Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04630301
Other study ID # IRB00256185
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 17, 2021
Est. completion date December 20, 2024

Study information

Verified date December 2023
Source Johns Hopkins University
Contact David Feller-Kopman, MD
Phone 4105027046
Email dfk@jhmi.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Intrapleural pressures have been shown to be a useful clinical predictor in pleural effusions, however it's utility has not been described in pneumothorax. Data on intrapleural pressures in pneumothorax are limited. Furthermore, the pleural pressure in tension pneumothorax is theorized to be greater than atmospheric pressure, though this has never been verified. Pneumothorax is primarily treated with a tube thoracostomy. This observational study will record intrapleural pressures in participants with pneumothorax undergoing a tube thoracostomy. Clinical outcomes of participants will then be monitored for need for pleurodesis, intrabronchial valve placement, and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to identify a correlation with intrapleural pressure.


Description:

The rate of hospitalization for spontaneous pneumothorax among people age 14 or older is approximately 227 per million. Spontaneous pneumothorax in the absence of trauma can be further classified as primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) based on the absence or presence of underlying structural lung disease, respectively. Though recent studies suggest that in some cases conservative management with close observation is an acceptable treatment, definitive evacuation remains a cornerstone of management for patients who are symptomatic or who have a large pneumothorax. Intrapleural air can be removed by either needle aspiration or introduction of a watersealed catheter into the pleural space. In the event of tension pneumothorax (TP), emergent chest thoracostomy is preferred. In all cases, the goal of treatment remains to re-expand the affected lung, after which the catheter may be removed. If the visceral pleural defect is not healed after 5 days, it is deemed a persistent air leak. In these cases, the chest tube is maintained and more aggressive measures such as pleurodesis, placement of an intrabronchial valve (IBV), or VATS are performed. Unfortunately, there is currently no method to predict which patients will require these more invasive procedures. The lack of prognostic indicators is not the case in pleural effusions, however. Pleural manometry has been shown to be a useful tool in the management of patients with effusions. Doelken et al. described using an overdamped water manometer or an electronic transducer connected to a thoracentesis catheter for the direct measurement of Ppl with similar accuracy. Traditionally, thoracenteses are aborted after onset of dyspnea or cough, all fluid is drained, or 1 liter of fluid has been removed. This 1 liter limit exists to avoid the feared complicated of reexpansion pulmonary edema. However, monitoring of Ppl during drainage and aborting the procedure once Ppl drops below -20 cmH2O allows for safe drainage of often larger volumes. - Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that Ppl could diagnose non-expandable lung and predict pleurodesis failure in patients with malignant effusion. We recently reported the use of a simple, in-line, digital manometer to measure Ppl in patients with pleural effusion. Routine use of pleural manometry in the evaluation and management of pneumothorax has not yet been adopted, likely due to the historical difficulty in obtaining measurements and the uncertain clinical benefit pleural manometry provided. It has been found that Ppl in spontaneous pneumothorax was greater in patients that required prolonged drainage. These results were later supported in a study that demonstrated the practicality of measuring Ppl in pneumothorax. Ppl measurements required only up to 30 seconds by using an electronic manometer connected to an intrapleural catheter. Still to date, Ppl in TP have yet to be reported. Ultimately, measurement of Ppl in pneumothorax may help identify patients at increased risk for the need of advanced therapies such as IBV placement, pleurodesis, or VATS. Early identification of these high-risk patients will allow for these interventions to be performed earlier, thus reducing hospital length of stay, associated complications, and health-care costs. 4. Study Procedures 1. Patients admitted to the Johns Hopkins Hospital with spontaneous, iatrogenic, or tension pneumothorax referred to the Division of Interventional Pulmonology for thoracostomy will be recruited. Using standard sterile technique, a 14fr catheter will be inserted into the pleural space. An electronic manometer (Compass, Medline Industries, Inc.) will be connected in-line to the introducer needle and Ppl will be recorded for 3-5 respiratory cycles. After measurement, the manometer will be removed and the catheter will remain in place per routine standards of practice. Outcome data of patients will be collected including duration of chest tube placement, need for pleurodesis, IBV, and referral for VATS. Patient data will be de-identified and stored on the a Johns Hopkins secured (SAFE) desktop. A separate file will also be kept on the SAFE desktop that contains participant Medical Record Numbers to allow for matching of Ppl measurements with clinical outcomes. Once outcome data is collected for a participant, the participant's identifiable information will be removed. A combined waiver of consent and oral consent process will be used. The waiver of consent will allow performance of chest tube placement and the collection of pressure measurements via the manometer without the consent of potential subjects. Subsequently, an oral consent process will be used to invite potential subjects to enroll in the study and to get consent for the use of the pressure data already collected as well as for further data collection from the patients' medical records. 2. No biospecimens will be collected. 3. Patients will be enrolled over the course of 1 year. The study will not impact length of hospitalization. 4. This is a nonblinded study. 5. Patients will continue to receive standard of care treatments. This study may delay catheter placement by mere seconds to accommodate for Ppl measurements, this delay is negligible and 6. will not impact clinical outcomes as even in the case of tension the pleural air will be evacuated via the introducer needle. 7. This study does not include a placebo group. 8. Participant removal criteria include pneumothorax in which Ppl cannot be reliably measured within 30 seconds. 9. Participants removed from the study will continue to receive standard-of-care treatment.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 125
Est. completion date December 20, 2024
Est. primary completion date December 20, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - patients aged 18 or older admitted to the Johns Hopkins Hospital with clinical or radiographic evidence of new pneumothorax who are referred to Interventional Pulmonology for needle aspiration or tube thoracostomy. TP will be defined as a pneumothorax that results in mean arterial pressure <65 or systolic BP < 90. Exclusion Criteria: - bilateral pneumothorax

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Johns Hopkins University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (11)

Bobbio A, Dechartres A, Bouam S, Damotte D, Rabbat A, Regnard JF, Roche N, Alifano M. Epidemiology of spontaneous pneumothorax: gender-related differences. Thorax. 2015 Jul;70(7):653-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206577. Epub 2015 Apr 27. — View Citation

Brown SGA, Ball EL, Perrin K, Asha SE, Braithwaite I, Egerton-Warburton D, Jones PG, Keijzers G, Kinnear FB, Kwan BCH, Lam KV, Lee YCG, Nowitz M, Read CA, Simpson G, Smith JA, Summers QA, Weatherall M, Beasley R; PSP Investigators. Conservative versus Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 30;382(5):405-415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910775. — View Citation

Doelken P, Huggins JT, Pastis NJ, Sahn SA. Pleural manometry: technique and clinical implications. Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1764-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1764. — View Citation

Feller-Kopman D, Berkowitz D, Boiselle P, Ernst A. Large-volume thoracentesis and the risk of reexpansion pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Nov;84(5):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.038. — View Citation

Herrejon A, Inchaurraga I, Vivas C, Custardoy J, Marin J. Initial pleural pressure measurement in spontaneous pneumothorax. Lung. 2000;178(5):309-16. doi: 10.1007/s004080000034. — View Citation

Kaneda H, Nakano T, Murakawa T. Measurement of intrapleural pressure in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax: a pilot study. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-1038-9. — View Citation

Lan RS, Lo SK, Chuang ML, Yang CT, Tsao TC, Lee CH. Elastance of the pleural space: a predictor for the outcome of pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusion. Ann Intern Med. 1997 May 15;126(10):768-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-10-199705150-00003. — View Citation

Lee HJ, Yarmus L, Kidd D, Amador RO, Akulian J, Gilbert C, Hughes A, Thompson RE, Arias S, Feller-Kopman D. Comparison of pleural pressure measuring instruments. Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):1007-1012. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-3004. — View Citation

Light RW, Jenkinson SG, Minh VD, George RB. Observations on pleural fluid pressures as fluid is withdrawn during thoracentesis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 May;121(5):799-804. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.5.799. — View Citation

MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii18-31. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136986. No abstract available. — View Citation

Sahn SA, Heffner JE. Spontaneous pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 23;342(12):868-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003233421207. No abstract available. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pleural pressure (Ppl) prior to evacuation of pleural air Ppl is reported in centimeters of water (cmH2O) Upon needle insertion into the pleural space and for 5 breath cycles, up to 60 seconds
Secondary Duration (days) of chest tube placement Number of days that chest tube is in place. Up to 30 days
Secondary Referral for pleurodesis Was the patient referred for pleurodesis (yes/no). Up to 30 days
Secondary Intrabronchial valve (IBV) placement Was the patient treated with an intrabronchial valve (yes/no). Up to 30 days
Secondary Referral for video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) Was the patient referred for video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (yes/no). Up to 30 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06022081 - Lung Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography for Detection of Pneumothorax N/A
Recruiting NCT02907866 - Use of Endobronchial Ultrasound Scope (EBUS) Transducer to Identify Pneumothorax-A Feasibility Study
Terminated NCT03034421 - Prevention of Pneumothorax Following Endoscopic Valve Therapy in Patients With Severe Emphysema N/A
Completed NCT02232841 - Electrical Impedance Imaging of Patients on Mechanical Ventilation N/A
Completed NCT02619591 - Comparison Of Chest Ultrasound Techniques To Identify Clinically Significant Pneumothorax N/A
Recruiting NCT05342675 - Effect of Rapid Rollover on Pneumothorax After CT-Guided Lung Biopsy N/A
Recruiting NCT05910112 - Prospective Data Collection on Clinical, Radiological and Patient Reported Outcomes After Pleural Intervention
Completed NCT03656406 - Effect of Lateral Positioning on Bronchial Cuff Pressure of Left-sided Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube During Thoracic Surgery
Active, not recruiting NCT06075836 - AI Assisted Detection of Chest X-Rays
Recruiting NCT03728491 - Education and Training Competences in Thoracic Ultrasound N/A
Recruiting NCT05407974 - Pleurectomy Versus Pleural Abrasion in Patients With Spontaneous Pneumothorax N/A
Completed NCT01670942 - Hypobaria and Traumatic Pneumothorax N/A
Terminated NCT00969423 - Chronic Pain After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Surgery for Pneumothorax N/A
Completed NCT05904574 - Effectiveness of the Autologous Blood Patch Method in Lung Biopsies
Completed NCT03327688 - Point-of-care Ultrasound in Finland N/A
Completed NCT05963945 - Multi-Reader Retrospective Study Examining Carebot AI CXR 2.0.21-v2.01 Implementation in Everyday Radiology Clinical Practice
Completed NCT05222568 - Effect of the Minimum Bronchial Cuff Volume of Left-sided Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube for One-lung Ventilation on the Change of the Bronchial Cuff Pressure During Lateral Positioning in Thoracic Surgery
Not yet recruiting NCT05121233 - Local Anesthesia Versus Combined Local Anesthesia With Single Dose Analgesia on Pain Control During Thoracic Ultrasound Guided Procedures Phase 4
Completed NCT03064659 - Driving Pressure And EFL in Adult Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT02090205 - Mechanical Ventilation During Cardiac Surgery N/A