The Effect of Implant Coating (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup

Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Effect of Implant Coating With Hydroxyapatite Deposited Electrochemically (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02311179
• Other study ID #: M-20110224
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2013
• Est. completion date: August 2024

Study information

• Verified date: December 2022
• Source: University of Aarhus
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study focuses on the effect of the hydroxyapatite coating with BoneMaster on the fixation of the hip prosthesis in primary hip alloplasty. A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray is used. The surface is coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) and will be compared with an identical cup without hydroxyapatite.

Description:

This study focuses on the effect of the hydroxyapatite coating with BoneMaster on the fixation of the hip prosthesis in primary hip alloplasty. A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray is used. The surface is coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) and will be compared with an identical cup without hydroxyapatite. A 5-year radiologic analysis of migration will be carried out with the object of detecting prognostic evidence of prosthesis loosening. Migration is determined by Roentgen Stereo-photogrammetric Analysis (RSA) on stereoroentgenography. Simultaneously, the patients will be monitored by using the clinical outcome measure HOOS (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score), OHS (Oxford Hip Score), EQ-5D (EuroQol), HHS (Harris Hip Score) on range of motion, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), postoperative complications and reoperation.

Hypothesis: We expect that the Exceed cup with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) is superior or equal compared to a similar cup without hydroxyapatite regarding

• mechanical stability (RSA)

• (clinical outcome)

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 56
• Est. completion date: August 2024
• Est. primary completion date: March 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 55 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Symptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis

2. Radiographically and clinically adequate bone quality with regard to a total hip prosthesis, including osteoporosis-Dexa-Scanning verification.

3. Age 55 to 75 years

4. Informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Orthopaedic

1. Other disease of affected hip than primary coxarthrosis at time of inclusion 1.1. Secondary osteoarthritis 1.1.1. sequelae after acetabular fracture 1.1.2. hip-near femoral fracture 1.1.3. calve perthe 1.1.4. dysplasia (severe) 1.1.5. other 1.2 Atraumatic caput necrosis

2. Neuromuscular or vascular condition in one or the other lower extremity

3. Immobilization postoperative for long periods, for instance because of other serious diseases, alloplasties of the other lower-extremity joint, etc (decided by investigator)

4. Reoperation of affected hip because of 4.1 luxation (with closed or open reduction) 4.2 deep infection 4.3 fracture 4.4 aseptic loosening 4.5 other

5. Body Mass Index (BMI) at time of inclusion 81-84 5.1 = 35 kg/m2 (grade 2+3 85, Obese Class I 81) 5.2 < 18,5 kg/m2 81-84

6. Insufficient RSA marker spread or rigidity Operative

7. Use of component other than Bimetric femoral stem (HA porous-coated without collar)

8. Unsuitable bone quality for uncemented hip alloplasty, evaluated preoperatively

9. Complications peroperatively on insertion of hip alloplasty that necessitate deviation for the described operative procedure (see section: "Operative procedure"), among others 9.1 per- and postoperative fracture 9.2 bone graft used peroperatively (treatment of bone defects, cysts, etc.) 9.3 screw fixation of the acetabulum 9.4 gluteal detachment or extensive femoral exposure 9.5 trochanter osteotomy 9.6 Under-reaming 1-2 mm (cup size is one mm larger than the reamer, i.e. reaming 51 mm, cup 52 mm) 9.7 Other Radiographic

10. Cup placement 10.1 Cup inclination in AP (anteroposterior) plan >56 degrees and <35 degrees as evaluated on roentgenogram Medical

11. Osteoporosis 11.1. previously diagnosed 11.2. project-related preoperative DEXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry ) scan Patients with osteoporosis on the scan (T-score < -2.5) are excluded from the study with referral to medical osteoporosis treatment. Patients with osteopenia (T-score < -1) are included in the project with referral to osteoporosis prophylactic treatment. Patients with osteopenia at project inclusion are DEXA re-scanned at the 2 year follow up.

12. Arthritis 12.1. rheumatoid arthritis 12.2. psoriasis arthritis 12.3. other arthritides

13. Metabolic bone disease 13.1. hyperparathyroidism 13.2. Paget bone disease 13.3. renal osteodystrophy 13.4. other

14. Reduced kidney function thereby influencing bone metabolism

15. Previous treatment of skeleton with radiation therapy

16. Cancer Pharmaceuticals

17. Pharmaceuticals that effect calcium-phosphorus metabolism and bone density 87-98, either through intermittent administration or as a constant dose 17.1. glucocorticoids (systemic) beyond short-term treatment (<5 days) 17.2. immunosuppression/modulation (cyclosporine, methotrexate, etc.) Compliance related

18. Absent patient compliance with treatment and follow-up investigations

19. Abuse that the investigator feels would weaken compliance 19.1. alcohol abuse 19.2. medication abuse

20. Psychological instability (including patient in treatment lithium/antidepressants/neuroleptics/ antipsychotic drugs) which the investigator feels would weaken compliance

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Osteoarthritis

Intervention

Device:
• Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup (Biomet)
Patients will be randomized preoperatively to 1) Exceed cup coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) or 2) Exceed cup coated without hydroxyapatite coating.
• Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA (Biomet)
Patients will be randomized preoperatively to 1) Exceed cup coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) or 2) Exceed cup coated without hydroxyapatite coating.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	Aarhus University Hospital	Aarhus

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Aarhus	Aarhus University Hospital, Biomet Denmark Aps, Project coordinator Orthopaedic Centre, Aarhus

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Radiographic: Migration of the acetabular component (mm, degree) with Model-Based RSA (m-RSA)		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	Reoperation of affected hips		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	Postoperative complications (up to 5 years)		End of study
Secondary	HOOS (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score)		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	OHS (Oxford Hip Score)		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	HHS (Harris Hip Score) on Range Of Motion (ROM)		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	VAS (Visual Analog Scale) at rest and load		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	EQ-5D (EuroQol)		End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary	Radiologic osteolysis		End of study (up to 5 years)