Patellofemoral Pain Clinical Trial
— PFP-InhibitOfficial title:
The Role of Arthrogenic Muscular Inhibition in Patellofemoral Pain and the Response to an Exercise Programme
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most diagnosed condition in individuals with knee
complaints. Studies revealed that one third of individuals with PFP suffer from persistent
complaints, indicating that current treatments fail to prevent the chronicity of symptoms.
Considering that current treatment-strategies of patients with PFP seem to be unable to
avoid the development of chronic symptoms, the question arises if the underlying factors of
PFP are understood sufficiently. Current research focuses predominantly on muscle strength
assessment by means of a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), even though, weakness might
not only be caused by a reduced voluntary contraction but also by an involuntary ability to
contract the muscle fully, which is named arthrogenous muscular inhibition (AMI). Although
AMI has been proven to be present in a wide range of knee joint pathologies to date it
remains unclear whether patients with PFP are weak or inhibited. It remains also unclear if
there exists a causal link between AMI and biomechanical alterations.
Previous studies investigated the influence of exercise treatment on muscular strength,
function and pain. However, to date no study investigated the influence of the currently
recommended exercise treatment on AMI. Thus, the analysis of the effect of a 6 week exercise
treatment might yield further insights if a specific exercise treatment can reduce AMI,
improve functional performance and reduce pain.
Methods: The investigators will invite 40 participants with PFP and 40 healthy controls to
take part in the study. As a basis investigation kinematic, kinetic measures, and surface
electromyographic (sEMG) of 4 lower limb muscles will be taken during functional tasks.
Muscle strength and AMI of the quadriceps, muscle flexibility, and a posture assessment of
the patella as well as the foot will be carried out. All participants with PFP will then
receive a 6 week exercise programme to follow. After six weeks, the participants with PFP
will attend the Salford university, where they will be reassessed.
Expected outcomes: The study will investigate if AMI is present in participants with PFP and
if AMI is directly linked to functional performance. In addition this study will investigate
if a specific exercise treatment can reduce AMI and improve functional performance.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | October 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria for patients with PFP: 1. Reproducible pain with at least two of these activities: ascending or descending stairs or ramps, squatting, kneeling, prolonged sitting, hopping/ jumping, isometric quadriceps contraction or running 2. Clearly defined pain location in the peripatellar region 3. Reports of pain greater than 1 month duration. 4. They are able to perform squatting, running and MVC task- Participant response 5. Age range: 18-45 years old Inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers: 1. Healthy and without any previous lower limb injuries 2. The participant is able to perform squatting, running and MVC task Exclusion Criteria for all participants: 1. Previous history of knee surgery 2. Previous history of (traumatic) patella dislocation or instability 3. Previous history of ligamentous instabilities 4. Previous history of traumatic, inflammatory or infectious pathology in the lower extremity 5. Previous history of internal derangement or other causes 6. Previous diagnosed degenerative conditions in the knee 7. Exclusion if patients cannot perform running, step down, or MVC task. 8. Exclusion criteria for the healthy control group are: clinical evidence of other knee injury or knee pain, and current significant injury affecting other lower extremity joints. |
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | University of Salford | Salford | Greater Manchester |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Salford | Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust |
United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Extent of the arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) | AMI will be calculated from the ratio: AMI = (resting twitch size in Nm/ twitch size during MVC in Nm)*100 AMI will be expressed in %. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. |
6 weeks | No |
Primary | quadriceps/ hamstrings cocontraction | The cocontraction of the quadriceps (vastus medialis and lateralis) and the hamstring (biceps femoris and semitendinosus) was calculated by the formula developed by Heiden et al. 2009, whereby 0 expresses no cocontraction and 1 a complete cocontraction. The cocontraction will be calculated for for the early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task. Differences between the baseline of participants with PFP and after 6 weeks after the treatment will be investigated. Furthermore, the correlation between the external knee adduction moment (EKAM) to AMI will be investigated. |
6 weeks | No |
Primary | Presence of the break phenomenon | The break phenomenon is defined as a trace dip during the eccentric quadriceps phase, which exceeds more than 10% of the pre-break moment. The break phenomenon will be defined as either: present or not present. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal knee adduction angle | The maximal knee adduction angle will be given for the early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed in degrees. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal knee adductor moment (EKAM) | The maximal knee adductor moment will be given as % of the bodyweight (BW). The maximal EKAM will be investigated for early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | the knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) | knee adduction angular impulse is defined as the integral of the knee adduction moment-time curve. The normalised KAAI will be given as % of the bodyweight (BW). The KAAI will be given for early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal knee internal rotation | The maximal knee internal rotation angle will be given for the early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed in degrees. