Partial-thickness Burn Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® and Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds: PermeaDerm® (PermeaDerm, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA) and silver impregnated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®, Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden)
In this prospective, randomized parallel study, the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds will be compared: PermeaDerm®, and silver coated foam dressing Mepilex Ag®.This study is therefore considered a minimal risk study. Procedures related to research apart from randomization to one of the dressings, will include review of medical records, non-invasive wound and scar assessments and additional photographs. 60 patients with partial thickness burns meeting the inclusion criteria of the study will be enrolled to receive either PermeaDerm® (n=30) or silver coated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®; n=30) in an outpatient or observational setting. Prior to placement of wound dressings, baseline assessments of wound size and burn depth will be performed by the experienced physician and documented using photography and when indicated laser Doppler (Moor Laser Speckle®, Moor Instruments, Devon, UK) measurements. Time to heal will be defined as the time after which complete re-epithelialization is reached and PermeaDerm® detaches or there are no more changes of Mepilex Ag® needed. Secondary goals of the study are to assess pain, and scarring associated with the use of the different dressings in our burn patients, as well as to assess cost-effectiveness of the therapy. Pain will be assessed at every patient visit using visual analog scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker FACES respectively; mid and long-term scar development is assessed at approximately 1 and 6 months after enrollment in the study using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and DermaLab Combo® (Cortex Technology, Denmark). ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05824026 -
Investigation of the Clinical Performance of Biatain Fiber Ag on Burns
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03709069 -
Effect of Enteral Albumin on Healing of Superficial Partial Thickness Fresh Flame Burns of Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04839523 -
Performance and Safety of Exufiber Ag+ and Exufiber on Partial Thickness Burns
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03190655 -
Efficacy and Safety of Aluminaid Versus Hydrogel Wound Dressings
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03564795 -
Effectiveness of KeraStat Gel for Improved Cosmesis of Partial Thickness Burns
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04880655 -
A Randomized Trial Evaluating EARLY Application of a Surfactant Dressing in Thermal Injury (EARLY)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02519621 -
NPWT PRO vs KCI Ulta® NPWT and to Compare NPWT PRO vs NPWT PRO With Simultaneous Irrigation on Wound Healing
|
N/A |