View clinical trials related to Pancreatitis.
Filter by:The overall goal of this ongoing registry study is to optimize initial evaluation and treatment of patients with AP according to recommended guidelines, the Methodist Acute Pancreatitis Protocol (MAPP), which were implemented in January 2015.
The researchers are trying to find a way to slow down the progression of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and investigate the possibility of the long term treatment of this disease.
Cardiovascular system involvement with acute pancreatitis has been described before in the form of ECG changes and echocardiographic findings. However the correlation between these changes and the outcome of acute pancreatitis has not been and whether they can be used to predict mortality in these patients has been controversial.In the current study our aim is to detect echocardioghraphic and ECG changes in acute pancreatitis and investigate the significance of these changes on prognosis.
This is a phase I/II clinical trial assessing the tolerability and efficacy of CM4620 in children and young adults with acute pancreatitis caused by asparaginase. The tolerability of CM4620 when given to patients receiving frontline chemotherapy will be determined. The effectiveness in reducing the severity of pancreatitis will be estimated. Primary Objectives To assess the safety of CM4620 administration in children and young adults with asparaginase associated pancreatitis (AAP). To profile dose-limiting toxicities and responses of the patients treated in the dose-finding phase. To estimate the efficacy of CM4620 to prevent pseudocyst or necrotizing pancreatitis in children with AAP. Secondary Objectives To determine the effect of CM4620 on the incidence of severe pancreatitis To determine the effect of CM4620 on the incidence of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS).
This study consists of two phases (Phase I and Phase IIa). Phase IIa will be conducted sequentially after the safety of SCM-AGH is secured in Phase I. - Phase I: Multicenter in Korea, Non-Randomized, Open-label, Single Arm, 3+3 design) for Severe Acute Pancreatitis - Phase II: Multicenter in Korea, Randomized, Double-blind, 2-arm, Placebo-controlled, Parallel arm for Moderate to Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness, of three hospitalized patient care strategies in relation to disease-related malnutrition (DRM) hospital admissions based on results such as length of stay of the index admission, and from admission until one year after admission, mortality rate, appearance of complications, changes in weight and nutritional state, changes in their health related quality of life and functional status, readmissions, use of health services resources (primary care, hospital and emergency consultations) and costs. Methodology: Intervention study involving three hospitals with three branches in which, after nutritional screening in all centers, the first branch / hospital includes a intervention strategy for nutritional improvement in patients who after screening are identified as having DRE or at risk of DRE, and follow-up of other patients; a second cohort / hospital will include similar patients in which if there is any nutritional intervention it will be carried out by demand of the medical staff in charge of the patient; and a third branch /hospital in which the usual practice of the center will be followed without any explicit intervention. Subjects of the study: At least 300 patients in each center admitted to the digestive services, due to digestive pathologies, and surgery services due to tumor and digestive system pathologies. In all patients, sociodemographic and clinical data will be collected and of the outcomes described above during admission and until the year of follow-up. Statistical analysis: through appropriate multiple regression models for each outcome variable and with adjustments through propensity scores to compare the three centers based on each outcome parameter. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be carried out through of the incremental cost for each year of quality-adjusted life (QALY) .
Background The aim of the study is to compare the onset of oral feeding in the first 24 hours after hospital admission and determine if this influences the recurrence of pain or alters the blood levels of pancreatic enzymes, compared to usual oral refeeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis Methods This Non-Inferiority Randomized controlled trial was carried out between September 2018 and June 2019, prior authorization from the ethics committee in health research. Patients with diagnosis of mild acute biliary pancreatitis, were divided into: Group A (early oral refeeding) and Group B (usual oral refeeding). Outcome measures were lipase pancreatic, systemic inflammatory response (concentrations of leukocytes) were used as marker for it, feasibility evaluated by abdominal pain recurrence, presence and recurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms and length of hospital stay. The aim of the present study is to compare the onset of oral feeding in the first 24 hours after hospital admission and determine if this influences the recurrence of pain or alters the blood levels of pancreatic enzymes, compared to usual oral refeeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis.
Pancreatic duct stones can cause obstruction of the main pancreatic duct leading to abdominal pain, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and recurrent acute pancreatitis. By removing pancreatic duct stones, the obstruction can be relieved, and this can improve symptoms. Small stones can be removed with standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stone removal, but larger stones may require lithotripsy to break up the stone before removal. The two current methods of lithotripsy include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and single operator pancreatoscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy (SOPIL). ESWL is based on concentrating shock wave energy to the stone through an external device. SOPIL is a newer technique based on direct visualization of the stone during ERCP and targeting the stone with a shock wave catheter. There are currently no studies directly comparing ESWL to SOPIL for breaking apart stones in the pancreatic duct, so this study is designed to compare the two techniques. Objective #1: Obtain pilot data to determine the optimal method of clearing large MPDS Objective #2: Obtain pilot data to assess how effective large MPDS clearance is in improving long term patient centered outcomes Objective #3: Obtain pilot data to measure the cost effectiveness of large MPDS clearance
Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is estimated to be 10% to 15% in high-risk patients. Current guidelines recommend using pancreatic duct stent (PDS) for PEP prevention in high-risk patients, but it is not clear whether stent length will affect the effect of PEP prevention. The longer PDS will remain in the pancreatic duct for a longer period of time, thereby ensuring prolonged decompression with subsequent lowering of the risk for PEP. Findings from two retrospective studies showed that longer PDS was more effective in reducing the risk of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia and the frequency of PEP compared with the shorter PDS. We conducted this trial to test whether 7cm PDS was superior to 5cm PDS in PEP prevention in high-risk patients.
Investigation of the efficacy and safety of digital catheter-based pancreatoscopy (DCP) for the Treatment of symptomatic Stones of the pancreatic duct in selected patients with chronic calcifying pancreatitis (CCP)