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal knee internal rotation moment | The maximal knee internal rotation moment will be given as % of the bodyweight (BW). The maximal knee internal rotation moment will be investigated for early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed as % of the bodyweight (BW). The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal hip adduction angle | The maximal hip adduction angle will be given for the early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed in degrees. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal hip adduction moment | The maximal hip adductor moment will be given as % of the bodyweight (BW). The maximal hip adductor moment will be investigated for early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed as % of the bodyweight (BW). The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal hip internal rotation | The maximal hip internal rotation angle will be given for the early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed in degrees. The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Primary | Maximal hip internal moment | The maximal hip internal rotation moment will be given as % of the bodyweight (BW). The maximal hip internal rotation moment will be investigated for early, mid, late stance phase, the single leg squat and single leg step down task and will be expressed as % of the bodyweight (BW). The differences between the baseline measurements and the measurements after 6 weeks of treatments will be investigated in participants with PFP. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | temporo-spatial parameters: speed | The gait speed will be analysed and expressed as mean and SD. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | temporo-spatial parameters: step length | The step length will be analysed and expressed as mean and SD. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Muscle strength: peak strength during the eccentric quadriceps task | The peak strength will be measured during the eccentric quadriceps testing (Kin Com). | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Muscle strength: peak strength during the isometric quadriceps task | The peak strength will be measured during the isometric quadriceps testing (Kin Com). | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | KOOS, AKPS, Tampa scale questionnaires | Only patients with PFP will be asked to fill them. For each of the questionnaires a normalized score will be calculated for each subscale. The differences of the overall score will be calculated to ensure that confounding factors, such as kinesiophobia are controlled and checked. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Foot posture | The results of the 6-item foot posture index will be summarised, whereby a negative result expresses a supinated and a positive result a pronated foot. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Lateral/ medial displacement of the patella | The lateral/ medial displacement of the patella will be measured and expressed in cm. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Lateral/ medial tilt of the patella | The lateral/ medial tilt of the patella will be measured and on a scale from -2 (strongly laterally tilted) to 2 (strongly medially tilted) | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Flexibility of the quadriceps | The quadriceps flexibility will be assessed by using the modified Thomas test and will be expressed in degrees of the knee flexion. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Flexibility of the hamstrings | The hamstrings flexibility will be assessed by using the active knee extension test and will be expressed in degrees of the knee flexion. | 6 weeks | No |
Secondary | Flexibility of the ankle range of motion. | The ankle flexibility will be assessed by using the weight bearing lunge test and will be expressed in degrees of the ankle dorsalflexion and in cm, by measuring the distance of the 1st toe to the wall. | 6 weeks | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06197958 -
Comparison of Concentric-eccentric Exercises in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05497661 -
Ultrasound Patellar Tendon Assessment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05403944 -
Strength or Power Training for Patellofemoral Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05576064 -
Is Gait Analysis for Proposed Rotational Deformities a Useful Resource
|
||
Completed |
NCT04099004 -
Neural Correlates of Knee Sensorimotor Control in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03743519 -
The Efficacy of a Tart Cherry Drink for the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain in Recreational Athletes.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00662493 -
A Comparison of Two Exercise Programs on Knee Motor Control
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05285007 -
Limited Ankle Dorsiflexion and Effect on Single Limb Squats in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05501210 -
Vibration on Patellofemoral Joint Pain After ACLR
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02914574 -
The Patellofemoral Pain Functional Performance Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05471089 -
Long-term Effects of the Addition of Diathermy by Emission of Radiofrequency to Therapeutic Exercise in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Patients
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05976269 -
Bilateral Knee Pain and Dry Needling
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02025400 -
Internet Enhanced, Patient-Centered Orthopedic Care: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05811637 -
Investigation of the Effect of Pilates Exercises on Patellofemoral Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03392688 -
Time Difference Between Onsets of Lateral And Medial Hamstring Muscles During Gait in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05995210 -
Comparing the Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping and Knee Orthosis in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
|
N/A |