Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01961986
Other study ID # 10-02125
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 2010
Est. completion date May 4, 2025

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source NYU Langone Health
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial, of 120 patients requiring a total shoulder replacement (TSR). Purpose: To collect and evaluate long-term clinical data on patients whose total shoulder replacement (TSR) is performed using the traditional surgical approach (called the subscapularis release approach) as compared to patients who have a TSR procedure done using a newer surgical approach (called the rotator cuff sparing approach).


Description:

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial, of 120 patients requiring a total shoulder replacement (TSR). Purpose: To collect and evaluate long-term clinical data on patients whose total shoulder replacement (TSR) is performed using the traditional surgical approach (called the subscapularis release approach) as compared to patients who have a TSR procedure done using a newer surgical approach (called the rotator cuff sparing approach). For patients with arthritis, TSR can successfully improve pain and restore function. As a result, TSR has become the treatment of choice for patients with shoulder arthritis. Despite these generally good outcomes, however, there are concerns that rotator cuff function is suboptimal after surgery. One of the rotator cuff tendons is usually cut during the TSR procedure to insert the prosthesis and then repaired at the end of the surgery. If the tendon does not heal adequately, patients may experience persistent weakness, pain, and even failure of the replacement. Recently, a surgical technique called rotator cuff sparing TSR has been described where the procedure can be performed without ever cutting any of the rotator cuff tendons. As such, there should be minimized risk to the rotator cuff function after the surgery. Our study proposes to enroll two groups of patients with shoulder arthritis. The first group will be treated with the traditional TSR procedure. The second group will be treated with this new rotator cuff sparing surgical technique for TSR where the rotator cuff is never violated. After surgery, we will examine motion, strength, and functional use of the shoulder. In addition, we will specifically test the rotator cuff strength after the surgery. In this fashion, we plan to test the hypothesis that rotator cuff sparing TSR can improve the rotator cuff function while maintaining the excellent pain relief and motion that is normally observed after the traditional TSR procedure. Enrollment: A total of approximately 120 subjects will be enrolled and treated at NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. Subjects participating in the study will be randomly assigned to have their total shoulder replacement done using the traditional surgical approach (called the subscapularis release approach) or by the newer surgical approach (called the rotator cuff sparing approach). For each patient, a number will be created by a random number generator. Patients randomized to the even number (2) will receive a traditional TSA procedure that includes incision and repair of the subscapularis tendon during the procedure. Patients randomized to the odd number (1) will receive the rotator cuff sparing TSA. Regardless of the procedure, patients will remain "blind" to the type of procedure they received until completion of their 2 year follow up. Follow-Up Requirements: Office Visits: Patients' participation will involve five (5) office visits (after surgery) over a period of two (2) years. At each visit, as part of the patients' regular care, they will have standard x-rays of their shoulder. All patients will complete self-administered questionnaires to assess the clinical outcome of the surgery and patients satisfaction. The patient administered outcome questionnaires will include the SF-12, and Patient Assessment Case Report Form.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 108
Est. completion date May 4, 2025
Est. primary completion date May 4, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 21 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patient is indicated for shoulder joint replacement - Patient is at least 21 years of age - Patient is expected to survive at least 2 years beyond surgery - Patient is willing to participate by complying with pre-and post-operative visit requirements - Patient is willing and able to review and sign a study informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: - Prior arthroplasty in the affected shoulder. - Significant deformity of the proximal humerus that requires a custom made implant or where osteotomy of the shaft and / or the tuberosity has to be considered. - Significant medial erosion of the glenoid such that lateral edge of the humeral head lies medial to the lateral rim of the acromion. - Significant injury to the brachial plexus - Inability or unwillingness to participate in the post operative evaluation for the entire 24 months period. - Pregnant and lactating women will be excluded

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
TSR - traditional subscapularis release
Total Shoulder Replacement surgery performed using the traditional subscapularis release approach.
TSR - rotator cuff sparing
Total Shoulder Replacement surgery performed using the rotator cuff sparing approach.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases New York New York

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
NYU Langone Health

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (13)

Armstrong A, Lashgari C, Teefey S, Menendez J, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM. Ultrasound evaluation and clinical correlation of subscapularis repair after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;15(5):541-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.013. Epub 2006 Jul 27. — View Citation

Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS. Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.009. — View Citation

Gerber C, Hersche O, Farron A. Isolated rupture of the subscapularis tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jul;78(7):1015-23. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199607000-00005. — View Citation

Gerber C, Krushell RJ. Isolated rupture of the tendon of the subscapularis muscle. Clinical features in 16 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 May;73(3):389-94. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B3.1670434. — View Citation

Gerber C, Yian EH, Pfirrmann CA, Zumstein MA, Werner CM. Subscapularis muscle function and structure after total shoulder replacement with lesser tuberosity osteotomy and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1739-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02788. — View Citation

Khan A, Bunker TD, Kitson JB. Clinical and radiological follow-up of the Aequalis third-generation cemented total shoulder replacement: a minimum ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Dec;91(12):1594-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22139. — View Citation

Lafosse L, Schnaser E, Haag M, Gobezie R. Primary total shoulder arthroplasty performed entirely thru the rotator interval: technique and minimum two-year outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):864-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.017. Epub 2009 Jun 21. — View Citation

Lo IK, Litchfield RB, Griffin S, Faber K, Patterson SD, Kirkley A. Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2178-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02198. — View Citation

Miller BS, Joseph TA, Noonan TJ, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ. Rupture of the subscapularis tendon after shoulder arthroplasty: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):492-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.013. — View Citation

Miller SL, Hazrati Y, Klepps S, Chiang A, Flatow EL. Loss of subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: A seldom recognized problem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;12(1):29-34. doi: 10.1067/mse.2003.128195. — View Citation

Norris TR, Iannotti JP. Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;11(2):130-5. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.121146. — View Citation

Qureshi S, Hsiao A, Klug RA, Lee E, Braman J, Flatow EL. Subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: results with lesser tuberosity osteotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Nov 19. — View Citation

Tokish JM, Decker MJ, Ellis HB, Torry MR, Hawkins RJ. The belly-press test for the physical examination of the subscapularis muscle: electromyographic validation and comparison to the lift-off test. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;12(5):427-30. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00047-8. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Functional Outcome Patient subjective and objective data will be collected for all patients using the Short Form 12 (SF-12)and Patient Assessment forms. From these forms, both American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) outcome score and the Constant score can be derived to assess functional outcome. Additional data will also be collected specific to the integrity and the function of the subscapularis tendon that include the results of the "belly press" and the "lift off" test. They will be graded as "unable", "maintain against gravity", "maintain against resistance", and "full strength." Preoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04657926 - A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT02536833 - A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects Phase 2
Completed NCT03014037 - Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration N/A
Recruiting NCT05937542 - A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
Completed NCT03644615 - A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT06061367 - Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
Withdrawn NCT04976972 - A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation N/A
Completed NCT05496205 - A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT03850665 - Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach N/A
Completed NCT02826902 - Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT04402502 - Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT02923700 - Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT04564053 - Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT05070871 - A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05036174 - Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT02912429 - Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT02666443 - Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02723929 - Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
Withdrawn NCT02921594 - Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties N/A
Terminated NCT02820766 - Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting N/A