Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03431662
Other study ID # PR0251
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 20, 2017
Last updated February 12, 2018
Start date March 2016
Est. completion date March 2017

Study information

Verified date February 2018
Source Ellipse Technologies, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether there is a difference between the TomoFix and Ellipse Intramedullary HTO Nail System in terms of bone regeneration in the tibial wedge by performing a CT-scan at 3 and 6-months postoperatively.


Description:

Malalignment of the knee joint causes arthritis in later life. Currently there are three surgical ways to treat knee arthritis: total knee replacement, partial knee replacement, and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The former two very much focus on treating the effect of malalignment, i.e. removing the arthritic joint. However, HTO addresses the cause of the arthritis, namely the joint malalignment. This preserves the patient's joint and it means that a patient will start using the unaffected part of the knee joint more.

HTO involves cutting a wedge out the tibia to correct the alignment of that bone with the knee joint, to redistribute load from the affected medial part to lateral part. To keep the tibia in the new position, a medical nail device is attached to keep it in place and allow new bone to regenerate within the wedge. Currently, the market leader for HTO is the TomoFix (by DePuySynthes company) plate and nail device. As the name suggests, TomoFix is fixed at surgery and therefore the change in bone angle cannot be changed afterwards. It does mean that patients can be weight-bearing on the affected leg soon after the HTO procedure. A new CE-marked device is being tested in an interventional trial; it is produced by Ellipse Technologies. This device is an extendable nail and inserted intramedullary; following surgery the nail is tend slowly extended over a period of time until the bone correction is satisfactory.

The CISKO imaging study will assess whether there is a difference between the TomoFix and Ellipse system in terms of bone regeneration in the tibial wedge by performing a CT-scan at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. This will be quantified by two independent radiological reports. A secondary objective is to investigate patient satisfaction and also patient pain levels at these time intervals. The degree of bone healing is usually the main factor holding clinicians back when it comes to advising patients on what activities they can return to post-operatively. A difference in bone healing between the two systems may impact on the advice clinicians can give patients regarding recommencing more intense activities such as recreational sports, which ultimately could positively impact patients' health and well-being.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 12
Est. completion date March 2017
Est. primary completion date March 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Male
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Indicated treatment with medial open wedge proximal tibial osteotomy, either with Tomofix device or Ellipse device

2. Provision of written informed consent

3. Males

4. Mental capacity

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Under age (< 18 years)

2. Patients lacking mental capacity.

3. Females

4. Current use of nicotine products.

5. Patients who cannot understand English and therefore cannot be consented.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Ellipse IM HTO Nail
A CT scan will be performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess the healing of the osteotomy site. Endpoint is 6 months.
TomoFix
A CT scan will be performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess the healing of the osteotomy site. Endpoint is 6 months.

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust Carlisle

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ellipse Technologies, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Healing of the osteotomy site Healing of the osteotomy site after final correction as assessed by two independent radiology reports based on visual assessment of the CT imaging. The scoring system is derived from a study by Brosset and colleagues (Brosset et al, 2011). In addition to a pure clinician perspective of the healing process, CT imaging data will also be used to quantify and describe:
definition of osteotomy line,
osteotomy margin,
osteotomy gap,
callus appearances,
callus to cortex ratio,
bridging of the bone, including complete union and healing.
application of region of interest (ROI) to quantify bone density of the callus formation
6-month postoperative
Secondary Visual Analog Pain Scale A patient reported outcome of their perception of pain 6-month postoperative
Secondary Osteotomy patient satisfaction questionnaire A patient reported outcome of the patient's perception of satisfaction with treatment 6-month postoperative
Secondary SF-12 Quality of Life Questionnaire A validated patient reported outcome. 6-month postoperative
Secondary KOOS Knee Health Questionnaire A validated patient reported outcome. 6-month postoperative
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04657926 - A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT02536833 - A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects Phase 2
Completed NCT03014037 - Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration N/A
Recruiting NCT05937542 - A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
Completed NCT03644615 - A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT06061367 - Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
Withdrawn NCT04976972 - A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation N/A
Completed NCT05496205 - A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT03850665 - Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach N/A
Completed NCT02826902 - Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT04402502 - Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT02923700 - Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT04564053 - Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT05070871 - A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05036174 - Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT02912429 - Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT02666443 - Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02723929 - Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
Withdrawn NCT02921594 - Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties N/A
Terminated NCT02820766 - Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting N/A