Overactive Bladder Clinical Trial
— EmpowurOfficial title:
An International Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active (Tolterodine)-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vibegron in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
Verified date | February 2021 |
Source | Urovant Sciences GmbH |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of vibegron administered once daily in patients with OAB.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1530 |
Est. completion date | February 4, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | January 10, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Has a history of OAB for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit. 2. Meets either the OAB Wet or OAB Dry criteria. Exclusion Criteria: Urology Medical History 1. Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL in the past 6 months or during the 14-day Run-in Period. 2. Has lower urinary tract pathology that could, in the opinion of the Investigator, be responsible for urgency, frequency, or incontinence. 3. Has a history of surgery to correct stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or procedural treatments for BPH within 6 months of Screening. 4. Has current history or evidence of Stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse (prolapse extends beyond the hymenal ring). 5. Patient is currently using a pessary for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. 6. Has a known history of elevated post-void residual volume defined as greater than 150 mL. 7. Has undergone bladder training or electrostimulation within 28 days prior to Screening or plans to initiate either during the study. 8. Has an active or recurrent (> 3 episodes per year) urinary tract infection by clinical symptoms or pre-defined laboratory criteria. 9. Has a requirement for an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization. 10. Has received an intradetrusor injection of botulinum toxin within 9 months prior to Screening. 11. Has uncontrolled hyperglycemia (defined as fasting blood glucose > 150 mg/dL or 8.33 mmol/L and/or non-fasting blood glucose > 200 mg/dL or 11.1 mmol/L) or, if in the opinion of the Investigator, is uncontrolled. 12. Has evidence of diabetes insipidus. 13. Is pregnant, breast-feeding, or is planning to conceive within the projected duration of the study. 14. Has a concurrent malignancy or history of any malignancy within 5 years prior to signing informed consent, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer. 15. Has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure of = 180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of = 100 mmHg) or has a resting heart rate (by pulse) > 100 beats per minute. 16. Has narrow angle glaucoma (primary open angle glaucoma is not excluded). 17. Has a history of cerebral vascular accident, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, coronary artery interventions (e.g., coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary interventions [e.g., angioplasty, stent insertion]), or neurovascular interventions (e.g., carotid artery stenting) within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit. Has a known history of liver disease. 18. Has a history of injury, surgery, or neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's) that could affect the lower urinary tract or its nerve supply. 19. Has hematuria, including microscopic hematuria according to pre-defined criteria. 20. Has clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality. 21. Has alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase > 2.0 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or bilirubin (total bilirubin) > 1.5 x ULN (or > 2.0 x ULN if secondary to Gilbert syndrome or pattern consistent with Gilbert syndrome). 22. Has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. 23. Has an allergy, intolerance, or a history of a significant clinical or laboratory adverse experience associated with any of the active or inactive components of the vibegron formulation or tolterodine formulation. 24. Is currently participating or has participated in a study with an investigational compound or device within 28 days prior to signing informed consent, or has participated in any previous study with vibegron. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Manna Research (Quebec) | Levis | Quebec |
Canada | Recherche GCP Research | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Manna Research (Montreal) | Montréal | Quebec |
Canada | Central Alberta Research Clinic | Red Deer | Alberta |
Canada | Diex Research Sherbrooke Inc. | Sherbrooke | Quebec |
Canada | PrimeHealth Clinical Research | Toronto | Ontario |
Canada | Silverado Research Inc. | Victoria | British Columbia |
Hungary | Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft. | Budapest | |
Hungary | Szarka Ödön Egyesitett Egeszsegügyi es Szocialis Intezmeny | Csongrád | |
Hungary | Szent Anna Private Surgery | Debrecen | |
Hungary | Mediroyal Prevention Center | Kecskemét | |
Hungary | Uro-clin Ltd | Pécs | |
Latvia | Daugavpils Regional Hospital | Daugavpils | |
Latvia | Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital | Riga | |
Latvia | Uro Ltd. | Riga | |
Lithuania | Public Institution Republican Klaipda Hospital | Klaipeda | |
Lithuania | Vilnius | Vilnius | |
Lithuania | Vilnius city Clinical hospital | Vilnius | |
Poland | Klimed Marek Klimkiewicz | Bialystok | Woj. Podlaskie |
Poland | ETG Lodz | Lódz | Woj. Lodzkie |
Poland | NZOZ NOVITA Specjalistyczne Gabinety Lekarskie | Lublin | Woj. Lubelskie |
Poland | NZOZ Centrum Urologiczne sp. z o.o. | Myslowice | Woj. Slaskie |
Poland | Nzoz Heureka | Piaseczno | Woj. Mazowieckie |
Poland | Poradnia Urologiczna EuroMediCare Szpital Specjalistyczny z Przychodnia | Wroclaw | Woj. Dolnoslaskie |
United States | AccumetRx Clinical Research - Division of Urology Group of New Mexico | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc. | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Dream Team Clinical Research LLC | Anaheim | California |
United States | Millennium Clinical Trials | Arlington | Virginia |
United States | Innovative Medical Research of South Florida Inc. | Aventura | Florida |
United States | Pioneer Clinical Research, LLC | Bellevue | Nebraska |
United States | Hassman Research Institute | Berlin | New Jersey |
United States | Montana Health Research Institute Inc. | Billings | Montana |
United States | United Medical Associates | Binghamton | New York |
United States | Achieve Clinical Research | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Central Alabama Research | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Elite Clinical Trials | Blackfoot | Idaho |
United States | Boston Clinical Trials | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Progressive Clinical Research | Bountiful | Utah |
United States | PAB Clinical Research | Brandon | Florida |
United States | PMG Research of Bristol LLC | Bristol | Tennessee |
United States | Investigators Research Group LLC | Brownsburg | Indiana |
United States | DiscoveResearch Inc. | Bryan | Texas |
United States | Seattle Urology Research | Burien | Washington |
United States | Hope Clinical Research | Canoga Park | California |
United States | PMG Research of Cary | Cary | North Carolina |
United States | Core Healthcare Group | Cerritos | California |
United States | Clinical Trials of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Pharmacorp Clinical Trials Inc. | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | PMG Research of Charlotte LLC | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | WR - ClinSearch LLC | Chattanooga | Tennessee |
United States | Sentral Clinical Research Services | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Innovative Research of West FL Inc. | Clearwater | Florida |
United States | Rapid Medical Research | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Aventiv Research, Inc. | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Buckeye Health and Research | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Universal Medical and Research Center LLC | Coral Gables | Florida |
United States | Top Medical Research Inc. | Cutler Bay | Florida |
United States | Providence Health Partners | Dayton | Ohio |
United States | Avail Clinical Research | DeLand | Florida |
United States | Jesscan Medical Research | Delray Beach | Florida |
United States | Horizons Clinical Research Center | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Lynn Institute of Denver | Denver | Colorado |
United States | WR Global Medical Research | DeSoto | Texas |
United States | Revival Research | Doral | Florida |
United States | Greater Providence Clinical Research, LLC | East Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Riverside Clinical Research | Edgewater | Florida |
United States | Premier Urology Group LLC | Edison | New Jersey |
United States | Regional Clinical Research Inc. | Endwell | New York |
United States | HWC Womens Research Center | Englewood | Ohio |
United States | Urologic Research and Consulting LLC | Englewood | New Jersey |
United States | Evanston Premier Healthcare Research | Evanston | Illinois |
United States | MediSphere Medical Research Center | Evansville | Indiana |
United States | KO Clinical Research | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | Piedmont Research Partners | Fort Mill | South Carolina |
United States | Research Center of Fresno Inc. | Fresno | California |
United States | AccuMed Research Associates | Garden City | New York |
United States | PharmQuest | Greensboro | North Carolina |
United States | DeGarmo Institute of Medical Research | Greer | South Carolina |
United States | Fundamental Research LLC | Gulf Shores | Alabama |
United States | Clinical Investigation Specialists Inc. | Gurnee | Illinois |
United States | Chesapeake Urology Research Associates | Hanover | Maryland |
United States | Drug Trials America | Hartsdale | New York |
United States | American Clinical Trials | Hawaiian Gardens | California |
United States | A.G.A Clinical Trials | Hialeah | Florida |
United States | Best Quality Research, Inc. | Hialeah | Florida |
United States | Indago Research Health Center | Hialeah | Florida |
United States | Vital Pharm Research Inc. | Hialeah | Florida |
United States | Peters Medical Research | High Point | North Carolina |
United States | Advances in Health | Houston | Texas |
United States | BI Research Center | Houston | Texas |
United States | Centex Studies Inc. | Houston | Texas |
United States | Discovery MM Services Inc. | Houston | Texas |
United States | Pioneer Research Solutions | Houston | Texas |
United States | Marvel Clinical Research | Huntington Beach | California |
United States | Longwood Research | Huntsville | Alabama |
United States | Protenium Clinical Research | Hurst | Texas |
United States | Leonard Maliver MD Antria, Inc. | Indiana | Pennsylvania |
United States | The Jackson Clinic | Jackson | Tennessee |
United States | Smart Medical Research Inc. | Jackson Heights | New York |
United States | The Clinical Trial Center LLC | Jenkintown | Pennsylvania |
United States | MultiSpecialty Clinical Research, Inc. | Johnson City | Tennessee |
United States | Health Awareness, Inc. | Jupiter | Florida |
United States | Discovery MM Services Inc. | Katy | Texas |
United States | Volunteer Research Group - NOCCR | Knoxville | Tennessee |
United States | Grossmont Center for Clinical Research | La Mesa | California |
United States | Barrett Clinic P.C. | La Vista | Nebraska |
United States | Prime-Care Clinical Research | Laguna Hills | California |
United States | Centex Studies Inc. | Lake Charles | Louisiana |
United States | Green and Seidner Family Practice Associates P.C. | Lansdale | Pennsylvania |
United States | Clinical Research Consortium | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Excel Clinical Research | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Sheldon Freedman MD Ltd | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Lawrence OB-GYN Clinical Research LLC | Lawrenceville | New Jersey |
United States | Central Kentucky Research Associates Inc. | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC | Lincoln | Nebraska |
United States | Long Beach Clinical Trial Services Inc. | Long Beach | California |
United States | Long Beach Clinical Trials LLC | Long Beach | California |
United States | Downtown L.A. Research Center Inc. | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Urology Group of Southern California | Los Angeles | California |
United States | L-MARC Research Center | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Adams Patterson Gynecology and Obstetrics | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Advanced Clinical Research | Meridian | Idaho |
United States | Advanced Medical Research Institute | Miami | Florida |
United States | AppleMed Research Group LLC | Miami | Florida |
United States | LCC Medical Research Institute Inc. | Miami | Florida |
United States | Miami Clinical Research | Miami | Florida |
United States | Nuren Medical Research Center | Miami | Florida |
United States | San Marcus Research Clinic Inc. | Miami | Florida |
United States | Clinical Research Solutions | Middleburg Heights | Ohio |
United States | Clinical Research Consulting LLC | Milford | Connecticut |
United States | Montana Medical Research | Missoula | Montana |
United States | Discovery MM Services Inc. | Missouri City | Texas |
United States | Coastal Clinical Research Inc. | Mobile | Alabama |
United States | PMG Research of Charleston LLC | Moncks Corner | South Carolina |
United States | Coastal Carolina Research Center | Mount Pleasant | South Carolina |
United States | PMG Research of Charleston LLC | Mount Pleasant | South Carolina |
United States | Tri Valley Urology Medical Group | Murrieta | California |
United States | Family Medicine of SayeBrook LLC | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina |
United States | Clinical Research Associates Inc. | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | BTC of New Bedford | New Bedford | Massachusetts |
United States | Coastal Connecticut Research LLC | New London | Connecticut |
United States | DelRicht Research | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | Bayside Clinical Research | New Port Richey | Florida |
United States | Suncoast Clinical Research Inc. | New Port Richey | Florida |
United States | Health Research of Hampton Roads Inc. | Newport News | Virginia |
United States | Meridian Clinical Research LLC | Norfolk | Nebraska |
United States | Regeneris Medical | North Attleboro | Massachusetts |
United States | Infinity Medical Research Inc. | North Dartmouth | Massachusetts |
United States | Lynn Health Science Institute | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Adult and Pediatric Urology P.C. | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | Quality Clinical Research Inc. | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | Compass Research LLC | Orlando | Florida |
United States | In-Quest Medical Research, LLC | Peachtree Corners | Georgia |
United States | Palmetto Institute of Clinical Research Inc. | Pelzer | South Carolina |
United States | South Broward Research LLC | Pembroke Pines | Florida |
United States | Clinical Research of Philadelphia LLC | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Preferred Primary Care Physicians Inc. | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Preferred Primary Care Physicians Inc. | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Research Protocol Management Specialists Hills ObGyn Associates Inc | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Village Health Partners ACRC Trials | Plano | Texas |
United States | Clinical Research Center of Florida | Pompano Beach | Florida |
United States | Poplar Bluff Urology | Poplar Bluff | Missouri |
United States | ProHealth Care AssociatesLLP | Port Jefferson | New York |
United States | Beacon Clinical Research | Quincy | Massachusetts |
United States | Associated Urologists of North Carolina | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Raleigh Medical Group PMG Research of Raleigh | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Remidica LLC | Rochester | Michigan |
United States | Rochester Clinical Research Inc. | Rochester | New York |
United States | Northern California Research | Sacramento | California |
United States | Saginaw Valley Medical Research | Saginaw | Michigan |
United States | Pinellas Urology | Saint Petersburg | Florida |
United States | PMG Research of Salisbury | Salisbury | North Carolina |
United States | Wasatch Clinical Research LLC | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Bandera Family Health Care | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Clinical Trials of Texas Inc. | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | San Bernadino Urological Associates | San Bernardino | California |
