Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04616170
Other study ID # 2020P003603
Secondary ID
Status Enrolling by invitation
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 5, 2021
Est. completion date April 2024

Study information

Verified date March 2022
Source Massachusetts General Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to forcibly flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this forced stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. This study will examine whether extending the hips, as compared to usual care, at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery decreases maternal perineal trauma among nulliparous women.


Description:

Perineal trauma at the time of vaginal delivery is a significant cause of maternal morbidity including vaginal pain, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, infection, and social isolation in severe cases. There are well known risk factors in the literature for OASIS (obstetric anal sphincter injuries), however, this literature is by no means comprehensive. A prior RCT in 2012 looked at the role of patient positioning at the time of pushing and delivery to determine whether stirrup positioning and forced hip flexion leads to higher rates of any perineal tears. The study concluded that stirrup positioning did not lead to higher rates of perineal tearing but was not powered to evaluate the role of positioning on OASIS tears or on postpartum perineal morbidity. In addition to lacking data with respect to patient positioning, data is limited regarding perineal morbidity beyond the traditional grading system of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree tears. 3rd and 4th degree lacerations are labeled as OASIS, however, perineal morbidity can result from "lower" orders of perineal tearing at the time of delivery. Prior studies have tried to illustrate various subsets of second degree lacerations in an attempt to subdivide 2nd degree lacerations into categories of severity, however, little has been done in practice with this form of division and little is written on the topic of perineal morbidity beyond OASIS tears. It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. The closest studies to examine this have been in comparing women who deliver in the squatting position compared to in lithotomy. Those who deliver in squatting positions have been found to have deeper perineal lacerations, which demonstrate the possibility that forced flexion at the hips could lead to the same outcome in the lithotomy position. Should research show an increased risk of morbidity with this near universal positioning practice as compared to hip extension, this study could change practice patterns for the betterment of patients worldwide.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Enrolling by invitation
Enrollment 1206
Est. completion date April 2024
Est. primary completion date April 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Nulliparous women - Non-anomalous fetuses - Term gestation - Vertex presentation - Eligible for trial of labor Exclusion Criteria: - Multiparous women - Prior perineal malformations - History female genital mutilation - Prior perineal surgery - Anomalous fetuses - Multiple gestations - Fetal status incompatible with labor

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Hip extension
Hips extended at the time of vaginal delivery
Usual Care
Hips positioned in the "usual care" position per provider preference at the time of vaginal delivery

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Massachusetts General Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Classification of perineal laceration The degree of perineal laceration as classified by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) classification system At the time of vaginal delivery
Secondary Rate of OASIS laceration Number of obstetric anal sphincter injury lacerations compared to all deliveries At the time of vaginal delivery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05908292 - Optimizing Postpartum Pelvic Health Through Self-Scar Tissue Massage of Episiotomy and Perineal Scar Tissue A Pilot RCT N/A
Completed NCT03184077 - Rapidly Absorbing Polyglactin 910 Versus Poliglecaprone 25 for Laceration Repair N/A
Completed NCT03670420 - The Application of Honey on Perineal Sutures N/A
Completed NCT03039582 - Short Anovaginal Distance is Associated With Obstetric Anal Sphincter Rupture N/A
Recruiting NCT05935371 - Consequences of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries on Maternal Psychology and Relationship Experience
Completed NCT03041779 - Comparison Between Rectal Suppository Acetaminophen and Diclofenac Sodium as Analgesia for Postpartum Perineal Tear Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05556304 - In Vivo Evaluation of Perineal Mechanical Properties During Childbirth N/A
Recruiting NCT03983343 - Skin Glues Compared to Running Sutures for Perineal Skin Repair After Vaginal Delivery. A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT01533467 - A Device Designed to Protect the Perineum During Labor Phase 2
Completed NCT03825211 - Continuous Versus Discontinuous Suture in the Perineals Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04860102 - Hands on vs Hands Off for Perineal Laceration N/A
Suspended NCT04914182 - Low Power Laser for Spontaneous Perineal Laceration N/A
Completed NCT03163160 - Electrolysis Technique vs Manual Therapy in Pelvic Pain N/A
Completed NCT05282160 - The Influence of Prepartum Perineal Training With the Epi-No Device on Pelvic Floor Function. N/A
Completed NCT05955352 - The Effect of Using Perineal Warm Compress Techniques During the Second Stage of Labor on Perineal Outcomes N/A
Completed NCT03559816 - Selective Use of Episiotomy: the Impact on Perineal Trauma.
Recruiting NCT04544488 - Descriptive Evaluation of Expulsive Efforts During Pregnancy in Term Nulliparous Women by Measurement of Intra Bladder Pressure: Pilot Observational Study. N/A
Completed NCT03770962 - One Plus One Equals Two, Will That do? N/A
Completed NCT05946005 - Lidocaine, Povidone Iodine, and Honey Application on Second-degree Perineal Tear Healing Phase 4
Completed NCT05962918 - Perineal Massage Performed During the Labour N/A