Pelvic Organ Prolapse Clinical Trial
— RoboLapsOfficial title:
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Randomized Trial Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
Verified date | October 2023 |
Source | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of this study is to compare 30-day complication rates associated with promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse performed via a robot-assisted laparoscopic technique versus a non-robot-assisted laparoscopic technique. Secondary objectives include comparing technical data, anatomical correction, prolapse recurrence, incontinence, quality of life and medico-economic data between the two techniques. The patient diary did not allow the collection of sufficiently precise data to meet the secondary medico-economic objective of the study. Access to data from the National Health Data System (SDNS), which was not available at the time of the initial drafting of this protocol, now makes it possible to obtain a complete picture of patients' health care consumption. We propose, therefore, to extract data from the SNIIRAM via the SNDS (matching of patients' NIR to their health care consumption) in order to retrieve and accurately estimate the cost of follow-up.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 365 |
Est. completion date | September 27, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | September 12, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patient has a first,(primo-event), symptomatic, genito-urinary prolapse of at least stage II (POP-Q classification) requiring surgery - The patient must have given her informed and signed consent - The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan - The patient is available for 60 months of follow-up Exclusion Criteria: - The patient is participating in another study - The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship - The patient refuses to sign the consent - It is impossible to correctly inform the patient - The patient is pregnant - Patient has a stage-1 prolapse (POP-Q classification) - Patient has asymptomatic prolapse - The patient has a prolapse recurrence (i.e. this is not the first case of prolapse) - The patient is not available for 60 months of follow-up - Patient has a vaginal or urinary infection - Patient has poorly-adjusted diabetes - Patient on long-term corticotherapy - Patient has previously had pelvic radiotherapy - Patient has contraindication for anesthesia - Patient has an intestinal inflammatory disease |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Groupe Urologie Saint Augustin | Bordeaux | |
France | APHP - Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor | Créteil | |
France | CHU de Dijon | Dijon | |
France | CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie | Montpellier | |
France | CHU de Nancy - Hôpitaux de Brabois | Nancy | |
France | CHU de Nantes | Nantes | |
France | CHU de Nice - Hôpitaux L'Archet 1 et 2 | Nice | |
France | CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau | Nîmes | Gard |
France | Clinique Kennedy | Nîmes | |
France | APHP - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpetrière | Paris | |
France | Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon - Site Reuilly | Paris | |
France | CHU de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Pierre Benite | |
France | CHU de Rennes - Hôpital PontChaillou | Rennes | |
France | Clinique Belledonne | St Martin d'Héres | |
France | CHRU de Strasbourg - Hôpital Civil | Strasbourg Cedex | |
France | Hôpital Foch | Suresnes | |
France | CHRU de Toulouse - Hôpital de Rangueil | Toulouse | |
France | CHRU de Tours - Hôpital Bretonneau | Tours |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | presence/absence of complications (composite score) | The occurrence (in the per-operative phase or within 30 days post-op) of at least one of the following: 1) bleeding complications: hemoperitoneum, blood loss> = 500 ml, transfusion; 2) infectious complications: wound infection, abscess, discitis, mesh infection; 3) any wound caused by a surgeon movement: bladder, digestive, ureteral, or vascular injuries; (4) medical complications: deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumopathy; 5) trocart sites: infection, hernia; 6) conversion to a laparoscopic or open surgical technique not related to pre-existing adhesions; 7) reintervention; 8) neurological complications: neurological disorders, complications of the central neurological system, sciatica; 9) others: complete urinary retention, lower urinary tract infection, extrusion, erosion of the mesh, hospitalization in intensive care; 10) death. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Time needed to prep the operation room (min) | 1 day | ||
Secondary | length of hospital stay (days) | The number of days the patient stays in the hospital following promontofixation | 1 month | |
Secondary | Operative time (min) | The time elapsed between incision and closure of the patient | 1 day | |
Secondary | Anesthesia time (min) | The time elapsed between anethesia induction and awakening | 1 day | |
Secondary | Equipment installation time (min) | Time elapsed between installation of trocarts and insertion of endoscopic instruments (robot arms or coelioscopic tools) | 1 day | |
Secondary | Surgical time (min) | The time spent manipulating endoscopic intruments or console time for robotic techniques. | 1 day | |
Secondary | Presence/absence of conversion | In the robot arm: the need to convert to laparoscopic procedure or open procedure; in the non-robot arm: the need to convert to an open procedure | Day 1 | |
Secondary | presence/absence of a re-intervention | 30 days | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of urinary incontinence | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of urinary incontinence | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of urinary incontinence | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of urinary incontinence | 60 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of constipation | 3 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of constipation | 12 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of constipation | 36 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of constipation | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of fecal incontinence | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of fecal incontinence | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of fecal incontinence | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Presence/absence of fecal incontinence | 60 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of dysparunia | 3 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of dysparunia | 12 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of dysparunia | 36 months | ||
Secondary | presence/absence of dysparunia | 60 months | ||
Secondary | POP-Q score | 3 months | ||
Secondary | POP-Q score | 12 months | ||
Secondary | POP-Q score | 36 months | ||
Secondary | POP-Q score | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Urodynamic exam Q max (ml/s) | Urination rate il ml/s | 3 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam Q max (ml/s) | Urination rate il ml/s | 12 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam Q max (ml/s) | Urination rate il ml/s | 36 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam Q max (ml/s) | Urination rate il ml/s | 60 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam, volume urinated (ml) | the volume urinated in ml | 3 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam, volume urinated (ml) | the volume urinated in ml | 12 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam, volume urinated (ml) | the volume urinated in ml | 36 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam, volume urinated (ml) | the volume urinated in ml | 60 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: post-mictionnel residu (ml) | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: post-mictionnel residu (ml) | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: post-mictionnel residu (ml) | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: post-mictionnel residu (ml) | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: fonctional bladder capacity (ml) | bladder capacity in ml | 3 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: fonctional bladder capacity (ml) | bladder capacity in ml | 12 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: fonctional bladder capacity (ml) | bladder capacity in ml | 36 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: fonctional bladder capacity (ml) | bladder capacity in ml | 60 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: urethral closure pressure (cm water) | urethral closure pressure in cm of water | 3 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: urethral closure pressure (cm water) | urethral closure pressure in cm of water | 12 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: urethral closure pressure (cm water) | urethral closure pressure in cm of water | 36 months | |
Secondary | Urodynamic exam: urethral closure pressure (cm water) | urethral closure pressure in cm of water | 60 months | |
Secondary | Wexner anal incontinence score | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Wexner anal incontinence score | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Wexner anal incontinence score | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Wexner anal incontinence score | 60 months | ||
Secondary | ODS constipation score | 3 months | ||
Secondary | ODS constipation score | 12 months | ||
Secondary | ODS constipation score | 36 months | ||
Secondary | ODS constipation score | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | day 1 | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | day 2 | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | day 3 | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | day 4 | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for pain | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | Is the patient very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, or very unsatisfied in relation to the procedure? | Day 4 | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | Is the patient very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, or very unsatisfied in relation to the procedure? | 3 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | Is the patient very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, or very unsatisfied in relation to the procedure? | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | Is the patient very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, or very unsatisfied in relation to the procedure? | 36 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | Is the patient very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, or very unsatisfied in relation to the procedure? | 60 months | |
Secondary | Questionnaire PFDI-20 | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFDI-20 | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFDI-20 | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFDI-20 | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFIQ-7 | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFIQ-7 | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFIQ-7 | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PFIQ-7 | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PISQ-12 | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PISQ-12 | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PISQ-12 | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire PISQ-12 | 60 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire SF36 | 3 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire SF36 | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire SF36 | 36 months | ||
Secondary | Questionnaire SF36 | 60 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05420831 -
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05422209 -
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05493735 -
Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06126328 -
Materna Prep Study Phase II
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05542836 -
EVeRLAST 2-Year Follow-Up
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05918367 -
Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04172272 -
The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04807920 -
BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06268782 -
The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02919852 -
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03146195 -
The 3D Reconstruction Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02925585 -
Vaginal Tactile Imaging for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02536001 -
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02113969 -
Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02383199 -
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01673360 -
Collection of Long Term Patient Outcomes Data Following Implantation of AMS Surgical Devices
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01530191 -
Factors Affecting Perioperative Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01842464 -
Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01320631 -
Male Sexual Experience and Its Impact on Quality of Life Before and After Their Sexual Partners Undergo Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00581412 -
Composite Graft Use in Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Reduces Erosion Rates
|
N/A |