Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03105193 |
Other study ID # |
IPL/IVL |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 17, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
December 30, 2019 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2020 |
Source |
University of Auckland, New Zealand |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effects of intraperitoneal lignocaine
(IPL) compared with intravenous lignocaine (IVL) after laparoscopic colon resections. We plan
to run a 2 group randomized, double blind, clinical trial which will look into morphine
consumption as the primary outcome.
Group 1 (IV lignocaine)- IV bolus of lignocaine and a 3 day post operative IV lignocaine
infusion. Intra peritoneal (IP) bolus of normal saline + 3 day post operative IP normal
saline infusion
Group 2 (IP lignocaine)- IV bolus of normal saline and a 3 day post operative IV normal
saline infusion. IP bolus of lignocaine + 3 day post operative IP lignocaine infusion
Description:
Over the last 20 years, laparoscopic colonic surgery has become an accepted first-line
treatment for colon cancer. A population-based study showed that laparoscopic colonic
resections can be performed with lower hospital costs up to 90 days after discharge when
compared to open surgery. Laparoscopic colonic resections have also been associated with
fewer postoperative complications and lower mortality.
New Zealand has one of the highest rates of bowel cancer in the world, and it is the second
highest cause of cancer deaths in New Zealand. With the implementation of a bowel screening
programme in New Zealand, the projected numbers of stage 1 bowel cancers are expected to
increase. More avenues to improve perioperative care need to be explored to improve patient
outcomes.
Controlling postoperative pain effectively has been shown to reduce the length of hospital
stay and improve patient/clinical outcomes. Opioids work as μ-receptor agonists in the spinal
cord and brain, and although opioids are excellent at reducing pain, they are associated with
nausea, vomiting, dizziness, decreased blood pressure, and urinary retention. Epidurals have
been incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for controlling
post-operative pain. However, epidurals are an invasive procedure with significant side
effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, respiratory depression, motor blockade and
rarely epidural abscess and meningitis. It has also been shown that up to 30 percent of
epidural catheters dislodge, block or leak. These complications have led to a movement
towards other regional analgesia techniques which allow local anaesthetic (LA) to target the
abdominal wound specifically.
Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic (IPLA) has shown promise in reducing pain after colonic
surgery with a meta-analysis9, and a recent IPLA colorectal study conducted at Counties
Manukau health showing that it reduces pain and opioid use over and above the effect of an
epidural10, which is primarily aimed at the abdominal wound. After an IPLA bolus serum local
anaesthetic levels are detectable within 2 minutes. Some studies show reduced early
postoperative pain and opioid consumption with intravenous lignocaine infusion alone. The
question remains however if there is a benefit from using intraperitoneal local anaesthetic
compared to administering it intravenously as the IPLA should block both the intraabdominal
wound, via a local action, and the skin wound via a systemic action.. This has been
investigated in four studies, however none of these studies compared intravenous local
anaesthetic (IVLA) and IPLA for colon resection.
The aim is that, by optimising analgesia regimes using local anaesthetic, we can improve
patient experience of pain and recovery thereby achieving an earlier discharge and early
recovery from surgery. This has significant economic benefits for all involved.