Clinical trial NCT03659188 - References

Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 — Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines

Citation(s)

•   Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT
  Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.029.
•   Aksakalli S, Calik B, Kara B, Ezirganli S
  Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):59-65. doi: 10.2319/012215-49.1. Epub 2015 May 19.
•   Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B
  Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0146-9. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
•   Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C
  Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017.
•   Buyuk SK, Yavuz MC, Genc E, Sunar O
  A novel method to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Saudi Med J. 2018 Feb;39(2):203-208. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.2.21235.

Evaluation of the Efficiency and Efficacy of Flapless Cortico-alveolar Perforations Using Mechanical Drills Versus Traditional Corticotomy in the Retraction of Upper Canines: a Three-arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Details for clinical trial NCT03659188