View clinical trials related to Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.
Filter by:HyPerMICROBE is a single-centre, controlled, randomised, prospective, superiority clinical trial to compare the efficacy of daily oral care with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Oroxid®) versus standard of care (0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate) on the cumulative incidence of lower respiratory tract microbial colonisation in mechanically ventilated adult critically ill patients.
A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) at Services Hospital, Lahore, aims to reduce Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) incidence and mortality rates while shortening ICU stays in mechanically ventilated patients by adding adjuvant oral care to traditional practices. Study Objectives: Focus: ICU patients on mechanical ventilation. Question: Does adjuvant oral care reduce VAP rates and ICU stays? Methodology: Sample: Minimum 100 eligible subjects via convenient sampling. Randomization: Computer software for unbiased group allocation. Interventions: Intervention group gets Chlorhexidine mouthwash, toothbrushing, and oral gel; control group gets 0.2% Chlorhexidine mouthwash. Measures: Evaluate VAP using Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS) and compare demographic data. Statistical Analysis: SPSS v22 to analyze data. Expected Impact: Potential to reduce VAP and improve ICU patient outcomes. Cost-effective treatment with adjuvant oral care. Shorter ICU stays, relieving VAP burden. Enhanced patient care, reduced mortality, and resource strain. Aligns with reducing VAP incidence and improving ICU patient care.
Main purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of tNGS for pathogen detection and drug resistance analysis in VAP patients. Research site and research population: This study is planned to be conducted in hospitals, targeting VAP patients. Perform clinical routine testing and tNGS testing on lower respiratory tract samples (BALF) from VAP patients, and collect patient clinical information. Clinical routine testing includes culture (necessary), microscopy, serology, PCR, etc., and drug sensitivity tests are conducted on positive culture samples as needed. Finally, compare the consistency of tNGS detection results with clinical culture, comprehensive diagnosis, and drug sensitivity results. Further validation was conducted on consistent negative or inconsistent samples through PCR and mNGS.
Premature infants are susceptible to complications related to infrequent and non-standardized oral care. Although the benefits of frequent standardized oral care are known to reduce oral dysbiosis (increased level of potentially pathogenic bacteria) and its associated complications in critically ill adults leading to established evidence-based guidelines, no such information exists for VLBW infants. The proposed study will prospectively follow 168 VLBW infants for 4 weeks following birth.
The goal of this pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial is to test if less unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed when the lab reports respiratory culture test results in a specific way for patients who have respiratory cultures obtained, but do not meet clinical criteria for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). The main question it aims to answer is: Does a modified culture reporting intervention reduce unnecessary antibiotics for ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)? Researchers will compare antibiotic use outcomes between eligible patients whose test results are communicated using the modified reporting and those with standard reporting of results.
The goal of this clinical trial is to propose a seamless intervention linking rapid bacterial isolate identification and antibiotic resistance gene detection and targeted antibiotic prescription to minimise time between infection onset and appropriate treatment in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales infections. This is an investigator initiated trial. The primary hypothesis is that these interventions will lead to improved clinical outcomes amongst patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterobacterales, compared to standard antibiotic susceptibility testing. Patients will be randomised to either a control or intervention arm. Patients randomised to the intervention arm will have relevant specimens analysed by rapid microbiological diagnostics and will have early availability of ceftazidime-avibactam if appropriate. Patients randomised to the control arm, will have samples analysed by clinical microbiology laboratories using standard of care diagnostics. Antibiotics will be available to these patients as per usual institutional practice.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among critically ill patients. However, in a context of high prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) there is a lack of direct comparison between the incidence of VAP in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts. The investigators conducted a prospective, single-center cohort study comparing COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital in Turin, Italy, between March 2020 and December 2021 (COVID-19 group), with a historical cohort of ICU-mixed patients admitted between June 2016 and March 2018 (NON-COVID-19 group).
Multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial to assess if semiquantitative multiplex PCR assay, as compared to conventional microbiology, can reduce the percentage of patients without microbiological diagnosis in the first 24 hours from HAP/VAP suspicion, thus allowing early de-escalation.
Based on the hypothesis that keeping the endotracheal cuff pressure in the optimum range will reduce the incidence of vip, we aimed to compare the Manual (intermittent) measurement method with the Automatic (continuous) measurement method in reducing the incidence of vap.
In intensive care, many gastric tubes are inserted on a regular basis. There are different practices in terms of the location of the gastric tube. In some cases, the tube is inserted through the nose and in others, it is inserted through the mouth. In the literature and in practice, these gastric tubes create discomfort and complications that have an impact not only on the patient, but also on the treatments and the length of the patient's stay in hospital. Nosocomial Ventilator Associated Pneumonia is the most serious common complication for patients intubated with a gastric tube. It is possible that placement site may have an impact on the risk of developing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, particularly by increasing the risk of bacterial pululation opposite the sinuses when the tube is placed via the nasal route. Investigator hypothesises that placing the gastric tube orally will reduce the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia compared with the nasal route in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients.