Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04996563
Other study ID # 2021H0064
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 2, 2021
Est. completion date December 12, 2022

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source Ohio State University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial investigating if a patient educational video on pelvic organ prolapse improves patient understanding of this pelvic floor disorder and satisfaction in their healthcare decision making for its management.


Description:

This is a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized either to watch a pre-visit educational video on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in addition to routine physician counseling (intervention group) or routine physician counseling alone (control group). The counseling physician will be blinded. All participants will complete a pre-visit survey that includes the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge - POP (PIKQ-POP) and a demographics questionnaire. The PIKQ-POP has been validated to assess for patient knowledge of POP. Those randomized to the intervention group will take a brief survey after watching the video asking if they had any technical issues with the video and confirming they watched the video. At the end of all initial clinic visits, participants will complete a post-visit survey that includes the validated Satisfaction with Decision Scale for Pelvic Floor Disorders (SDS-PFD) to assess the primary outcome of change in patient decision satisfaction. The SDS is designed to assess satisfaction with a treatment decision. The SDS was modified into the SDS-PFD to be specific for women making decisions regarding surgical treatment for pelvic floor disorders. To assess the secondary outcomes of change in decision conflict and POP knowledge, the post-visit survey will also include a validated Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) and the PIKQ-POP. The DCS was developed to evaluate the effect of health care decision aids and decision-supporting interventions on decision uncertainty. The physician will also complete a counseling survey at the end of the visit to assess their perception of patient comprehension and their ease of counseling. After undergoing their chosen management option, participants will also complete a post-management survey in follow up which will include the SDS-PFD and PIKQ-POP.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 37
Est. completion date December 12, 2022
Est. primary completion date May 17, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Initial evaluation for symptomatic POP - Age greater than or equal to 18 years old - Reliable access to text or e-mail Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant women - Presence of cognitive disability - Non-English speaking patient or requiring interpreter assistance - Women with a history of prior pelvic organ prolapse therapy, i.e. pelvic floor physical therapy, pessary, or surgical repair

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Video
A brief educational video, approximately 9 minutes in duration, on pelvic organ prolapse is sent electronically to patients to view prior to their initial visit in order to provide early access to information. The video was created to educate patients on the following key components of prolapse: the clinical condition, associated symptoms, common risk factors, evaluation and diagnosis, non-surgical treatment options, and surgical treatment options. Simple drawings and animations are included as visual aids to enhance the ability to conceptualize prolapse and its management options.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ohio State University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Difference in SDS-PFD score The difference in the score of a validated decision satisfaction questionnaire, the Satisfaction with Decision Scale for Pelvic Floor Disorders (SDS-PFD), will be compared between the two arms. A difference of 0.4 will be considered clinically meaningful. The SDS-PFD was modified from the original SDS to be specific for women making decisions regarding surgical treatment for PFD. It has 6 questions with a 5-point response scale. The score is calculated by taking the mean of the 6 answers (1-5). Higher scores correspond with higher satisfaction. Within 1 day of completion of the initial visit
Secondary Difference in DCS score The difference in the score of the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) will be compared between the two arms. The DCS has been validated to assess decision conflict related to treatment selection. It has 16 questions. Each question is answered on a 5-point Likert scale of 0 to 4. The scores are summed, divided by 16, and multiplied by 25. Final scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher decision conflict. Within 1 day of completion of the initial visit
Secondary Difference in PIKQ-POP score The difference in the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge - POP Questionnaire (PIKQ-POP) will be compared between the two arms. The PIKQ-POP has been validated to assess for patient knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse. It has 12 questions. Each correct question receives a score of 1. Each incorrect answer or answer of "I don't' know" receives a score of 0. The total score is the number of correct answers ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher POP knowledge. Within 1 day of completion of the initial visit
Secondary Patient perception of their knowledge The difference in the patient's perception of their knowledge will be compared between the two arms. Patients will be asked their perception of their level of knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse. Within 1 day of completion of the initial visit
Secondary Physician's perception of patient's understanding of prolapse The difference in the physician's perception of the patient's understanding of prolapse will be compared between the two arms. The physician will complete a counseling survey with a set of non-validated questions to assess their perception of if the patient viewed the video, the ease of counseling, and if the patient had a good understanding of their clinical issue. Within 1 day of completion of the initial visit
Secondary Difference in SDS-PFD scores after management of prolapse Patients will complete a final survey, the post-management survey. The difference in the patient's SDS-PFD scores will be compared between the two arms. The post-management survey will be administered in follow up to the patient after undergoing their chosen management option for the treatment of prolapse. Higher SDS-PDF scores correspond with higher satisfaction. Within 2 weeks to 1 year after undergoing the chosen management option
Secondary Difference in PIKQ-POP scores after management of prolapse Patients will complete a final survey, the post-management survey. The difference in the patient's PIKQ-POP scores will be compared between the two arms. The post-management survey will be administered in follow up to the patient after undergoing their chosen management option for the treatment of prolapse. Higher PIKQ-POP scores indicate higher POP knowledge. Within 2 weeks to 1 year after undergoing the chosen management option
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05422209 - The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05420831 - Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment N/A
Completed NCT05493735 - Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction Phase 3
Completed NCT06126328 - Materna Prep Study Phase II Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05542836 - EVeRLAST 2-Year Follow-Up
Recruiting NCT05918367 - Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
Recruiting NCT04172272 - The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT04807920 - BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB Phase 4
Completed NCT06268782 - The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women N/A
Recruiting NCT03146195 - The 3D Reconstruction Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT02919852 - Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia N/A
Completed NCT02925585 - Vaginal Tactile Imaging for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
Not yet recruiting NCT02536001 - Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes N/A
Recruiting NCT02113969 - Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol N/A
Completed NCT02383199 - Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT01673360 - Collection of Long Term Patient Outcomes Data Following Implantation of AMS Surgical Devices N/A
Withdrawn NCT01530191 - Factors Affecting Perioperative Outcomes N/A
Completed NCT01842464 - Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring N/A
Completed NCT01320631 - Male Sexual Experience and Its Impact on Quality of Life Before and After Their Sexual Partners Undergo Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction N/A
Completed NCT00581412 - Composite Graft Use in Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Reduces Erosion Rates N/A