Overactive Bladder Clinical Trial
Official title:
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Vulnerable Elderly Patients With Overactive Bladder.
Verified date | December 2012 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a flexible dose regimen of fesoterodine on urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes in vulnerable elderly subjects with overactive bladder (OAB).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 566 |
Est. completion date | September 2011 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2011 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 65 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - male or female subjects 65 years of age or older - OAB symptoms for at least 3 months - score 3 or greater on Vulnerable Elderly Survey (VES-13) - adequate mobility for independent toileting - mean number of at least 2 UUI episodes per 24 hours - mean urinary frequency of 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours - able to independently complete the bladder diaries Exclusion Criteria: - PVR urinary volume greater than 200 ml - MMSE score less than 20 - greater than 15 UUI episodes per 24 hours - creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min - an average resting heart rate of greater than or equal to 90 beats per minute |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Albany | New York |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Altoona | Pennsylvania |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Arkansas City | Kansas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Bethany | Oklahoma |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Bonita Springs | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Boynton Beach | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Bristol | Tennessee |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Brooklyn | New York |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Brooksville | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Burien | Washington |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Cary | North Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Cary | North Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Chattanooga | Tennessee |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Clearwater | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Columbia | South Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Corpus Christi | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Costa Mesa | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Daytona Beach | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | DeLand | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | East Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | East Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Edina | Minnesota |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Englewood | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Englewood | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Erie | Pennsylvania |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Fairfield | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Ft. Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Glen Burnie | Maryland |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Glendora | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Grand Rapids | Michigan |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Green Valley | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Groton | Connecticut |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Jackson | Tennessee |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Kalamazoo | Michigan |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Kansas City | Kansas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | La Mesa | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Lake Worth | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Leander | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Lincoln | Nebraska |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Little Rock | Arkansas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Little Rock | Arkansas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Long Beach | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Longmont | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Longview | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Longview | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Macon | Georgia |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Melbourne | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Mesa | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Milford | Connecticut |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Mission Viejo | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Montgomery | Alabama |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Moorestown | New Jersey |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Murray | Utah |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Murrieta | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Naples | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | New London | Connecticut |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | New Port Richey | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | New Port Richey | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Newburgh | Indiana |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Norman | Oklahoma |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Norwalk | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Ocala | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Paramount | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Parker | Colorado |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Picayune | Mississippi |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Plant City | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Rancho Santa Margarita | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Bernardino | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | San Diego | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Santa Ana | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Sarasota | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Sewell | New Jersey |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Shreveport | Louisiana |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Southaven | Mississippi |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Spokane | Washington |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Springfield | Massachusetts |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Springfield | Illinois |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Springfield | Illinois |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | St. Louis | Missouri |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | St. Petersburg | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Staten Island | New York |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Temecula | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Temple | Texas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Towson | Maryland |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Trinity | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Tuscon | Arizona |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Vacaville | California |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Wellington | Florida |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | West Jordan | Utah |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Wichita | Kansas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Wichita | Kansas |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Williamsville | New York |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Willoughby Hills | Ohio |
United States | Pfizer Investigational Site | Winter Haven | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours | UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline | No |
Primary | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 | UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline, Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 | UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline, Week 4 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Percent change of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours | Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Percent change of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours | Nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes had USS rating of 3 or more that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. | Baseline | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes had USS rating of 3 or more that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Percent change of nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours | Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. | Baseline | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12 | Protective Undergarments included pads, protective padding, protective underwear (pull up), and briefs (diaper). The mean number of undergarments changed per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of undergarments changed divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change from baseline values were reported at week 4 for subsets of population with baseline values less than or equal to (=<) 3.5 and more than (>) 3.5 undergarments/day and at Week 12 for subsets of population with baseline values =< 2.5 and > 2.5 undergarments/day. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12 | PPBC: a self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asks participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. The PPBC assessment is rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Deterioration=score difference is greater than 0; no change=score difference is 0; minor improvement=score difference is -1; major difference=score difference is less than or equal to -2. | Screening, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score | OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. | Baseline | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12 | OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) | OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = [(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range]*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL. | Baseline | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12 | OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function. HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = [(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range]*100. Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | No |
Secondary | Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control | OAB-S: a validated self-administered instrument that evaluates OAB medication expectations, daily life with AB, and satisfaction with OAB medication and includes 3 stand-alone items that assess overall expectation, satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment. Satisfaction coded on scale of 1 to 5: (1=very satisfied to 5=very dissatisfied). Coding reversed algorithmically and results transformed: total score range 0 to100. Higher final response value associated with better satisfaction. | Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response | Participant's response to question, "overall, how satisfied are you with your OAB medication?" was obtained on a 5 point scale, 1- very satisfied, 2- somewhat satisfied, 3- neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4- somewhat dissatisfied and 5- very dissatisfied. Response values 1 and 2 were combined into "satisfied", and 4 and 5 were combined into "dissatisfied". | Week 12 | No |
Secondary | Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) | MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. | Screening | Yes |
Secondary | Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12 | MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week X minus mean score at baseline | Screening, Week 12 | Yes |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12 | PVR volume is defined as volume of urine remaining in the bladder immediately after urination. | Baseline, Week 4, 12 | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04578899 -
"The Effectiveness of Transvertebral Magnetic Neuromodulation in Patients With Detrusor Overactivity"
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03556891 -
Pivotal Study of eCoin for Overactive Bladder With Urgency Urinary Incontinence
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05977634 -
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01955408 -
Severity of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients After Synergo Treatment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06201013 -
Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin D in the Treatment of OAB-wet in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03727711 -
TPTNS: Home vs Hospital Treatment for Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00768521 -
A Study to Test the Effects of Tolterodine Tartrate in Patients With Overactive Bladder (0000-107)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03625843 -
Mindfulness Exercises to Reduce Anxiety and Pain During Urodynamic Testing
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02211846 -
A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Mirabegron OCAS (Oral Controlled Absorption System) in Pediatric Subjects With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity or Overactive Bladder
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02835846 -
Investigation of the Effect of the Female Urinary Microbiome on Incontinence
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02857816 -
PRospective Study to Evaluate EffectivenesS With the NURO™ PErcutaneous Tibial Neuromodulation System in Patients With OAB
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02202031 -
Controlling Urgency Through Relaxation Exercises
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02320201 -
Foot Neuromodulation for Overactive Bladder in Children
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01423838 -
Comparison of Solifenacin and Oxybutynin in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01409512 -
Evaluation of Autonomic System Before and After Anticholinergic Treatment in Women With Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01458197 -
A Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Tarafenacin 0.2 mg and Tarafenacin 0.4 mg to Placebo in Patients Suffering From Overactive Bladder.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01437670 -
Observational Study to Estimate the Dry Mouth in OAB Patients With Solifenacin
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01210859 -
Effects of Antimuscarinic Drugs on Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms After Insertion of Ureteral Stents
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01758848 -
Physical Therapy for Overactive Bladder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01122550 -
Reproducibility Study of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score [OABSS]
|
N/A |