondary Postanesthesia care unit residence time Time of staying in postanesthesia care unit From time of anesthetic withdrawal to the patient leaving the postanesthesia care unit, assessed up to 2 hour.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03181620 - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation N/A
Recruiting NCT04205058 - Coffee After Pancreatic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT06425601 - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy N/A
Completed NCT02565420 - Saline Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution: The SOLAR Fluid Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04519593 - ABSOLUTELY: A Temporary Uterine Blood Supply Occlusion for Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Patients With UTErine LeiomYoma N/A
Completed NCT03662672 - Rib Raising for Post-operative Ileus N/A
Completed NCT03787849 - Epigenetics in PostOperative Pediatric Emergence Delirium N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05886387 - a Bayesian Analysis of Three Randomised Clinical Trials of Intraoperative Ventilation
Not yet recruiting NCT06351475 - Efficacy of Intraoperative Use of 20% Albumin Combined With Ringer Lactate Versus Ringer Lactate During Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05052021 - The South African Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) Surgical Outcomes Study
Not yet recruiting NCT03639012 - Outcomes of Carbohydrate Loading Paediatric Patients Preoperatively for Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03591432 - A Trial Comparing Transnasal humidified Rapid insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) and Apneic Oxygenation With Facemask Ventilation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Induction of Anaesthesia. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03275324 - Use of Integrated Pulmonary Index to Predict Post-Operative Respiratory Adverse Events in High Risk Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT02763878 - Uncut Roux-en-y Anastomosis Reduce Postoperative Complication and Improve Nutritional Status After Distal Gastrectomy Phase 3
Completed NCT02947789 - Predictive Model for Postoperative Mortality N/A
Completed NCT02891187 - Visits Versus Telephone Calls for Postoperative Care N/A
Completed NCT02766062 - Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Early POCD in Elderly Patients With Metabolic Syndrome N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02542423 - Endocan Predictive Value in Postcardiac Surgery Acute Respiratory Failure. N/A
Recruiting NCT01934049 - Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Hemi-arthroplasty Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT01744938 - Preoperative Biliary Drainage for the Lower Malignant Obstructive Jaundice Phase 3