Pelvic Organ Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Feasibility Study for a Randomised Controlled Trial of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Combined With Vaginal Pessary for Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
1. To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the
effectiveness of a PFMT intervention in conjunction with vaginal pessary management
versus vaginal pessary management alone for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
2. To develop and test the methods for a main trial.
The ultimate aim of a large multi-centre RCT would be to answer the question:
Is conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse with an individualised PFMT intervention
in conjunction with vaginal pessary more effective than vaginal pessary alone in reducing
prolapse-specific symptoms, prolapse severity and the need for further prolapse treatment?
It is hypothesised that undertaking PFMT with a pessary in place may increase the level of
existing muscle support in the pelvic area: by reducing the descent of the pelvic organs and
the consequent stretching of soft tissue the pessary may allow the pelvic floor muscles to
be exercised and strengthened more effectively. Potentially this could lead to additional
improvements in the pessary retention rate and associated prolapse symptoms beyond that
expected from the pessary alone. Urine, bowel and sexual function, which can be affected by
prolapse, may also improve independently in response to a PFMT intervention. If a more
permanent reduction in prolapse symptoms results from concurrent use of PFMT, this may delay
or prevent the need for long term pessary use or surgical intervention. In summary, a PFMT
intervention in combination with pessary management for vaginal prolapse may be more
effective in reducing symptoms and increasing quality of life than management of the
prolapse with a pessary alone. This study will start to provide the evidence to address this
question.
This is a feasibility study to develop the methods for a multi-centre RCT. It will run
alongside The POPPY Trial (a 17 centre trial of PFMT already underway in the UK;
ClinicalTrials Number NCT00476892). Three of The POPPY Trial centres will be involved in
this feasibility study. Over a 12 month period, we plan to enrol 50 women with diagnosed
prolapse of stage I to IV, who are not eligible for The POPPY Trial because they require a
pessary. These women will be randomised into one of two groups: PFMT (delivered by a
physiotherapist at 5 appointments over 16 weeks) in conjunction with pessary management of
their prolapse or pessary management alone. All women will have a nurse appointment six
months after randomisation at which time their pessary will be removed. A replacement
pessary will not be immediately re-fitted. At seven months after randomisation all women
will have a review appointment with their gynaecologist to have their prolapse assessed, the
pessary re-fitted if necessary, and other treatment needs discussed. Women will complete
postal questionnaires, at baseline (prior to randomisation), at six months
post-randomisation (prior to seeing the nurse to have the pessary removed), and seven months
post-randomisation (prior to the 7 month gynaecologist review appointment), and record
symptoms in a diary for one month after removal of the pessary. Key outcomes are: prolapse
symptoms, prolapse-related quality of life, prolapse severity, and additional prolapse
treatment received up to seven months after study entry.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05422209 -
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05420831 -
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05493735 -
Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06126328 -
Materna Prep Study Phase II
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05542836 -
EVeRLAST 2-Year Follow-Up
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05918367 -
Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04172272 -
The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04807920 -
BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06268782 -
The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02919852 -
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03146195 -
The 3D Reconstruction Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02925585 -
Vaginal Tactile Imaging for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02536001 -
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02113969 -
Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02383199 -
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01673360 -
Collection of Long Term Patient Outcomes Data Following Implantation of AMS Surgical Devices
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01842464 -
Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01530191 -
Factors Affecting Perioperative Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01320631 -
Male Sexual Experience and Its Impact on Quality of Life Before and After Their Sexual Partners Undergo Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00581412 -
Composite Graft Use in Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Reduces Erosion Rates
|
N/A |