High Volume Lactated Ringer's Solution and Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Perioperative Intravenous Administration of High Volume Lactated Ringer's Solution and the Risk of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02050048
• Other study ID #: EH 13-130
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
• Start date: January 2014
• Est. completion date: January 2016

Study information

• Verified date: August 2019
• Source: NorthShore University HealthSystem
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether giving large amounts of intravenous (IV) fluids will reduce the risk of developing a complication known as post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Pancreatitis is inflammation of the pancreas, and it is the most frequent serious complication of ERCP. Typically, a small amount of IV fluids are given during this procedure (~ 1 liter). We are testing whether using a larger amount of fluids (2 - 3 liters) will reduce the risk of PEP.

Description:

This trial is designed as a phase II/III study. The phase II portion of the trial will be completed to establish safety and efficacy data prior to proceeding with a phase III study. The phase II trial will enroll 110 patients that are undergoing elective ERCP as outpatients. Following the phase II portion, if the data suggests that the intervention arm (high volume group) is safe, the investigators will begin enrolling patients who are undergoing ERCP in a more urgent setting as inpatients.

We plan on enrolling 1,400 consecutive high risk patients undergoing ERCP. We are assuming a baseline PEP risk of 9.2%. Fluid administration will be based on Ideal Body Weight (IBW) in order to standardize the aggressive fluid administration across all body weights and reduce the potential for adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes.

All participants will be monitored for 90 minutes following their procedure to assess the development of any adverse symptoms. Analysis by a data safety monitoring board (DSMB) will take place throughout the study. The DSMB is comprised of a panel of experts independent of NorthShore University HealthSystem.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 26
• Est. completion date: January 2016
• Est. primary completion date: January 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients to be included in the study are those undergoing ERCP with the following:

• Clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

• History of post-ERCP pancreatitis (at least one episode)

• Pancreatic sphincterotomy

• Pre-cut (access) sphincterotomy

• Ampullectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

• Age < 18 years old

• Intrauterine pregnancy or breastfeeding mother

• Congestive heart failure

• Advanced/symptomatic coronary artery disease

• Known ascites

• Renal failure

• Active or recent gastrointestinal hemorrhage

• Acute pancreatitis within 72 hours prior to ERCP

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pancreatitis

Intervention

Other:
• Administration of Lactated Ringer's (LR) Solution
Patients will be randomized to low volume or high volume group. Patient in the low volume group will receive fluids via infusion at a rate of 1.5 cc/kg/hr. Fluid administration may be continued through the 90 minute post-procedure observation period. Patients in the high volume group will receive fluids via infusion by the following weight based regimen: initial bolus of LR prior to ERCP of 7.5 cc/kg over 1 hour LR fluid infusion during the procedure at 5 cc/kg/hr Post-procedure bolus of 20 cc/kg over 90 minutes

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	NorthShore University HealthSystem	Evanston	Illinois
United States	NorthShore University HealthSystem	Highland Park	Illinois
United States	Medical College of Wisconsin	Milwaukee	Wisconsin
United States	Minnesota Gastroenterology	Plymouth	Minnesota
United States	University of Utah Health Care	Salt Lake City	Utah
United States	Advocate Health Care	Skokie	Illinois

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
NorthShore University HealthSystem	Advocate Health Care, Allina Health System, Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Utah

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (11)

Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Arif M, Szary NM, Puli SR, Othman MO, Pais WP, Antillon MR, Roy PK. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.039. Review. — View Citation

de-Madaria E, Soler-Sala G, Sánchez-Payá J, Lopez-Font I, Martínez J, Gómez-Escolar L, Sempere L, Sánchez-Fortún C, Pérez-Mateo M. Influence of fluid therapy on the prognosis of acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct;106(10):1843-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.236. Epub 2011 Aug 30. — View Citation

Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL; U.S. Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy (USCORE). A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1414-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111103. — View Citation

Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF, Meyerson SM, Geenen JE. Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Mar;57(3):291-4. — View Citation

Feurer ME, Adler DG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: review of current preventive strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012 May;28(3):280-6. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283528e68. Review. — View Citation

Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, Overby CS, Aas J, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Shaw MJ, Snady HW, Erickson RV, Moore JP, Roel JP. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Oct;54(4):425-34. — View Citation

Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26;335(13):909-18. — View Citation

Gardner TB, Vege SS, Pearson RK, Chari ST. Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct;6(10):1070-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 10. Review. — View Citation

Nasr JY, Papachristou GI. Early fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: a lot more than just fluids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):633-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Mar 21. — View Citation

Warndorf MG, Kurtzman JT, Bartel MJ, Cox M, Mackenzie T, Robinson S, Burchard PR, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. Early fluid resuscitation reduces morbidity among patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.032. Epub 2011 Apr 8. — View Citation

Wu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, Repas K, Delee R, Yu S, Smith B, Banks PA, Conwell DL. Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):710-717.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 May 12. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Development of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis	Patients will be monitored after procedure to see if they develop abdominal pain. If so, serum amylase and lipase blood draws will be completed at least once every 24 hours following procedure to monitor the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. If patients do not develop abdominal pain following the procedure, research staff will follow up with the patients 5 days and 29 days after the procedure to evaluate for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis and other related or unrelated complications.	Assessed 90 minutes after procedure, 5 days after procedure, and 29 days after procedure
Secondary	Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Fluid Overload	A portion of the study will assess whether there is a significant risk of adverse events related to fluid overload states in the high volume (HV) intervention arm. We anticipate the rate of adverse events in patients randomized to the HV arm to be small. By using more modest, weight based regimens, we aim to optimize benefit while eliminating overly aggressive fluid administration and causing undue harm.	Phase II portion (~1 year)