View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Filter by:The investigators scientific aims are to determine the benefits associated with the use of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy surgery on women with prolapse, to define how the benefits impact the patient, physician and the institution, and to determine the complications associated with the use of the robot. This will be a prospective cohort following 100 patients for a 24 month period.
Does mechanical bowel preparation (complete bowel cleansing)help the Surgeon with visualization of the operative field during laparoscopic pelvic reconstructive surgery?
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common disorder that affects 3-9% of adult women. Treatment of this disorder varies and includes conservative and interventional treatment. Pelvic organs prolapse grading has an important roll in determining the appropriate treatment. Developments in this field has led to the development of an agreed method to rate the degree of pelvic organs prolapse (POPQ). The roll of Urodynamic test is to assess whether there is urinary incontinence and underlying cause. In Richard C. et al publication, that presented the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) method for the first time, there was no reference to the urinary bladder state (full or empty) during the examination, hence the investigators are asking to conduct a prospective study in order to evaluate the degree of pelvic organs prolapse according to POPQ method during urodynamic examination, with a full and empty urinary bladder.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System as a Device in Women with Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
The purpose of this randomized double blind controlled study is to assess the value of robotics for the treatment of complex pelvic floor dysfunction. The main aim is to compare perioperative and functional outcomes to the laparoscopic approach.
The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative complications and outcome two different attachment sites of the dorsal mesh support in laparoscopic sacropexy.
The aim of the study is to evaluate safety and outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacropexy regarding perioperative data, objective anatomical results and postoperative quality of life.
This prospective randomized controlled study will determine the efficacy of continuous local anesthesia at decreasing pain scores compared to patient controlled analgesia for pelvic organ prolapse procedures including posterior colporrhaphy and sacrospinous ligament fixation.
Head to Head comparison of perioperative complications and secondary the impact of operation techniques with or without mesh on patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life.
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. A lot of women have surgery for prolapse. The recurrence rate op pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment is high. Placement of a mesh aims at reducing the recurrence rate, but mesh implants can cause complications. This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of one type of mesh (tensionfree vaginal mesh; Prolift), compared with the standard prolapse surgery. A secondary objective is to track the complications of both procedures. Patients with recurrent prolapse after surgery can participate in this study. A total of 194 women will be included. At random 97 patients undergo a standard prolapse operation and 97 patients undergo an operation with the mesh. Evaluation will take place during surgery, at the postoperative visit after six weeks, and after six months and twelve months. Quality of life, degree of vaginal prolapse, subjective effectiveness, safety and incidence of complications will be evaluated.