View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Neoplasm.
Filter by:Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising new ablation technique to fight pancreatic cancer. The primary aim of the CROSSFIRE trial is to compare the efficacy (in terms of overall survival) of FOLFIRINOX and IRE (experimental arm) to the efficacy of FOLFIRINOX and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) (control arm) in patients with locally advanced, non-resectable, non-metastasized, pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Secondary outcomes are progression free survival, safety/toxicity, immunomodulation, tumor marker Cancer Antigen (CA) 19.9, quality of life (QoL), and total direct and indirect costs for each treatment arm (cost-effectiveness analysis).
The study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new designed endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) Core biopsy aspiration needle in comparison to a conventional EUS aspiration needle in GI-tumors.
Background: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) is a well established technique for tissue acquisition and diagnosis with excellent safety profile. The overall diagnostic yield of EUSFNA exceeds 80%, with higher rates in EUSFNA of lymph nodes, where rates of >90% may be expected, as compared to pancreatic masses, where lower diagnostic rates were reported. To maximize the diagnostic yield, at least 3 needle passes are required for lymph nodes and at least 4 passes for pancreatic masses. Olympus has recently made commercially available a new 22 gauge FNA needle (EZ Shot 2 with side port) with a side port at the needle tip. The theoretical basis for introduction of the side port is to increase the diagnostic yield. Preliminary unpublished retrospective data suggested the yield might be raised. However, there are no prospective multicenter randomized controlled studies to ascertain the validity of the assumption. Aim: To determine whether there is a difference in diagnostic yield between EZ-Shot 2 and EZ-Shot 2 with side port in patients with pancreatic masses for evaluation. Methods: Patients with pancreatic masses referred for EUSFNA will be recruited prospectively and randomized to either EZ-Shot 2 or EZ Shot 2 with sideport for the first puncture, and then the alternative needle will be used for repeated punctured. The cytological and diagnostic yield at first pass for both needles will be compared. Clinical significance: This will determine whether the new needle design can further improve the diagnostic yield of EUSFNA of pancreatic masses.
Title: The role of early systematic best palliative care versus on request palliative care consultation during standard oncologic treatment for patients with advanced gastric or pancreatic cancers: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Description of Study Treatment: 1. Interventional arm Patients will receive standard oncologic care and will be assigned to early systematic best palliative care. They will meet a member of the palliative care team within 2 weeks after enrolment. Thereafter, they shall be visited by a palliative care team member every 2 weeks until death. Patients assigned to this experimental arm will be evaluated if the total of palliative care visits between T0 (day of enrollment) and T1 (12±3 weeks) is ≥3. Palliative care visits and intervention has to be oriented by the General guidelines for palliative care: specific attention will be paid to assessing physical and psychosocial symptoms, establishing goals of care, assisting decision making regarding treatment, and coordinating care on the basis of the individual needs of the patients. The doctor expert in palliative care, with regular visits in the experimental arm, must be a physician dedicated full time to palliative care, that can directly prescribe drugs and other interventions, and with a particular attention to physical, psychological, and spiritual needs. Palliative care doctor must have the possibility to decide about organizational arrangements. He has to perform the palliative care visit according to Temel indications. 2. Standard arm Patients will receive standard oncologic care and will be assigned to on request palliative care consultation. They will be not scheduled to meet with the palliative care service unless a meeting will be requested by the patients, the family, or the oncologist. After the time of evaluation (T1) patients will be followed by the palliative care services as needed. Patient completes QoL (Quality of Life) and mood questionnaires at baseline and at 12 weeks ± 3. Patients will receive standard antineoplastic treatment in both arms of the study according to best clinical practice in each participating centre.
This study compares the 19G and 25G needles for procuring tissue samples from the pancreas during Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) procedures.
The purpose of this research study is for the participant to give their own T cells (a type of blood cell in the body that can fight infections and possibly cancer) to them after they have been removed, grown in a lab, and then coated with an experimental drug. This study will determine the highest dose of EGFR2Bi coated T cells that can be given without causing severe side effects. Initially a group of 3 participants will receive the same dose of study drug. If no serious side effects occur, the next group of participants will receive a slightly higher dose of study agent. The following groups of participants will receive higher doses of the study drug until a dose is reached where there are unacceptable side effects and maximum tolerated dose is found, or the planned highest dose level is reached with no side effects.
The aim of this research study is to identify the best needle for performing biopsy during EUS procedures. There are two types of needles for performing biopsy: A FNA needle that provides a small sample of tissue for analysis and a 22G ProCore needle that provides larger amount of tissue. It is not clear at this point which of the two needles is superior for performing biopsy. This study will attempt to identify the better needle by assessing the performance of both needles in a randomized fashion.
EUS-guided FNA has been proved to be a safe and useful method for tissue sampling of gastrointestinal track lesions and other organ lesions including mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymph nodes, pancreas and hepatobiliary tree. The usefulness of EUS-FNA depends on several factors. For example, experience of the endosonographers, adequate sampling, sample preparing, accurate interpretation by the cytopathologist and on-site cytopathology interpretation. However, in many hospitals, no cytopathologist can be present during EUS-FNA. Therefore, determining appropriate methods to obtain and prepare EUS-guided FNA are important to make correct a diagnosis without on-site cytopathologist. Suction with a self-retracting 10-mL syringe will likely bring in more cellularity but also more blood. Some endosonographers use no suction, others use constant suction. Usually specimen is expelled from a needle with pushing the stylet into the needle. But use of the stylet during EUS-FNA is difficult and time consuming process. Injecting air was not recommended, because of spraying out uncontrollably, increasing risk of air artifact and specimen clotting. However, there is no further study which one is the appropriate, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air until now. The hypothesis and aim of the prospective randomized controlled trials are as follows: First hypothesis: There was no difference in the adequacy, cellularity, bloodiness, contamination, air artifact in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air. Aim #1 : To compare the adequacy, cellularity, bloodiness, contamination, air artifact in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air. Second hypothesis: There was no difference in sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and statistical agreement in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air. Aim #2 : To compare the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and statistical agreement in specimen obtained by each methods, suction or no suction and pushing the stylet or injecting air.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) still carries a high rate of severe postoperative complications. No score is currently available to help identify the patient's surgical risk. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic score to predict major postoperative complications after PD.
This study will assess the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide long-acting release in patients who have rare tumors of neuroendocrine origin.