Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units: Comparison of Seldinger &

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This prospective randomized multicenter study is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains, in intensive care units patients.

Clinical Trial Description

Drainage of pleural effusion and pneumothorax is a common feature in Resuscitation, Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Continuing Care Units (CCU). Although they are associated with a low incidence of complications (ranging from 0 to 8%), some of these can become fatal if they are associated with a visceral puncture (liver, spleen, lung parenchyma or heart by instance). It has been reported in the literature that complications were greater in case of drainage with large diameter drains set up by so-called "surgical-like" technique. The choice of the type of chest tube is usually guided by the indication of drainage or the habits and / or experience of the practitioner. In the case of liquid pleural effusions, it may be preferable to use small diameter drains, whereas in the case of suspicious thick effusions such as empyema or blood, it may be preferable to use drainage drains of a larger diameter. However, results of retrospective analyzes seem to suggest the versatile and effective use of small-bore chest tubes in any of these indications without increasing complications' rates such as clogging. However, no prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) has studied this issue to date. Therefore, the investigators propose to perform a multicenter RCT in ICU and CCU patients requiring pleural drainage for any indication or underlying disease. This prospective RCT is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains. Furthermore, they want to estimate the respective costs, identify the difficulties related to both strategies, recognize associated practices (ultrasound-guidance, implantation site, operator's competence), and finally point out the secondary determinants of tolerance and effectiveness. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04438317
Study type	Interventional
Source	University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 29, 2020
Completion date	June 28, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04159831` - A Study to Evaluate LTI-01 in Patients With Infected, Non-draining Pleural Effusions	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT02891642` - Liquid Biopsy With Immunomagnetic Beads Capture Technique for Malignant Cell Detection in Body Fluid
Completed	`NCT02232841` - Electrical Impedance Imaging of Patients on Mechanical Ventilation	N/A
Completed	`NCT02045641` - Pleural and Pericardial Effusion Following Open Heart Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT01948076` - Evaluation of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device As an Aid to the Physical Examination	N/A
Completed	`NCT01416519` - Physiotherapy Technique Decreases Respiratory Complications After Cardiac Operation	N/A
Completed	`NCT01560078` - Efficacy Study of Thrice Weekly Directly Observed Treatment Short-Course Regimen in Tubercular Pleural Effusion	N/A
Completed	`NCT04891705` - Point of Care Ultrasound Lung Artificial Intelligence (AI) Validation Data Collection Study
Recruiting	`NCT05759117` - Prospective Evaluation of Patients With Pleural Effusion
Recruiting	`NCT05910112` - Prospective Data Collection on Clinical, Radiological and Patient Reported Outcomes After Pleural Intervention
Completed	`NCT03896672` - Clinical Implementation of the Use of Positive Pressure in Chest Drainage	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06075836` - AI Assisted Detection of Chest X-Rays
Recruiting	`NCT03728491` - Education and Training Competences in Thoracic Ultrasound	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03260088` - Evaluation Of Pleural Effusion At Assiut University Hospital	N/A
Completed	`NCT03535883` - The Safety of Thoracentesis, Tunneled Pleural Catheter, and Chest Tubes in Patients Taking Novel Oral Anti-Coagulants
Completed	`NCT03296280` - Evaluation of Implementation of a National Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training Program
Completed	`NCT03661801` - Novel Pleural Fluid, Biopsy and Serum Biomarkers for the Investigation of Pleural Effusions
Completed	`NCT01778270` - Not Invasive Monitoring of Pleural Drainage	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00402896` - Malignant Pleural Effusion With ZD6474	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT00103766` - Alteplase for Treatment of Empyema and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units: Comparison of Seldinger and Surgical Methods — DrainICU

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms