Peanut Allergy Clinical Trial
— OLFUS-VIPESOfficial title:
Open-label Follow-up Study of the VIPES Study to Evaluate Long-term Efficacy and Safety of the Viaskin Peanut
Verified date | June 2022 |
Source | DBV Technologies |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objectives of this open-label follow-up study for subjects who previously were randomized and have completed the VIPES study for the treatment of peanut allergy, are: - To assess the efficacy of Viaskin Peanut after up to 36 months of treatment. - To evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with Viaskin Peanut. - To evaluate sustained unresponsiveness to peanut after a period of 2 months without treatment in subjects showing desensitization to peanut after treatment with Viaskin Peanut.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 171 |
Est. completion date | September 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 7 Years to 56 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Adult and pediatric subjects (=7 years) who completed the VIPES study, with a mandatory and documented DBPCFC at Month 12 in the VIPES study. - Signed informed consent from adult subjects or parent(s)/guardian(s) of children <18 years and children's assent for children >7 years or as per country-specific regulations or laws. This consent should be signed no later than Visit 11 in the VIPES study. - Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential at Visit 10 in the VIPES study. - Female subject of childbearing potential must use effective methods of contraception to prevent pregnancy and agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of participation in the study. Documented sexual abstinence will be accepted as an effective method of contraception for girls below 15 years of age. - Subjects and/or parents/guardians willing to comply with all study requirements during their participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: - Severe reaction during the DBPCFC at Month 12 in the VIPES study, defined as need for intubation, hypotension persisting after epinephrine administration, and/or the need for more than two doses of epinephrine. - Pregnancy or lactation. - Females of childbearing potential planning a pregnancy in the coming 2 to 3 years. - Subjects who became allergic to chocolate or who do not want to consume the chocolate study challenge vehicle anymore. - Subjects who developed hypersensitivity to excipients of the Viaskin patches or of the food challenge formula used during the VIPES study. - Inability to discontinue short-acting antihistamines for three days or long-acting antihistamines for five to seven days (depending on half-life) prior to skin prick testing or food challenges. - Subjects with asthma that has evolved and now fulfills any of the criteria defined as follows: - uncontrolled persistent asthma by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Asthma guidelines (2007) or by Global Initiative for Asthma (2011) or being treated with combination therapy of medium dose inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled ß2-agonists. - at least two systemic corticosteroid courses for asthma in the past year or one oral corticosteroid course for asthma in the past three months. - prior intubation for asthma in the past year. - Subjects receiving ß-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy. - Subjects receiving or planning to receive anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy. - Subjects receiving or planning to receive any type of immunotherapy to any food (e.g. oral immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, specific oral tolerance induction) during their participation in the study. - Subjects receiving or planning to receive any aeroallergen immunotherapy during their participation in the study. - Allergy or known history of reaction to Tegaderm® with no possibilities to use an alternative dressing approved by the sponsor. - Subjects suffering from generalized dermatologic disease (e.g. severe atopic dermatitis, uncontrolled generalized eczema, ichthyosis vulgaris) with no intact zones to apply the patches. - Any new disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias. - A history of non compliance in the VIPES study. Non compliance is defined as subjects not applying the patch at all for 60 days or more (this can be either consecutive or intermittent non-application of the patches) during the whole VIPES study duration - Participation in another clinical intervention study in the past year, other than the VIPES study. - Subjects on any experimental drugs in the past year, other than those used in the VIPES study. Other inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Cheema Research Inc. | Mississauga | Ontario |
Canada | Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute | Ottawa | Ontario |
Canada | Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Asthme et Allergie de Québec | Sainte-Foy | Quebec |
Canada | Gordon Sussman Clinical Research | Toronto | Ontario |
France | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin | Bordeaux | |
France | Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul | Lille | |
France | GCS des hôpitaux pédiatriques | Nice | |
France | Hôpital Necker | Paris | |
France | Nouvel Hôpital Civil | Strasbourg | |
France | Hôpitaux De Brabois | Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy | |
Netherlands | Erasmus MC | Rotterdam | |
Netherlands | UMC Utrecht | Utrecht | |
United States | Boston Childrens' Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Children's Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Children's Medical Center Dallas | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | University of California, Rady Childrens Hospital | San Diego | California |
United States | ASTHMA, Inc. | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
DBV Technologies |
