Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03585309
Other study ID # Ain shamsMH
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 15, 2018
Est. completion date January 31, 2019

Study information

Verified date July 2018
Source Ain Shams University
Contact Ahmed Nagib, MD
Phone +201001403138
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of bipolar electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve.


Description:

Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy is currently considered the treatment of choice in women with benign ovarian cysts and has gained increasing acceptance among gynecologic sur¬geons . However, the safety of this technique in terms of ovarian damage to the operated gonad has recently been questioned. A great deal of evidence supports that the re¬moval of ovarian cysts is associated with injury to the ovarian reserve . Many of these studies involved patients who required assisted reproduction, and they found that the number both of follicles and retrieved oocytes obtained in the operated gonad during ovarian hyperstimulation was markedly reduced when compared with the contralateral intact ovary. However, most of these studies applied ovarian response to gonadotropin hyperstimulation to measure the ovarian reserve. It has been argued that these patients are not representative of all patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in terms of ovarian damage because these data were acquired from aggressive gonadotropin stimulation which is thought to be different from a natural menstrual cycle .

On the other hand, because ovarian reserve cannot be mea¬sured directly, the evaluation of ovarian reserve is difficult to carry out. The induction of ovarian hyperstimulation in an un¬selected population of surgical patients for the purpose of evaluating ovarian reserve is obviously ethically untenable. The serum level of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a predictor of functional ovarian reserve , but its usefulness is limited considering that the vast majority of patients un¬dergo monolateral excision of a cyst and the contralateral in¬tact gonad may completely substitute for reduced function of the operated ovary . Given the well-established role of ul¬trasound scanning in the diagnosis and follow-up of ovarian cysts, reported that basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter could be used as indicators of ovarian reserve. found that the value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity was an initial marker of ovarian reserve before the change of FSH level and ovarian volume.

With the combined use of serum hormonal evaluation and ultrasound examination, the investigators prospectively investigated the ovarian reserve of patients after the excision of benign ovarian cysts. The damage to ovarian reserve was evaluated during through a 12-month follow-up period after the application of bipolar, ultrasonic scalpel electrocoagulation or suture for ovarian cystectomy .


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 96
Est. completion date January 31, 2019
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 20 Years to 35 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age: 20-35 years.

2. Uni-bilateral ovarian cyst(s) size without clinical and sonographic suspicion of ovarian cancer.

3. Regular menstrual cycles defined as a cycle length between 25 and 35 days in the 6 months before surgery.

4. Agreement to be enrolled in the study.

5. Endometriosi.

6. Renal disesase.

7. Liver disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1- Prior ovarian surgery 2- Surgical necessity to perform adnexectomy 3- Known endocrine disease 4- Postoperative pathologic diagnosis that was not benign ovarian cyst 5- Oral contraceptive use before surgery last two months. 6-Addison disease. 7.Thyroid disease.

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts:
Randomization Randomization will be conducted using computer generated table. Group A (48 CASES) without coagulation Group A 6 89 92 35 1 15 21 16 60 49 53 91 34 5 94 64 88 58 7 33 8 75 29 56 10 23 37 19 32 71 55 84 36 77 50 2 46 70 82 9 51 54 72 18 25 31 14 63 Group B (48 CASES) with coagulation Group B 79 38 93 43 52 44 62 47 68 76 86 95 81 83 42 80 94 30 78 61 12 17 66 13 41 59 22 73 39 65 4 90 28 26 3 87 40 85 69 48 27 24 74 57 11 20 67 45 Allocation and concealment Nineteen six opaque envelopes will be numbered serially and in each envelope the corresponding letter which denotes the allocated group will be put according to randomization table then all envelopes will be closed and put in one box. When the first patient arrives the first envelope will be opened and the patient will be allocated according to the letter inside.

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ain Shams University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (1)

Asgari Z, Rouholamin S, Hosseini R, Sepidarkish M, Hafizi L, Javaheri A. Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3918-4. Epub 2015 Oct 22. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of participants (Females) with ovarian cyst or dermid cyst or endometrial Laparascopy without coagulation excision of ovarian cysts and effect of ovarian reserve RESULIT The result of the study is to evaluate the effect of bipolar electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve. 3 months after surgery
Secondary Number of participants (Females) with ovarian cyst or dermid cyst or endometrial Laparascopy with coagulation excision of ovarian cysts and effect of ovarian reserve RESULT The result of the study is to evaluate the effect of bipolar electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve. 3 months after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03717870 - Surgery and ART For Endometrioma N/A
Unknown status NCT01596985 - Ovarian Endometrioma Ablation Using Plasma Energy Versus Cystectomy Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02623244 - The Association Between Ovarian Endometrioma and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Recruiting NCT04151173 - Assessment of Ovarian Reserve After Laparoscopic Cystectomy Versus Aspiration/Electrocoagulation in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma N/A
Completed NCT00989118 - Randomized Study on Endometrioma Treatment Phase 3
Completed NCT06219044 - Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve and Recurrence Rate After DWLS Diode Laser OMA Vaporization N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05837624 - Estetrol/Drospirenone to Reduce the Average Size of Endometriomas Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02350452 - Impact on Ovarian Reserve of Diode Laser vs Bipolar Coagulation of Endometriomas N/A
Completed NCT03615352 - Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy Versus Aspiration and Coagulation in Ovarian Endometrioma N/A
Recruiting NCT05104086 - Ultrasound Elastography in Diffferentiation of Endometriomas and Hemorrhagic Cysts N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03784404 - Trans-vaginal Aspiration of Small Ovarian Endometrioma. Comparison of Two Different Techniques Before ICSI Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05279209 - Catheter-directed Sclerotherapy Versus Surgical Resecction: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ovarian Function and Therapeutic Efficacy After Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma N/A
Recruiting NCT05357924 - Evaluating Ovarian Reserve After Conventional Laparoscopy Versus Robotic Surgery for Bilateral Endometrioma N/A
Recruiting NCT05291624 - Ultrasonographic and Surgical Assessment of Endometriosis by AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification