Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06022081
Other study ID # 5854
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 27, 2023
Est. completion date September 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Contact Jacobo Moreno Garijo, MD
Phone 416-480-4864
Email jacobo.morenogarijo@sunnybrook.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center annually provides assistance to approximately 600 cardiac surgeries and 1500 trauma patients, many of whom require chest tubes to prevent blood and fluids from accumulating in the pleural cavities surrounding the heart. During the removal of chest tubes, there is a risk of air leaking into these cavities, leading to pneumothorax, a critical condition occurring in approximately 5-26% of cases, associated with increased complications and mortality. Currently, the diagnosis of pneumothorax is primarily based on chest X-rays (CXR), despite their limitations and low reliability. As an alternative method, lung ultrasound (LUS) offers several advantages: it is safer, less expensive, and less painful for patients compared to CXR. However, there is a lack of comparative data on the accuracy and interrater reliability of these two diagnostic approaches after chest tube removal. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of lung ultrasound performed by medical trainees in diagnosing pneumothorax in cardiac and trauma patients. By comparing LUS to CXR, the investigators seek to determine if LUS provides a more reliable and precise diagnosis. This study has the potential to enhance patient care by establishing a more effective and accessible method for diagnosing pneumothorax post-chest tube removal.


Description:

Diagnosing and promptly treating pneumothorax (PNX) is critical, as it is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay for patients. Following cardiac surgery, timely identification of PNX is particularly vital due to patients' reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, which can rapidly lead to life-threatening situations. While computed tomography (CT) is highly accurate in diagnosing PNX, its routine use for screening is impractical due to high radiation exposure, cost, and limited availability. Currently, the standard method for PNX detection is chest X-ray (CXR), but its reliability is suboptimal, resulting in potential misdiagnoses and delays in patient care. An alternate method for detecting PNX is using lung ultrasound (LUS). LUS is safe, portable compared to CXR, has the potential for faster results and higher accuracy relative to CXR. LUS can also be carried out by appropriate trained nurses and medical trainees, instead of requiring an expert radiographer. This prospective, single-center, observational, cross-sectional, cohort, feasibility pilot trial assesses trainee-performed bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) for detecting PNX and testing feasibility for a multicenter observational prospective study. The investigators will also compare PNX detection using LUS by novices compared to experts, interrater reliability and the time required from chest/mediastinal tube removal to diagnostic report for LUS. All participants will undergo assessment for PNX using both LUS and CXR completed independently (by study-trained critical care nurse/surgical trainee or an expert radiologist, respectively) and results will be compared between the two modalities. The successful implementation of LUS could lead to streamlined patient care and improved outcomes for cardiac surgery and trauma patients.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date September 2025
Est. primary completion date November 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age = 18 years old. - Cardiac and trauma patients who have had a chest/mediastinal tube removed within the past two hours in the CVICU, trauma bay, or ward. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who had a PNX prior to mediastinal chest tube removal that required intervention. - Patients on mechanical ventilation. - Patients with subcutaneous emphysema due to impaired pleural line visualization.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Lung ultrasound to detect pneumothorax.
Within a maximum of two hours after chest tube removal, the sonographic exam will be performed with an ultrasound device to assess residual PNX using a portable ultrasound device. The examination will require patients to lie face upward and will be performed at three different sites on both sides of the patient's chest. Each chest site will be imaged for approximately 10-20 seconds, allowing a complete examination of each side in approximately 30-60 seconds. The total study time for the LUS exam is approximately 2 minutes. The results of this assessment will be compared to the standard chest x-ray performed by a radiologist who is unaware of the study.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Sunnybrook Health Science Centre Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (10)

Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Feliciano DV. The occult pneumothorax: what have we learned? Can J Surg. 2009 Oct;52(5):E173-9. — View Citation

Bell RL, Ovadia P, Abdullah F, Spector S, Rabinovici R. Chest tube removal: end-inspiration or end-expiration? J Trauma. 2001 Apr;50(4):674-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200104000-00013. — View Citation

Diaz R, Patel KB, Almeida P, Shekar SP, Hernandez F, Mehta JP. Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? Cureus. 2020 Mar 20;12(3):e7339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7339. — View Citation

Eisenberg RL, Khabbaz KR. Are chest radiographs routinely indicated after chest tube removal following cardiac surgery? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):122-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5856. — View Citation

Galbois A, Ait-Oufella H, Baudel JL, Kofman T, Bottero J, Viennot S, Rabate C, Jabbouri S, Bouzeman A, Guidet B, Offenstadt G, Maury E. Pleural ultrasound compared with chest radiographic detection of pneumothorax resolution after drainage. Chest. 2010 Sep;138(3):648-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2224. Epub 2010 Apr 9. — View Citation

Goodman MD, Huber NL, Johannigman JA, Pritts TA. Omission of routine chest x-ray after chest tube removal is safe in selected trauma patients. Am J Surg. 2010 Feb;199(2):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.03.011. — View Citation

Khan T, Chawla G, Daniel R, Swamy M, Dimitri WR. Is routine chest X-ray following mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery useful? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Sep;34(3):542-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 9. — View Citation

McCormick JT, O'Mara MS, Papasavas PK, Caushaj PF. The use of routine chest X-ray films after chest tube removal in postoperative cardiac patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Dec;74(6):2161-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03982-6. — View Citation

