View clinical trials related to Peanut Allergy.
Filter by:This is a phase 1, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult participants with peanut allergy. Participants will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either an escalating dose of INT301 or placebo. The treatment group will be blinded to the investigator, participants, and the Intrommune study team.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether allowing ingestion of sub-threshold amounts of peanut in those with a high threshold (tolerate at least 143 mg peanut protein on supervised double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge [DBPCFC]) will be associated with attaining even higher thresholds over time in children with high threshold peanut allergy compared to those avoiding peanut. The secondary clinical objectives include assessing the development of sustained unresponsiveness (SU, a surrogate term for tolerance without daily ingestion), effects on quality of life, and safety compared to those avoiding peanut. Additionally, this study will phenotype the allergic response to peanut based on threshold and response to exposure. Mechanistic study objectives will determine the immune and molecular basis of the high threshold endotype, identify predictors of response to exposure, and determine mechanisms and biomarkers of remission.
Peanut allergy is a growing public health problem in developed countries with more and more hospitalizations for anaphylaxis. It has been determined that sensitization to certain peanut proteins such as rAra h 2, is predictive of allergy and could predict the severity of reaction (anaphylaxis) during Oral food challenges (OFC). So far, consensual threshold for cutaneous test and IgE as predictor in the positivity of OFC have not been determined. Identification of reactive doses for OFC and phenotype of patients would help to personalize management of patients subgroups, with an optimal security.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the tolerability of peanut protein in pediatric patients (6-17 years old) treated with dupilumab monotherapy, in which tolerability is defined as the proportion of patients who safely pass a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at week 24. The secondary objectives are: - To determine whether dupilumab treatment improves peanut tolerability, defined as a change in the cumulative tolerated dose (log transformed) of peanut protein during a DBPCFC - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab treatment in peanut allergic patients - To evaluate the effects of dupilumab treatment on the levels of peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) - To evaluate the treatment effect of dupilumab on the average wheal size after a titrated skin prick test (SPT), as measured by area under curve (AUC) of the average wheal size induced by peanut extract at different concentrations - To assess the incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to dupilumab in patients over time
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ASP0892 after intradermal (ID) injection in adolescent participants with peanut allergy.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of AR101 in peanut-allergic children aged 1 to < 4 years.
Primary objective is to assess whether dupilumab as adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo improves desensitization at the completion of up-dosing, defined as an increase in the proportion of participants who pass a post up-dosing double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at visit 16. Secondary objectives are: - To assess whether dupilumab as adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo improves desensitization at the completion of up-dosing, defined as an increase in the cumulative tolerated dose (log transformed) of peanut protein during a post up-dosing DBPCFC at visit 16 - To assess whether dupilumab as (indefinite [continuously]) adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo maintains desensitization, defined as an increase in the proportion of participants who pass a post maintenance DBPCFC at visit 22 - To assess whether dupilumab as (limited [previously]) adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo maintains desensitization, defined as an increase in the proportion of participants who pass a post maintenance DBPCFC at visit 22 - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab as adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo - To assess the effect of dupilumab (compared to placebo) as adjunct to AR101 on the change in peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE), Immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), and peanut-specific IgG4/IgE ratio - To assess if dupilumab increases the tolerability of AR101 as measured by the daily symptoms (electronic diary [e-diary]) during the up-dosing phase
This prospective, cross-sectional study was designed to improve understanding of how early-life introduction of peanuts may promote the maintenance of tolerance in adolescence and will serve as an additional safety evaluation of the original nutritional intervention.
People who are undergoing oral immunotherapy for food allergy treatment can feel anxious about the treatment process, particularly when they have allergic responses (e.g., hives, vomiting, nausea) during the dosing process. People may commonly believe that these symptoms are simply side effects that must be endured or avoided. However, the investigators propose that changing participants' mindsets about the meaning of symptoms—toward viewing them as a sign that the treatment is working and desensitization is increasing—during the treatment process will reduce anxiety and improve treatment outcomes.
The study aims to assess the biological potency of the In-House Reference Preparation (IHRP) of peanut allergens extract by a quantitative Skin Prick Test (SPT) method in peanut-allergic subjects.