Pancreatitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
To Assess the Comparative Efficacy of Full Calorie Regular Diet (RD) Versus Clear Liquid Diet (CLD) on Length of Hospital Stay (LOHS) for Mild to Moderate Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
NCT number | NCT04932785 |
Other study ID # | HS-20-00375 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | July 18, 2021 |
Est. completion date | July 2024 |
Acute pancreatitis is among the most common gastroenterology diagnosis in the United States, and represents a large economic burden to the United States health system. While recent guidelines agree early feeding shortens length of stay, these guidelines fail to provide recommendations on optimal diet to start leaving diet type to clinician discretion. Therefore, the aim is to assess the comparative efficacy of full calorie regular diet (RD) versus clear liquid diet (CLD) on length of hospital stay (LOHS) for mild to moderate acute pancreatitis (AP). The study population will target mild to moderate acute pancreatitis patients who can tolerate eating in a single institution. The primary end point will focus on LOHS, and secondary end points will include Pancreatic Activity Scoring System, side effects and readmission.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 150 |
Est. completion date | July 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. >18 years of age 2. Presentation with acute pancreatitis as defined by two of three criterion per the Revised Atlanta Criteria guidelines: (a) Amylase or lipase > 3x the upper limit of normal, b) Classical abdominal pain, c) Ultrasound or computed tomography of unequivocal pancreatitis. Such radiographic findings include swelling, edema, or heterogeneity of the gland or peripancreatic fluid or stranding Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women 2. Incarcerated patients 3. Patients < 18 years of age 4. Patient unable or unwilling to give informed consent 5. Patients transferred from another hospital 6. The possibility of poor oral intake for reasons other than acute pancreatitis (e.g. intubation, failure to pass an indicated swallow study for aspiration risk, anorexia secondary to active malignancy, etc) 7. Surgical intervention for infected pancreatic necrosis or pancreatic hemorrhage 8. Chronic pancreatitis based on radiographic evidence 9. Severe pancreatitis based on Revised Atlanta Criteria. Under Revised Atlanta Criteria, patients will be excluded if they have a composite Modified Marshall >2 10. Etiologies of hypertriglyceridemia, trauma and autoimmune pancreatitis will be excluded |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | LAC+USC Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Southern California |
United States,
American Diabetes Association. 15. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S193-S202. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S015. — View Citation
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25. — View Citation
Buxbaum J, Quezada M, Chong B, Gupta N, Yu CY, Lane C, Da B, Leung K, Shulman I, Pandol S, Wu B. The Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System predicts clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: findings from a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;113(5):755-764. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0048-1. Epub 2018 Mar 15. — View Citation
Crockett S, Falck-Ytter Y, Wani S, Gardner TB. Acute Pancreatitis Guideline. Gastroenterology. 2018 Mar;154(4):1102. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 2. No abstract available. — View Citation
Eatock FC, Chong P, Menezes N, Murray L, McKay CJ, Carter CR, Imrie CW. A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;100(2):432-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40587.x. — View Citation
Greenberg JA, Hsu J, Bawazeer M, Marshall J, Friedrich JO, Nathens A, Coburn N, May GR, Pearsall E, McLeod RS. Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Can J Surg. 2016 Apr;59(2):128-40. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015015. — View Citation
Horibe M, Iwasaki E, Nakagawa A, Matsuzaki J, Minami K, Machida Y, Tamagawa H, Takimoto Y, Ueda M, Katayama T, Kawasaki S, Matsushita M, Seino T, Fukuhara S, Kanai T. Efficacy and safety of immediate oral intake in patients with mild acute pancreatitis: A randomized controlled trial. Nutrition. 2020 Jun;74:110724. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110724. Epub 2020 Jan 15. — View Citation
Jacobson BC, Vander Vliet MB, Hughes MD, Maurer R, McManus K, Banks PA. A prospective, randomized trial of clear liquids versus low-fat solid diet as the initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;5(8):946-51; quiz 886. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Jul 5. — View Citation
Jenkins A, Shapiro J. Clinical Guideline Highlights for the Hospitalist: Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Hospitalized Adult. J Hosp Med. 2019 Dec 1;14(12):764-765. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3324. Epub 2019 Oct 23. — View Citation
Khan S, Ranjha WA, Tariq H, Nawaz H. Efficacy of early oral refeeding in patients of mild acute pancreatitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):899-902. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12338. — View Citation
Larino-Noia J, Lindkvist B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seijo-Rios S, Iglesias-Canle J, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Early and/or immediately full caloric diet versus standard refeeding in mild acute pancreatitis: a randomized open-label trial. Pancreatology. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 14. — View Citation
Li J, Xue GJ, Liu YL, Javed MA, Zhao XL, Wan MH, Chen GY, Altaf K, Huang W, Tang WF. Early oral refeeding wisdom in patients with mild acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2013 Jan;42(1):88-91. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182575fb5. — View Citation
Meier R, Beglinger C, Layer P, Gullo L, Keim V, Laugier R, Friess H, Schweitzer M, Macfie J; ESPEN Consensus Group. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in acute pancreatitis. European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2002 Apr;21(2):173-83. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2002.0543. No abstract available. — View Citation
Mirtallo JM, Forbes A, McClave SA, Jensen GL, Waitzberg DL, Davies AR; International Consensus Guideline Committee Pancreatitis Task Force. International consensus guidelines for nutrition therapy in pancreatitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 May;36(3):284-91. doi: 10.1177/0148607112440823. Epub 2012 Mar 28. — View Citation
Moraes JM, Felga GE, Chebli LA, Franco MB, Gomes CA, Gaburri PD, Zanini A, Chebli JM. A full solid diet as the initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis is safe and result in a shorter length of hospitalization: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;44(7):517-22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181c986b3. — View Citation
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Lund JL, Dellon ES, Williams JL, Jensen ET, Shaheen NJ, Barritt AS, Lieber SR, Kochar B, Barnes EL, Fan YC, Pate V, Galanko J, Baron TH, Sandler RS. Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):254-272.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063. Epub 2018 Oct 10. Erratum In: Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1936. — View Citation
Rajkumar N, Karthikeyan VS, Ali SM, Sistla SC, Kate V. Clear liquid diet vs soft diet as the initial meal in patients with mild acute pancreatitis: a randomized interventional trial. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Jun;28(3):365-70. doi: 10.1177/0884533612466112. Epub 2012 Dec 13. — View Citation
Sathiaraj E, Murthy S, Mansard MJ, Rao GV, Mahukar S, Reddy DN. Clinical trial: oral feeding with a soft diet compared with clear liquid diet as initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):777-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03794.x. — View Citation
Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Erratum In: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):302. — View Citation
Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4 Suppl 2):e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063. — View Citation
Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology; Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2005 May;54 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii1-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.057026. No abstract available. — View Citation
Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068. — View Citation
Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Isaji S, Wada K, Itoi T, Sata N, Gabata T, Igarashi H, Kataoka K, Hirota M, Kadoya M, Kitamura N, Kimura Y, Kiriyama S, Shirai K, Hattori T, Takeda K, Takeyama Y, Hirota M, Sekimoto M, Shikata S, Arata S, Hirata K. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Jun;22(6):405-32. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.259. Epub 2015 May 13. — View Citation
* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Length of Hospitalization Stay | Length of Hospitalization Stay will be measured as defined as from time of admission to time of discharge for regular diet vs. clear liquid diet | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Oral Intolerance | Proportion who cannot tolerate assigned diet requiring cessation or change due to worsened nausea, vomiting and pain | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Intensive Care Unit admission and interventions | Intensive Care Unit admission and intervention including intubation and vasopressors | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Local complications | Local complications including pancreatic necrosis, abscess, or pseudocysts | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Development of severe pancreatitis | Development of severe pancreatitis as defined by the Revised Atlanta Classification (persistent single or multiple organ failure at >48 hours) | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Development of severe pancreatitis | Development of severe pancreatitis as defined by the Modified Marshall Score (Score 0-4, with 4 being most severe and worse outcome) | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Change in Pancreatic Activity Scoring System Score | Change in Pancreatic Activity Scoring System Score, from 0 to >250 (max score, where a max score is worse) | From date of randomization until the date of discharge at 24, 48, 72 hours and at discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Calorie and fat intake | Calorie and fat intake per group based on percent finished meal documented by nursing staff at 24, 48, and 72 hours. | From date of randomization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 24 months | |
Secondary | 30 day hospital readmission | Hospital readmission within 30 days | From date of discharge to 30 days after discharge |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03609944 -
SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04652271 -
International Pancreatic Surgery Outcomes Study - PancreasGroup.Org
|
||
Completed |
NCT01441492 -
Pancreas Resection With and Without Drains
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02196935 -
Los Angeles Prospective GI Biliary and EUS Series
|
||
Completed |
NCT01476995 -
Prognostic Indicators as Provided by the EPIC ClearView
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01545167 -
The North American Pancreatitis Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04168801 -
Early Oral Refeeding in Mild Acute Pancreatitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03334708 -
A Study of Blood Based Biomarkers for Pancreas Adenocarcinoma
|
||
Completed |
NCT01824186 -
Trial Comparing Pain in Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00428025 -
Diclofenac for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Higher Risk Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00639314 -
Trial on the Evaluation of Pylorus-ring in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160836 -
Biliary Tissue Sampling Using a Cytology Brush or the GIUM Catheter
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00121901 -
Does Glyceryl Nitrate Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) Pancreatitis?
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00999232 -
Assess the Effect of Erythromycin on the Rate of Success in Placement of a Self-propelled Feeding Tube
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00419549 -
Efficacy Study of Glyceryl-Trinitrate Patch and Parecoxib (Valdecoxib) for the Prevention of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05095831 -
EUS Shear Wave for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
|
||
Completed |
NCT03601325 -
Acute Pancreatitis: Study of Possible Etiologies and Risk Factors Affecting Outcome
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT02465138 -
A Randomized Controlled Trial of IV Ketorolac to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06133023 -
WONDER-02 Trial: Plastic Stent vs. Lumen-apposing Metal Stent for Pancreatic Pseudocysts
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02971475 -
ESWL Versus ESWL and Endoscopic Treatment
|
N/A |