United States, Canada, France, Netherlands,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Treatment Responders at Months 12 and 24 | A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose (ED) equal to or greater than 1000 milligram (mg) peanut protein or with at least a 10-fold increase of the ED compared to their initial ED observed at the VIPES baseline, as determined by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at Months 12 and 24. At Month 12, participants had received 24 months of active treatment for those who received Viaskin Peanut in the VIPES study, and 12 months of active treatment for those who received placebo in the VIPES study. At Month 24, participants had received 36 months of active treatment for those who received Viaskin Peanut in the VIPES study, and 24 months of active treatment for those who received placebo in the VIPES study. The percentage of responders at Month 12 and Month 24 are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | Month 12 and Month 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Unresponsive to a Cumulative Dose of at Least 1440 mg Peanut Protein at Month 24 | Participants were considered unresponsive if they showed no objective symptoms leading to stopping the challenge during the Month 24 DBPCFC with a cumulative dose of at least 1440 mg of peanut protein, up to a cumulative dose of 5044 mg peanut protein. The percentage of unresponsive participants is presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | Month 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Unresponsiveness to a Cumulative Dose of at Least 1440 mg Peanut Protein at Month 26 | Participants who were unresponsive to a cumulative dose of 1440 mg of peanut protein or above at the Month 24 DBPCFC, had an additional 2-month period without treatment and continued on a peanut-free diet to assess for sustained unresponsiveness by a DBPCFC at Month 26. The percentage of participants with this sustained unresponsiveness, i.e, who showed no objective symptoms leading to stopping the challenge during the DBPCFC to a cumulative dose of 1440 mg of peanut protein or above at Month 26, are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | Month 26 (2 months post-treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Median Cumulative Reactive Dose of Peanut Protein at Months 12 and 24 | The cumulative reactive dose was defined as the sum of all peanut protein doses taken by the participant during the DBPCFC. To distinguish participants who reached the highest dose of the DBPCFC without objective symptoms 1000 mg was added to the cumulative reactive dose to obtain an adjusted value. The median cumulative reactive doses at Months 12 and 24 are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | Month 12 and Month 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Mean Cumulative Reactive Dose of Peanut Protein at Months 12 and 24 | The cumulative reactive dose was defined as the sum of all peanut protein doses taken by the participant during the DBPCFC. To distinguish participants who reached the highest dose of the DBPCFC without objective symptoms 1000 mg was added to the cumulative reactive dose to obtain an adjusted value. The mean cumulative reactive doses at Months 12 and 24 are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | Month 12 and Month 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Change From VIPES Baseline in Peanut-Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The change from the VIPES Baseline in peanut-specific IgE values at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 of the OLFUS-VIPES study are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | VIPES Baseline to Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Change From VIPES Baseline in Peanut-Specific Immunoglobulin G Subtype 4 (IgG4) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The change from the VIPES Baseline in peanut-specific IgG4 values at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 of the OLFUS-VIPES study are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | VIPES Baseline to Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study | |
Secondary | Change From VIPES Baseline in Wheal Diameter During Skin Prick Testing at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The change from the VIPES Baseline in the wheal diameter from the undiluted skin prick tests at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 of the OLFUS-VIPES study are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study. | VIPES Baseline to Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 (end of treatment) in the OLFUS-VIPES study |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05667610 -
Immune-supportive Diet and Gut Permeability in Allergic Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05440643 -
Peanut Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)-Tablet for Treatment of Peanut Allergy
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03849079 -
Validation of the HYPONUT Product
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02979600 -
Clinical and Biological Efficacy of Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01950533 -
The Utility of Food-Specific IgE Measured With the IMMULITE 2000 Assay to Predict Symptomatic Food Allergy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04415593 -
High and Low Dose Oral Peanut Immunotherapy - Comparison of Efficacy and Safety
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04511494 -
Oral Immunotherapy for Young Children With Peanut Allergy - Small Children OIT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04887441 -
Allergology: Information, Data and Knowledge Organization
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04881773 -
Oral Low Doses Tolerance INduction Study for Peanuts
|
||
Completed |
NCT03682770 -
Study in Pediatric Subjects With Peanut Allergy to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab as Adjunct to AR101 (Peanut Oral Immunotherapy)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03703791 -
Real World, Open Label, QOL Assessment of Peanut Immunotherapy AR101 in Children and Adolescents
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02916446 -
Safety Study of Viaskin Peanut to Treat Peanut Allergy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02402231 -
Treatment of Severe Peanut Allergy With Xolair (Omalizumab) and Oral Immunotherapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03337542 -
AR101 Real-World Open-Label Extension Study
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05476497 -
Phase I Trial to Evaluate VLP Peanut in Healthy and Peanut Allergic Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03648320 -
The Grown Up Peanut Immunotherapy Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03292484 -
Longer-term Study of AR101 in Subjects Who Participated in a Prior AR101 Study (ARC008)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03852342 -
Reactive Doses and Times During Oral Food Challenge to Peanut
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05138757 -
Pinpoint Trial: Prebiotics IN Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03352726 -
A Study to Assess the Biological Potency of Peanut Allergen Extract in Adolescent and Adult Peanut Allergic Subjects
|
Phase 1 |