View clinical trials related to Phobic Disorders.
Filter by:This study investigates whether a one-session exposure treatment for spider-related stimuli can lead to a generalization of extinguished fear to height-related stimuli in individuals with comorbid fear of spiders and fear of heights.
Flying phobia (FP) is one of the most prevalent phobias in our society. However, not all patients benefit from in vivo exposure, given that an important amount of them do not accept the intervention, drop out when they are informed about the intervention procedure, or have problems accessing these therapies. The aim of the present study is to conduct a feasibility pilot with NO-FEAR Airlines ICBT (Campos et al., 2016) using two types of images in the exposure scenarios (still images vs 360º navigable images). A secondary aim is to explore the potential effectiveness of the two active treatment arms compared to a waiting list control group. Finally, we will explore the role of navigable images compared to the still images in the level of anxiety, sense of presence, and reality judgment in the exposure scenarios and whether the aforementioned variables mediate in treatment efficacy. Regarding the main aim of this study, we hypothesize that both treatment conditions will be well accepted by the participants, but participants will prefer 360º images over still images.
Topical steroids are an important component of treatment for many dermatological conditions, however 'Corticosteroid phobia' is a significant factor contributing to non adherence to prescribed therapy. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of targeted education, and involvement in a moderated social forum in reducing steroid phobia as assessed by the TOPICOP© score. Secondary objectives include determining if a decrease in TOPICOP© score correlates to an increase in compliance, or an improvement in quality of life.
Specific phobias and other anxiety disorders represent a major mental health problem, and present a significant challenge to researchers because effective treatment usually involves repeated exposure to feared stimuli, and the high levels of associated distress can lead to termination of treatment. Recent advances in computational functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide a method by which individuals may be unconsciously exposed to fearful stimuli, leading to effective fear reduction while eliminating a primary cause of attrition. The objective of the current study is to use the novel approach of neuro-reinforcement based on decoded fMRI information to reduce fear responses to fearful stimuli (e.g., spiders, heights) in individuals with phobias, directly and unconsciously in the brain, without repeatedly exposing participants to their feared stimuli. Participants will be randomized into one of three groups of varying neuro-reinforcement sessions (1, 3, or 5). They will complete tests of subjective fear and directed attention while being scanned by fMRI to measure engagement of amygdala activity to fearful stimuli as well as measured through other indicators of fear such as skin conductance response.
Whether used alone or in combination with other approaches, strategies such as cognitive restructuring (CR) and exposure are well-established treatments for anxiety. CR involves identifying and challenging thoughts, beliefs, or assumptions that maintain anxiety, and exposure involves confronting feared situations, typically in a gradual manner. Many theories have been proposed to explain why exposure is effective. One theory posits that corrective learning occurs only when expectations about the outcome of a situation are violated. Therefore, exposure is thought to be effective when the discrepancy between the expected and actual outcome is maximized. One group of researches has suggested that engaging in CR prior to exposure will prematurely reduce the discrepancy between expectancy and outcome, resulting in less inhibitory learning. As such, they recommend that CR only be conducted after exposure in order to consolidate learning about expectancy violation. This recommendation has not been experimentally studied and is in contrast to what is typically practiced clinically. CR is often introduced in therapy prior to exposure. The present study will determine whether conducting CR before exposure results in (1) greater initial reductions in expectation following CR before exposure, (2) less expectancy violation, and (3) poorer treatment gains at posttreatment and 1-month followup. Eighty-two participants with claustrophobia will be randomly assigned to receive either CR before exposure or CR after exposure. The intervention will be conducted in a single session.
This study investigates whether stress can augment exposure therapy outcome in patients with specific phobia (spider phobia).
Exposure therapy, including its self-directed forms, is effective for treatment of specific phobias. Nevertheless, there are issues with patient adherence in the use of exposure therapy, including its self-directed formats. Technological advancements, as with smartphones, may improve adherence to self-directed exposure therapy, perhaps due to exposure stimuli being more readily accessible. Thus, there is a need to examine how presenting phobic material on a smartphone might promote increased adherence in conducting self-directed exposure. Additionally, exposure can incorporate phobic material from different perspectives (i.e., first-person or third-person), which is one factor that may impact treatment effectiveness. Participants will be randomly assigned to a treatment or control condition, and complete a pre-assessment and then a post-assessment two weeks later. The assessment consists of a multimodal approach (e.g., self-report, physiological response, and overt behavior). Participants in the treatment condition will be instructed to watch a standard exposure video of a dental examination and prophylaxis three times daily for two weeks. One week of videos was shown in a first-person perspective and the same video will be shown in a third-person perspective for one week. The study can demonstrate the potential utility of smartphone-based self-directed exposure therapy for specific phobia.
Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (i.e., "exposure therapy"), which entails repeated and prolonged confrontation with feared situations/stimuli, is the most effective treatment for anxiety disorders (e.g., arachnophobia). Safety behaviors are actions performed to prevent, minimize, or escape a feared catastrophe and/or associated distress (e.g., wearing thick shoes or gloves when around areas where there might be spiders). It is understood that safety behaviors contribute to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders; accordingly, patients' safety behaviors are traditionally eliminated as soon as possible during exposure therapy (i.e., "response prevention"). Unfortunately, not everyone who receives exposure therapy benefits from this approach. To address the limitations of exposure's effectiveness, some experts have questioned the clinical convention of response prevention during exposure therapy. Specifically, they propose the "judicious use of safety behaviors": the careful and strategic incorporation of safety behaviors during exposure therapy. The controversial role of permitting safety behaviors during exposure has garnered substantial research attention, yet study findings are mixed. The current study, therefore, was designed to improve upon the methodological limitations of previous related research and examine the relative efficacy of traditional exposure with response prevention (E/RP) and the experimental exposure with the judicious use of safety behaviors (E/JU) in a sample of adults with arachnophobia. In light of previous related research, several hypotheses were made regarding the short- (posttreatment) and long-term (1-month follow-up) treatment effects: 1. Primary outcomes: E/RP participants will demonstrate greater improvement in spider phobia than the E/JU participants along behavioral and self-report symptom measures at follow-up. 2. Secondary outcomes: Treatment acceptability and tolerability will be higher for E/JU participants, relative to E/RP participants, before beginning exposures and at posttreatment, but not at follow-up. In addition, hypothesize that E/RP participants will report greater reductions in peak distress and greater improvements in distress tolerance relative to E/JU participants at follow-up. 3. Additional outcome: Exploratory analyses will be conducted to compare the relative rate of behavioral approach and exposure goal completion between treatment conditions.
While knowledge on the neurobiological signatures of fear and anxiety disorders and, in particular, their association with treatment outcome is accumulating, clinical translation still awaits empirical proof of evidence. Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment, but clinically significant change is only seen in approx. 50-65% of patients. Patient stratification is a powerful option to increase treatment response; however, developing prognostic markers suitable for single-patient predictions still is in its infancy and crucially requires external cross-validation embedded within an a priori prediction approach - a procedure yet largely missing in the field of biomarker research. Employing a bicentric strategy the aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that a priori prediction of treatment outcome based on neurobiological measures is possible in a second, independent sample. Building upon findings from previous mechanistic studies, These will be incorporated into the development of a predictive pattern comprising fear-relevant genotypes and molecules targeting neuropeptides, related epigenetic signatures as well as neurofunctional activation patterns associated with fear circuitry functions, and clinical data. Pre-treatment neurobiological signatures will be tested for their potential as a predictive response marker towards behavioral exposure (virtual reality exposure treatment (VRET) and an in vivo behavioral avoidance test) in a model disorder of fear circuitry dysfunctions (spider phobia). Multivariate pattern analyses employing a machine learning framework will be used to generate predictions on the individual patient level and to cross-validate markers in a second, independent sample. While at site A predictions will be generated following completion of the treatment, response will be predicted at site B a priori, but in a double-blind manner. Comparison of observed vs. predicted response rates will serve as a test of hypothesis. In addition, neuroplastic (on a subsample) and epigenetic changes induced by VRET treatment will be assessed following treatment and, in case of epigenetics, also after 6-months follow-up.
Patients with anxiety disorders oftentimes express fear responses to more than only one fear-inducing object. The principal aim of this study is to examine whether the beneficial effects of exposure on fear reduction in spider phobia can extend to stimuli which are conceptually similar to spiders (i.e. cockroaches), but have never been presented during the respective treatment.