Phantom Limb Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Natural Sensory Feedback for Phantom Limb Modulation and Therapy
Background:
Phantom limb pain (PLP) develops in 50-80% of subjects who have a limb amputated. It is not
well known what causes PLP to develop and the current treatments have been shown to be
largely ineffective. Resent research, however, have indicated that cortical reorganizing
occurring after amputation of the cortex areas related to the missing limb may be related to
the development of PLP. Furthermore, the research indicated that by providing meaningful
sensory input coming from the phantom limb the PLP may be alleviated and the cortical
organization normalized.
Aim:
The CIP described in the current application, is part of a the EU-project "EPIONE", which
aims to investigate if and how cortical normalization and PLP alleviation can be induced by
providing phantom limb sensations (sensations which seems to originate from the missing
limb) in hand amputated subjects.
Method:
In the current study, which will take place at Aalborg University Hospital (AUH), 2-4 hand
amputated subjects experiencing severe PLP will implanted with interneural nerve electrodes
in the arm stump for up to one year.
Therapy will be evaluated in two stages, first during a standardized four week phase where
the subject receives daily therapy. If the therapy is shown to be effective, therapy may be
reinitiated during a second longer therapy phase.
During the therapy sessions, selective nerve stimulation will be performed. The amputee will
experience this as sensations (movement, touch, temperature, vibration etc.) originating
from the phantom limb. While implanted, we will investigate how well we can induce these
sensations and we will provide a stimulation therapy, which consist of stimulation
activities which requires the subject to focus on the evoked sensations. Prior to, during a
and following therapy a series of assessments (standardized across all EPIONE partners to
enable comparison) will be conducted to relate therapy with PLP, cortical organization, the
mental state etc. of the subject.
Expected outcome:
The stimulation therapy is expected to alleviate PLP and induce cortical normalization. The
experience we gain might be used for deriving clinical guidelines on how to treat PLP.
The study will be carried out in two parts. The first part will function as a pilot part
where the investigators will seek to get experience with, e.g., stimulation procedures:
Which therapies activities and stimulation parameters do the participants feel are the most
intuitive (i.e., most effective reintroducing the phantom hand into the body image of the
amputee) and thus might be expected to be most effective in normalizing the cortical
organization and alleviating PLP.
After part 1 the data will be analyzed together with the international partners (no
participants identifiable data will be shared) and the shared experiences will be used to
adjust the activities of part two.
The experiment is conducted in the following phases:
1. Startup
2. Pre-screening
3. Baseline and entry
4. Implantation (defined as week 0)
5. Therapy
6. Outcome
7. Follow-up
8. Repetition. Redo phase 3 to 7 with longer therapy phase durations only
Procedures during phases 1 to 7 (weeks -5 to 12) are standardized across international
EPIONE partners (which carry out different interventions, but similar assessments), to
enable comparison between treatment modalities. At AUH, if therapy is shown to be effective
during phase 1-7, the investigators will repeat the initial phases 3 to 7, but with a longer
therapy phase, to investigate the effect of long term stimulation therapy. TIME-4H
electrodes will not be left implanted for a longer duration than one year.
During the different phases of the study a collection of assessment methods is conducted to
monitor the effect of stimulation therapy on the amputee's level of perceived PLP and
cortical organization. In addition, the psychological state of the subject, the strength and
type of the non-painful phantom limb sensations are also assessed to provide a more detailed
view on the possible effects of the stimulation therapy.
The experiment will be conducted as a series of case studies where the effect of the
stimulation therapy in a participant is compared with the PLP sensations the same subjects
perceived before initiating the therapy. Therefore, only amputees who are in a stable state
(e.g., not newly amputated subjects) are included in the study.
No placebo or blinding is performed as the participant can feel the stimulation and also has
to be mentally active involved in performing "phantom limb movements" when receiving
stimulation therapy.
Phases 1-7 for each subject (week -3 to week 12, week = 0 is implantation) are performed
according to the experiment protocol defined in collaboration with international partners.
Phase 8, has been defined by AUH, and is constituted by a repetition of the phases 3-7,
where the treatment phase has been prolonged.
Phase 1: Startup The participant is invited to a meeting with the principal investigator and
one of the senior researchers involved in the study to be informed about the experiment.
Only the PI, who is a medical doctor, will be allowed to answer health and medical related
questions.