United States | Artemis Institute for Clinical Research | San Diego | California |
United States | WR MCCCR | San Diego | California |
United States | Artemis Institute for Clinical Research | San Marcos | California |
United States | CentraCare Clinic Adult & Pediatric Urology | Sartell | Minnesota |
United States | Meridian Clinical Research LLC | Savannah | Georgia |
United States | Seattle Women's: Health, Research, Gynecology | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Regional Urology LLC | Shreveport | Louisiana |
United States | Hillcrest Clinical Research LLC | Simpsonville | South Carolina |
United States | Frontier Clinical Research, LLC | Smithfield | Pennsylvania |
United States | North Spokane Womens Health | Spokane | Washington |
United States | Clinova Clinical Trials | Spring | Texas |
United States | Meridien Research | Spring Hill | Florida |
United States | Clinical Research Atlanta | Stockbridge | Georgia |
United States | Palmetto Clinical Research | Summerville | South Carolina |
United States | Clinical Research of West Florida | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Clinical Research Consortium | Tempe | Arizona |
United States | Bioclinica Research | The Villages | Florida |
United States | Eclipse Clinical Research | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Noble Clinical Research | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Preferred Primary Care Physicians Inc. | Uniontown | Pennsylvania |
United States | Empire Clinical Research | Upland | California |
United States | PEAK Research LLC | Upper Saint Clair | Pennsylvania |
United States | Bayview Research Group LLC | Valley Village | California |
United States | Family Practice Center of Wadsworth Inc. - New Venture Medical Research | Wadsworth | Ohio |
United States | Omega Medical Research | Warwick | Rhode Island |
United States | Chase Medical Research, LLC | Waterbury | Connecticut |
United States | Bay State Clinical Trials Inc. | Watertown | Massachusetts |
United States | Asclepes Research Centers | Weeki Wachee | Florida |
United States | Advanced Clinical Research | West Jordan | Utah |
United States | Heartland Research Associates LLC | Wichita | Kansas |
United States | Heartland Research Associates LLC | Wichita | Kansas |
United States | Upstate Clinical Research Associates LLC | Williamsville | New York |
United States | Ohio Clinical Research LLC | Willoughby Hills | Ohio |
United States | PMG Research | Wilmington | North Carolina |
United States | PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC | Wilmington | North Carolina |
United States | Carolina Medical Trials LLC | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
United States | PMG Research of Winston-Salem | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
United States | Clinical Research of Central Florida | Winter Haven | Florida |
United States | North Georgia Clinical Research | Woodstock | Georgia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Urovant Sciences GmbH |
United States, Canada, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline (CFB) at Week 12 in the Average Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours in All Overactive Bladder (OAB) Participants | A micturition/void is defined as "Urinated in Toilet" as indicated on the Patient Voiding Diary (PVD). The number of micturitions is defined as the number of times a participant voided in the toilet as indicated on the PVD. The average daily number of micturitions was calculated using the daily entries in the PVD (which was to be completed prior to each study visit) as the total number of micturitions that occurred on a Complete Diary Day (CDD) divided by the number of CDDs in the PVD. CFB was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when the participant got up for the day each morning and time the participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures are study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), OAB type (wet/dry), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL number of micturitions, and treatment by study visit interaction. FAS=Full Analysis Set. | Baseline (BL); Week 12 | |
Primary | CFB at Week 12 in the Average Number of Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours in OAB Wet Participants | The number of UUI episodes is defined as the number of times a participant had checked "urge" as the main reason for the leakage in the PVD, regardless of whether more than one reason for leakage in addition to "urge" was checked. The average daily number of UUI episodes was calculated using the daily entries in the PVD (which was to be completed prior to each study visit) as the total number of UUI episodes that occurred on a CDD divided by the number of CCDs in the PVD. CFB was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when participant got up for the day each morning and time participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL number of UUI episodes and treatment by study visit interaction. FAS-I=Full Analysis Set for Incontinence. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in the Average Number of Urgency Episodes Over 24 Hours in All OAB Participants | An urgency episode is defined as the "Need to Urinate Immediately" as indicated on the PVD. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Over 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when the participant got up for the day each morning and time the participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), OAB type (wet/dry), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL number of urgency episodes, and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of OAB Wet Participants With at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | The number of UUI episodes is defined as the number of times a participant had checked "urge" as the main reason for the leakage in the PVD, regardless of whether more than one reason for leakage in addition to "urge" was checked. The average daily number of UUI episodes was calculated using the daily entries in the PVD (which was to be completed prior to each study visit) as the total number of UUI episodes that occurred on a CDD divided by the number of CCDs in the PVD. CFB was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when participant got up for the day each morning and time participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of OAB Wet Participants With a 100% Reduction From Baseline in UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | The number of UUI episodes is defined as the number of times a participant had checked "urge" as the main reason for the leakage in the PVD, regardless of whether more than one reason for leakage in addition to "urge" was checked. The average daily number of UUI episodes was calculated using the daily entries in the PVD (which was to be completed prior to each study visit) as the total number of UUI episodes that occurred on a CDD divided by the number of CCDs in the PVD. CFB was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when participant got up for the day each morning and time participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of All OAB Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | An urgency episode is defined as the "Need to Urinate Immediately" as indicated on the PVD. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when the participant got up for the day each morning and time the participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in the Average Number of Total Incontinence Episodes Over 24 Hours in OAB Wet Participants | Total incontinence is defined as having any reason for "Accidental Urine Leakage" and/or "Accidental Urine Leakage" checked, as indicated on the PVD. It is assumed that if the participant recorded a reason for leakage then the accidental urine leakage occurred. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. "Over 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when the par. got up for the day each morning and time the par. got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL number of incontinence episodes, and treatment by study visit interaction. hr = hours. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in the Coping Score From the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Long Form (OAB-q LF, 1-week Recall) in All OAB Participants | The OAB-q LF is a validated patient-reported outcome. 8 questions of the OAB-q LF ask participants how well they have coped with their bladder symptoms during the previous week, as a measure of quality of life. Each question has a response ranging from "not coping" (= 1) to "coping well" (= 6). These questions make up the coping scale. The raw score (sum of question scores [ranging from 8 to 48]) is transformed to a unified score, ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to a higher quality of life, and lower scores represent a lower quality of life. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), OAB type (wet/dry), BL score, and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in the Average Volume Voided Per Micturition in All OAB Participants | A micturition/void is defined as "Urinated in Toilet" as indicated on the PVD. The number of micturitions is defined as the number of times a participant voided in the toilet as indicated on the PVD. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), OAB type (wet/dry), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL volume (milliliters [mL]), and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score From the OAB-q LF (1-week Recall) in All OAB Participants | The OAB-q LF is a validated patient-reported outcome. The 25 questions comprising the Coping, Concern, Sleep and Social Interaction subscales of the OAB-q LF ask participants how much their symptoms have affected their life over the last week. Each question has a response ranging from "None of the time" (= 1) to "All of the time" (= 6). The raw score (sum of question scores for the 4 subscales [ranging from 25 to 150]) is transformed to a unified score, ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to a higher quality of life, and lower scores represent a lower quality of life. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), OAB type (wet/dry), BL score, and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in the Symptom Bother Score From the OAB-q LF (1-week Recall) in All OAB Participants | The OAB-q LF is a validated patient-reported outcome. The first 8 questions of the OAB-q LF ask participants how much they were bothered by their bladder symptoms during the previous week. Each question has a response ranging from "Not at all" (= 1) to "A very great deal" (= 6). These questions make up the symptom bother scale. The raw score (sum of question scores [ranging from 8 to 48]) is transformed to a unified score, ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to the symptoms having a larger bother, and lower scores represent a lower amount of bother due to symptoms. