Pancreatic Solid Lesions Clinical Trial
Official title:
Artificial Intelligence for Rapid On-site Evaluation (AI-ROSE) for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Biopsy of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Prospective Double Blinded Study
Purpose The primary objective of the study is to compare interpretation of EUS FNA/FNB samples for adequacy between ROSE and AI at bedside. To compare accuracy of preliminary diagnosis results between ROSE and AI at bedside versus final pathology report. Research design This is a prospective single center study to compare performance characteristics in the interpretation of EUS FNA/FNB samples between AI and ROSE. Procedures to be used Eligible patients will undergo EUS guided FNA/FNA of PSLs using standard of care. Sample slides are prepared by a cytopathologist at bedside and observed under a microscope. At the same time, the slides are scanned using a slide scanner and those images are saved for interpretation by AI at a later time.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | January 30, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | July 31, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 100 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Have EUS finding of a PSL; - Do not have contraindications for FNA/FNB. Exclusion Criteria: - Inability to provide informed consent for the procedure; - Contraindication for FNA/FNB eg coagulopathy, lack of avascular window for FNA. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Memorial Hermann Hospital | Houston | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Detection the adequacy for diagnosis | The primary outcome of the study is to determine how AI compares with ROSE in determining if EUS FNA/FNB sample from PSLs is adequate for diagnosis. This will be interpreted as a percentage in each group. The main study parameter is on-site determination if an EUS FNA/FNB sample is adequate for interpretation and diagnosis | During procedure | |
Secondary | Comparing the accuracy between preliminary diagnosis | To compare the accuracy between AI and ROSE preliminary diagnosis versus the final pathology report.
Interpretation of preliminary results will be divided into categories of benign vs malignancy, acinar cells vs ductal cells in benign, adenocarcinoma vs neuroendocrine tumor vs other in malignancy. |
During procedure |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03849209 -
Different Suction Techniques For Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy In Pancreatic Solid Lesions
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04924751 -
Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic vs Conventional EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03821974 -
The Comparison of Wet Suction and Dry Suction Technique in EUS-FNA for the Outcomes in Pancreatic Solid Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01936467 -
Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04924725 -
Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Contrast-enhanced Harmonic and Conventional EUS-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
|
N/A |