Phase 2: Pre-screening This phase is conducted before the start of the experiment but after
the subject has signed the informed consent form and the authority form, the latter granting
representatives from Danish Health and Medicines Agency access to the study data and patient
record for control purposes. Via questionnaires, tests and interviews it is evaluated if the
participant fulfills the inclusion criteria in relation to physical health (able to undergo
surgery), depression, normal range of IQ and PLP. The principal investigator will evaluate
the results and decide whether the participant should be included or excluded.
Phase: Baseline and entry The baseline and entry phase aims to determine the stability and
intra-subject variability of the pain sensations without treatment. The measure control for
the daily variability in pain, assessment scoring variability, site-to-site variability and
inter subject variability in the "before intervention" state. These variances will be used
in the analysis to estimate baseline noise in the measure.
A second rationale for the repetition of these measures in this phase is to trap any effect
that might come out of running the assessment, e.g., due to the increased attention on PLP.
If the participants live close to AUH, these assessments will be conducted at AUH under
supervision of experimenters. If it is unpractical for the participants to attend the daily
sessions at AUH, the subject may conduct them at home after receiving adequate training and
while being in regular contact with an experimenter. If performed at home, assessments
(questionnaire) may be filled out by the subjects on printed-out versions or using a laptop
with the Psychophysical Testing Platform installed using a participants specific login with
accompanying functional restrictions.
In addition to the questionnaire used for quantifying the perceived phantom limb pain and
sensation, the last week before implantation includes the application of cortical mapping
methods (EEG, SEP and fMRI).
During all phases of the study the subject is required to fill out a diary before going to
bed about the development of PLP during the day.
Phase 3: Implantation Surgical implantation of the TIME-4H electrodes is conducted under
full anesthesia. During the operation, the median and the ulnar nerves are freed through an
incision of 20 cm on the medial aspect of the upper-arm. The fascicles of both nerves are
dissected free for a couple of centimeters at the level where the TIME-4H electrodes are to
be implanted. Four TIME-4H electrodes are pulled in to the fascicles of the nerves using the
attached needle and thread, two TIME-4H in each nerve. The electrode are anchored to the
nerve using the dedicated anchoring points of the TIME-4H (seen on figure 4 (B)). After
placing the electrodes the electrical integrity of each TIME-4H electrode is tested, before
closing the wound. Lead out wires are lead out through the skin and the wound is closed.
During surgery the participant is treated with prophylactic antibiotics. Prophylactic
antibiotics are not administered later in the study due to the risk of the development of
resistance.
After the implantation the subject is offered to stay at Patienthotellet to enable routine
assessment of the surgical outcome as long as the PI judges it necessary.
Wound treatment While the electrodes are implanted, the subject will routinely have the
wound where the wires exit the arm cleaned and treated to reduce the risk of infection. This
will be conducted by a nurse who is member of the project group.
The participant will receive training in treating/cleaning the wound and also in what
symptoms to be aware of. During phases of the study where the subject does not attend daily
therapy sessions and thus is not in daily face-to-face contact with the project team, the
participant may for shorter periods perform the wound treatment him/herself.
Phase 5: Therapy Phantom limb pain and sensations are assessed via questionnaire prior to
and following the stimulation therapy. Several assessments are conducted during this phase
with the purpose of characterizing the sensations which can be evoked and to provide sensory
stimulation therapy with the aim of alleviating the phantom limb pain.
- PsyP-Map (B): Stimulation is conducted using each of the individual contact sites and
different combinations of the implanted TIME-4H with the purpose (1) of determining
suitable (above sensation threshold and below pain threshold) stimulation parameters
(intensity, pulse width etc.) and (2) of mapping the perceived location and type of the
sensations evoked.
o Will be conducted once every week; each session will last approx. 2 hours.
- Stimulation therapy: Stimulation is performed with the aim of inducing meaningful
sensory input to the subject and thereby inducing a normalization of the cortical
organization and alleviation of PLP. This is sought accomplished by performing
activities which reintroduce the missing limb into the subject's body image:
- The subject is instructed to imagine performing a movement or sensation indicated
on the subject computer screen with the phantom hand. During this "movement" the
experimenter will seek to evoke relevant sensations via electrical stimulation.