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), OAB type (wet/dry), BL score, and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of All OAB Participants With an Average Number of Micturitions < 8 Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | A micturition/void is defined as "Urinated in Toilet" as indicated on the PVD. The number of micturitions is defined as the number of times a participant voided in the toilet as indicated on the PVD. A participant was defined as having an average of < 8 daily micturitions if the arithmetic mean of the number of micturitions per day in the PVD was less than 8 . "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when the participant got up for the day each morning and time the participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD). | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of OAB Wet Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | Total incontinence is defined as having any reason for "Accidental Urine Leakage" and/or "Accidental Urine Leakage" checked, as indicated on the PVD. It is assumed that if the participant recorded a reason for leakage then the accidental urine leakage occurred. All events marked as having leakage, regardless of cause, or where "Accidental Leakage" was checked. were used in the analysis. "Per 24 hours" corresponds to one Diary Day (i.e., time between when the participant got up for the day each morning and time the participant got up for the day the next morning as recorded in the PVD. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in Overall Bladder Symptoms Based on Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-Severity) in All OAB Participants | The Patient Global Impression (PGI) questions are designed to assess a participant's overall impression of OAB. For the PGI-Severity score, participants are asked to rate their OAB symptoms over the previous week with one of the following responses: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), OAB type (wet/dry), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL score, and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 | |
Secondary | CFB at Week 12 in Overall Control Over Bladder Symptoms Based on Patient Global Impression of Control (PGI-Control) in All OAB Participants | The Patient Global Impression (PGI) questions are designed to assess a participant's overall impression of OAB. For the PGI-Control score, participants were asked to rate how much control they had over their OAB symptoms over the previous week with one of the following responses: 1 = complete control, 2 = a lot of control, 3 = some control, 4 = only a little control, 5 = no control. CFB is calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value. Covariates included in the mixed model for repeated measures were study visit (Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12), OAB type (wet/dry), sex, region (U.S./non-U.S.), BL score, and treatment by study visit interaction. | Baseline; Week 12 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04578899 -
"The Effectiveness of Transvertebral Magnetic Neuromodulation in Patients With Detrusor Overactivity"
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03556891 -
Pivotal Study of eCoin for Overactive Bladder With Urgency Urinary Incontinence
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05977634 -
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01955408 -
Severity of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients After Synergo Treatment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06201013 -
Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin D in the Treatment of OAB-wet in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03727711 -
TPTNS: Home vs Hospital Treatment for Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00768521 -
A Study to Test the Effects of Tolterodine Tartrate in Patients With Overactive Bladder (0000-107)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03625843 -
Mindfulness Exercises to Reduce Anxiety and Pain During Urodynamic Testing
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02211846 -
A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Mirabegron OCAS (Oral Controlled Absorption System) in Pediatric Subjects With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity or Overactive Bladder
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02857816 -
PRospective Study to Evaluate EffectivenesS With the NURO™ PErcutaneous Tibial Neuromodulation System in Patients With OAB
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02835846 -
Investigation of the Effect of the Female Urinary Microbiome on Incontinence
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02320201 -
Foot Neuromodulation for Overactive Bladder in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02202031 -
Controlling Urgency Through Relaxation Exercises
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01409512 -
Evaluation of Autonomic System Before and After Anticholinergic Treatment in Women With Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01423838 -
Comparison of Solifenacin and Oxybutynin in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01437670 -
Observational Study to Estimate the Dry Mouth in OAB Patients With Solifenacin
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01458197 -
A Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Tarafenacin 0.2 mg and Tarafenacin 0.4 mg to Placebo in Patients Suffering From Overactive Bladder.
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01758848 -
Physical Therapy for Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01210859 -
Effects of Antimuscarinic Drugs on Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms After Insertion of Ureteral Stents
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01122563 -
A Study to Evaluate Response of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) to Treatment
|
N/A |