Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04754737 |
Other study ID # |
IRB20-101 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 23, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2024 |
Source |
Benaroya Research Institute |
Contact |
Justina Tam, MD |
Phone |
6314441910 |
Email |
justina.tam[@]stonybrookmedicine.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA, which is performed through a cystoscopic
procedure, has been demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of both neurogenic and
non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB), and is FDA approved as a treatment for overactive
bladder. Intradetrusor of onabotulinumtoxinA is currently standard of care of patients with
OAB who have persistent OAB symptoms despite behavioral therapies and oral medication
treatments for OAB. As one of the main adverse events associated with intradetrusor injection
of onabotulinumtoxinA is UTI, and published guidelines for cystoscopic procedures with
manipulation recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics, a single dose of prophylactic
antibiotic is administered prior to this procedure. However, these recommendations are
primarily based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving antimicrobial
prophylaxis during transurethral resection of the prostate. A previously published
prospective study demonstrated that the rate of post-procedural UTI did not differ amongst
patients with neurogenic bladder who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics and were
asymptomatic for UTI, regardless of whether they had sterile urine cultures or asymptomatic
bacteriuria, suggesting that patients who are not symptomatic for UTI may not require
antibiotic prophylaxis prior to intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Studies have
reported that up to 50% of antibiotic usage is inappropriate, leading to unnecessary exposure
of patients to potential complications of antibiotic therapy, including Clostridium difficile
infection which can cause recurrent diarrhea that may progress to sepsis and death,
increasing antibiotic resistances, as well as dermal/allergic and gastro-intestinal
manifestations. Therefore, in an effort to optimize antibiotic use, the investigators propose
a prospective, randomized study to formally evaluate the differences in UTI frequency in
subjects who have a negative urinalysis and are not symptomatic for UTI and receive
prophylactic antibiotics at the time of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection compared
to those who do not receive prophylactic antibiotics at the time of injection. The proposed
study seeks to evaluate the current practice standard of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to
intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin injection.
Description:
Intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA, which is performed thorough a cystoscopic
procedure, has been demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of both neurogenic and
non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB), and is FDA approved as a treatment for OAB.
Intradetrusor of onabotulinumtoxinA is currently standard of care in patients with persistent
OAB symptoms despite behavioral therapies and oral medication treatments for OAB. As one of
the main adverse events associated with intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA is UTI,
and published guidelines for cystoscopic procedures with manipulation recommend the use of
prophylactic antibiotics, a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic is administered prior to
this procedure as the current standard of care. However, the guideline recommendations are
primarily based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving antimicrobial
prophylaxis during transurethral resection of the prostate, and does not address cystoscopic
injection procedures like onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Studies have reported that up to 50%
of antibiotic usage is inappropriate, leading to unnecessary exposure of patients to
potential complications of antibiotic therapy, including Clostridium difficile infection
which can cause recurrent diarrhea that may progress to sepsis and death, increasing
antibiotic resistances, as well as dermal/allergic and gastro-intestinal manifestations. In
an effort to optimize antibiotic usage, antimicrobial stewardship is required in nursing
facilities, acute-care and critical care hospitals, as well as ambulatory care centers. These
efforts highlight the importance of re-evaluating our current practice standard of
prophylactic antibiotic administration in urologic procedures. A prospective study that
included patients undergoing intradetrusor onabutulinumtoxin injections who were not
symptomatic for UTI and did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis demonstrated that the rate of
post-procedure UTI within 6 weeks of treatment was not significantly different in those with
a sterile urine culture compared to those with asymptomatic bacteriuria, suggesting that in
patients who are not symptomatic for UTI, antibiotic prophylaxis may not be necessary prior
to intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin injection. To date, there have been no randomized studies
that evaluate differences in outcomes when prophylactic antibiotics are not given prior to
onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Therefore, in an effort to optimize antibiotic use, the
investigators propose a prospective, randomized study to formally investigate whether there
is a difference in the rate of symptomatic post-procedure UTI after intradetrusor
onabotulinumtoxin when antibiotic prophylaxis is given compared to when antibiotic
prophylaxis is not given in patients who are not symptomatic for UTI and have a negative
urinalysis. The proposed study seeks to evaluate the current practice standard of antibiotic
prophylaxis prior to intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin injection.