- The therapy session will be conducted once every weekday; each session will last
approx. 2 hours.
If the results indicate that the therapy was effective and the subject is interested in
continuing the therapy, the TIME-4H electrodes are left implanted during the outcome and
follow-up phase. However, no stimulation therapy is performed during these phases.
An fMRI examination is scheduled to be carried out at the end of the therapy phase. The
TIME-4H is currently being tested for MR compatibility, and the result is expected in March
2015. If the TIME-4H is compatible, the fMRI examination will be conducted as planned. If it
is not compatible, the fMRI examination will be conducted when the TIME-4H has been
explanted.
Phase 6: Outcome After four weeks of therapy a series of assessments are performed to assess
the effect of therapy.
No stimulation therapy is conducted during the outcome and the following follow-up phase.
Phase 7: Follow-up During the follow-up phase it is assessed how long time it takes for any
effects pain alleviating effect of the therapy to wear off.
The frequency of the follow-up assessment will be dependent on whether the therapy is
effective in the individual subjects (entry assessments compared with outcome assessments).
If effective, follow-up assessments are conducted one time each week, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after
ended therapy. If deemed ineffective, follow-up assessments are only conducted 4 weeks after
ended therapy (week 8).
At the end of the follow-up phase the procedures standardized between the EPIONE
international partners end, and partners decide individually how to proceed.
Phase 8: Repetition of therapy At AUH, in the case that the applied stimulation therapy
reduces the PLP of the subject and the subject is interested in continuing the therapy, the
therapy may be reinitiated by repeating the procedures of phase 3 to7, however, with a
longer therapy period.
The study duration for a subject will be limited by the maximum TIME-4H implantation
duration, which has been set to one year maximum, and later in the study the overall
termination of experimental activities in the EPIONE study.
Recognizing the potential long duration of the study and the large effect daily therapy
sessions will have on the subject's everyday life, especially for subjects living far from
AUH, the therapy will be adjusted in terms of frequency (e.g., one time weekly) and duration
(hours per session) to suit the subject, while aiming at the administration of enough
therapy to induce a sufficient PLP alleviating effect.
Explantation In the event of infection, blushing, swelling, pain or other complications
which render continuous implantation impossible, the electrodes will be explanted and the
subject treated with antibiotics.
Explantation of the TIME-4H electrodes may be conducted at the end of the therapy phase if
the therapy is unsuccessful or if the subject does not wish to continue.
If the subject wishes to continue the therapy, the maximal allowed implantation time will be
1 year.
Explantation will be carried out under full anesthesia. Access is obtained via an insertion
made through the skin on the medial side of the upper arm. The TIME-4H electrodes are
dissected free, thread cut and the implant pulled out of the nerve and removed. Following
the explantation normal wound treatment will be conducted and the stitches removed according
to standard procedures.
;
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04060875 -
Research Protocol for Karuna Labs Inc.: Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Reality Graded Motor Imagery for Chronic Pain
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02519907 -
Surface Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02281539 -
Myoelectrically Controlled Augmented Reality and Gaming for the Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01608035 -
Sciatic Perineural Versus Stump Catheter for Below Knee Amputation
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT03111277 -
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05188183 -
Pragmatic Trial of Remote tDCS and Somatosensory Training for Phantom Limb Pain With Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02221934 -
Electrical Nerve Block for Amputation Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03029884 -
Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Refractory Neuropathic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04538417 -
C-RFA of Residual Limb Neuroma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03317600 -
Postamputation Pain: Peripheral Mechanisms
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01996254 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-Amputation Pain Using the SPRINT System
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00771862 -
Prevention of Phantom Limb and Stump Pain Using Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Pilot Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00462566 -
The Efficacy of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Pain Control
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05684445 -
The Effect of Distant Reiki on Pain and Holistic Well-being
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02784548 -
Virtual Reality for Phantom Limb Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05915065 -
VR to Evaluate Phantom Limb Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00797849 -
Controlled Study of Farabloc for Chronic Phantom Limb Pain Among Veteran Amputees
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05807607 -
Study of Lower-limb Phantom Pain Syndrome Using Peripheral Nerve and Spinal Cord Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03350061 -
Prosthesis With Sensations
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06428123 -
Comparison of Efficacy of Mirror Therapy vs Mental Imagery in Reduction of Phantom Limb Pain in AKAP
|
N/A |