Pacharn P, Heller DN, Kammen BF, Bryce TJ, Reddy MV, Bailey RA, Brasch RC. Are chest radiographs routinely necessary following thoracostomy tube removal? Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Feb;32(2):138-42. doi: 10.1007/s00247-001-0591-5. Epub 2001 Nov 24. — View Citation

Tocino IM, Miller MH, Fairfax WR. Distribution of pneumothorax in the supine and semirecumbent critically ill adult. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 May;144(5):901-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.5.901. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Recruitment rate The total number of participants recruited during the pilot trial. Target: 60 participants. 12 months (full pilot trial)
Primary Adherence to LUS Scan Protocol The proportion of participants who receive the LUS scans as per the trial protocol. This will be assessed by checking the frequency of LUS scans conducted for each participant against the planned frequency in the protocol. Measurement Tool: Frequency count of LUS scans against planned protocol scans. 12 months (full pilot trial)
Primary Feasibility of Accurate LUS Data Collection for Comparison with Chest X-rays Evaluate the feasibility of obtaining accurate LUS data suitable for comparison against Chest X-rays. The accuracy of LUS scans will be determined by the clarity and consistency of recorded data points. For the purpose of this study, 'accuracy' will be defined by a set of criteria based on sonographic signs of pneumothorax that include: absence of lung sliding, absence of B lines, presence of lung point, and absence of lung pulse. The primary outcome will be the proportion of LUS scans that meet this accuracy threshold. Measurement Tool: Qualitative assessment criteria tailored for this study. LUS scans will be evaluated based on clarity, consistency of recorded data points, and adherence to the sonographic signs of pneumothorax as listed above. The results from LUS will then be prepared for comparison against Chest X-ray findings in subsequent analyses. 12 months (full pilot trial)
Secondary Compare novice-performed LUS with CXR reports performed by experienced radiologists. The results of the assessments will be analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of pneumothorax detection by novices compared to experts. 12 months (full pilot trial)
Secondary Diagnostic accuracy of LUS vs CXR Assess diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of PNX detection by CXR and LUS (80% interrater reliability with the results when LUS is adjudicated by an expert for detecting PNX post-chest/mediastinal tube removal). 12 months (full pilot trial)
Secondary Diagnostic Sensitivity of CXR vs LUS Assess diagnostic sensitivity of PNX detection by CXR and LUS (80% interrater reliability with the results when LUS is adjudicated by an expert for detecting PNX post-chest/mediastinal tube removal). 12 months (full pilot trial)
Secondary Interrater reliability Assess the interrater reliability of novice and expert sonographers. 12 months (full pilot trial)
Secondary Time Required Assess the time required from chest/mediastinal tube removal to diagnostic report for LUS vs CXR. 12 months (full pilot trial)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02907866 - Use of Endobronchial Ultrasound Scope (EBUS) Transducer to Identify Pneumothorax-A Feasibility Study
Terminated NCT03034421 - Prevention of Pneumothorax Following Endoscopic Valve Therapy in Patients With Severe Emphysema N/A
Completed NCT02232841 - Electrical Impedance Imaging of Patients on Mechanical Ventilation N/A
Completed NCT02619591 - Comparison Of Chest Ultrasound Techniques To Identify Clinically Significant Pneumothorax N/A
Recruiting NCT05342675 - Effect of Rapid Rollover on Pneumothorax After CT-Guided Lung Biopsy N/A
Recruiting NCT05910112 - Prospective Data Collection on Clinical, Radiological and Patient Reported Outcomes After Pleural Intervention
Completed NCT03656406 - Effect of Lateral Positioning on Bronchial Cuff Pressure of Left-sided Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube During Thoracic Surgery
Active, not recruiting NCT06075836 - AI Assisted Detection of Chest X-Rays
Recruiting NCT03728491 - Education and Training Competences in Thoracic Ultrasound N/A
Recruiting NCT05407974 - Pleurectomy Versus Pleural Abrasion in Patients With Spontaneous Pneumothorax N/A
Completed NCT01670942 - Hypobaria and Traumatic Pneumothorax N/A
Terminated NCT00969423 - Chronic Pain After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Surgery for Pneumothorax N/A
Completed NCT05904574 - Effectiveness of the Autologous Blood Patch Method in Lung Biopsies
Completed NCT03327688 - Point-of-care Ultrasound in Finland N/A
Completed NCT05963945 - Multi-Reader Retrospective Study Examining Carebot AI CXR 2.0.21-v2.01 Implementation in Everyday Radiology Clinical Practice
Completed NCT05222568 - Effect of the Minimum Bronchial Cuff Volume of Left-sided Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube for One-lung Ventilation on the Change of the Bronchial Cuff Pressure During Lateral Positioning in Thoracic Surgery
Not yet recruiting NCT05121233 - Local Anesthesia Versus Combined Local Anesthesia With Single Dose Analgesia on Pain Control During Thoracic Ultrasound Guided Procedures Phase 4
Completed NCT03064659 - Driving Pressure And EFL in Adult Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT02090205 - Mechanical Ventilation During Cardiac Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01855464 - Wedge Resection or Parietal Pleurectomy for the Treatment of Recurrent Pneumothorax (WOPP) N/A