Partial Edentulism Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical, Radiographic, and Histological Comparison of Healing After Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft With Two Different Xenogeneic Membranes
The purpose of the study is to compare one material called "Mucograft" with another material called "Dynamatrix." These materials are used as a type of a barrier (made from pig material also known as porcine material) in a preservation technique to increase the thickness and width of tissues at a tooth extraction site. The investigators want to see if one works better than the other or if they work equally as well. These materials are made up of collagens, which are naturally occurring proteins found in the skin, specifically connective tissue. Dynamatrix is made up of many types of collagens whereas Mucograft is only made of fewer collagens. These materials have been given something called a 510(k) status by the FDA. This means that the FDA determines them to be equivalent to another product that they have previously approved. You will be put into one of two groups at random, and will not know which one you are in. Like flipping a coin, you will have a 50/50 chance to be in either one of the two groups. You will either be in a group using Mucograft or in a group using Dynamatrix. Both of these materials are regularly used in the dental clinics.
A) Aim/Hypothesis/Objective The objective of this study is to compare two different
membranes, Mucograft and Dynamatrix, clinically, radiographically, and histologically when
used for the ridge preservation procedure in combination with bone allograft at the
extraction site in terms of soft and hard tissue remodeling after 4 months healing period.
Hypothesis
1. MucograftTM will exhibit greater increase or preservation of the thickness and width of
keratinized tissue than DynamatrixTM at the extraction site.
2. MucograftTM will exhibit greater preservation of the alveolar bone width and height than
DynamatrixTM at the extraction site.
3. MucograftTM will exhibit greater preservation of the soft and hard tissue height than
DynamatrixTM at the adjacent teeth.
4. MucograftTM will exhibit a better outcome than DynamatrixTM in the histological and
histomorphometric results of the soft and hard tissue healing.
Specific Aims
1. Primary aim The primary aim is to compare MucograftTM when used as a barrier membrane in
the ridge preservation technique to increase or preserve the thickness and width of
keratinized tissue at the extraction site in comparison to DynamatrixTM.
2. Secondary aims
The secondary aims are to compare clinically, radiographically, and histologically
MucograftTM with DynamatrixTM in relation to:
1. Changes of the alveolar bone height and width at the extraction site.
2. Changes of the soft and hard tissues at the adjacent teeth.
3. Histological and histomorphometric assessment of the soft and hard tissue healing at the
extraction site.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00713206 -
Prospective Study of NanoTite Implants Placed Into Fresh Sinus-Lift Augmentation Sites (VSSL)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03283241 -
Zolidd One ExHex Dental Implant Compared to Uncoated One ExHex Dental Implant in Subjects With Partial Edentulism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00728884 -
Study of Certain Prevail Implants Used to Treat All Types of Edentulism in the Maxilla and Mandible
|
||
Completed |
NCT01529775 -
Randomized Study of Osseotite Certain Tapered Prevails vs. Osseotite Certain Tapered
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03934853 -
Study to Confirm Accuracy and Safety of the Inliant Surgical Navigation System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03769376 -
Histologic Comparison of Healing After Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Two Different Xenografts
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01953991 -
OHQoL With Removable Partial Dentures; a Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02387970 -
Immediate or Delayed Provisionalization in Posterior Healed Sites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02158377 -
TM vs TSV Implants Loaded Early vs Conventional in Anterior and Posterior Areas
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01324778 -
Multi Centre Study Comparing OsseoSpeed TX With OsseoSpeed
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02188212 -
Nobel Procera Crown Shaded Zirconia and NobelProceraTM Full Contour Crown IPS e.Max CAD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00728754 -
A Study of Certain Prevail Implants Used for the Preservation of Crestal Bone in Short Fixed Bridge Cases.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00728962 -
A Study of Osseotite Certain Prevail Implants Used to Support Short Fixed Bridges With Immediate Occlusal Loading.
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03558347 -
CF41102 5-year Clinical Evaluation of Conelog® Implant With 7 mm Length
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02590861 -
Improving Oral Health Function With Implant Supported Partial Dentures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02507661 -
Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation on Implant Esthetic Outcomes
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02703168 -
Long-term Performance of SLActive Implants After Immediate or Early Loading
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02404649 -
Comparing Conventional Dental Implants and Trabecular Metalâ„¢ Dental Implants After Sinus Floor Elevation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01529814 -
Assessment of Integration Success of an Implant System With a Novel Abutment Attachment Design in Early Loaded Cases
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00782171 -
Evaluation of Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants With a Modified Surface
|
Phase 4 |