Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Mechanical Loading During Sports Exercises on Degradation of Human Articular Cartilage
Acute effects of physical exercise on the deformational behavior of articular cartilage and
changes in cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) are definite. However, conclusive
positive effects of fitness exercise on functional adaptation of articular cartilage have
not been proved.Therefore, in this parallel-group randomized control trial, the
investigators tested the hypothesis that adequate amount of physical exercise with enough
impact would be able to stimulate the functional behavior of articular cartilage.
The investigators evaluated 44 healthy males for their physical fitness levels and their
blood samples were obtained before, immediately after and 0.5 h after a 30-min walking
exercise. Thereafter, participants were assigned to the running, the cycling, the swimming
and the control groups. At the end of 12-weeks of intervention, same measurement procedures
were applied. Mixed repeated-measures ANOVA design was used for statistics. (Level of
evidence: 2)
Design
A prospective, parallel-group randomized control trial was designed. Mustafa Kemal
University (MKU) Ethical Board approved the study (B.30.2.MKU.0.01.01.00/255). The exact
nature of the study was explained to participants and they were asked to sign a written
consent. The tests were carried out at Middle East Technical University Medical Center,
Ankara, Turkey between January and June 2008. The independent variables were groups (n=4)
and time (n=2). The dependent variable was serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP)
levels measured at three phases of exercise: before (Recovery), immediately after (Fatigue),
and 30-min after the exercise (Regeneration). Participants were subjected to the following
tests prior to and at the end of the intervention period: body mass index (BMI), isokinetic
leg muscle strength, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) and serum COMP levels.
Participants
115 applicants volunteered to take part in this study. Eligibility screening was performed
according to inclusion criteria. From 104 eligible applicants, 48 healthy, sedentary male
university students aged between 18 to 25 years old (Mage = 21.8±1.9) were selected by a
simple drawing. However, study completed with 44 participants, because of 4 dropouts.
Participants were randomly assigned in 1:1:1:1 ratio to parallel groups, three exercise
groups (swimming, cycling and running) and one control. In order to have a random
allocation, each participant received a number unknown to researchers which was written on a
piece of paper and then drawn from a box that allowed to assign individuals to the control
and exercise groups. Baseline blood samples were stored in -80°C and they were not analyzed
during participants' allocation. Exclusion criteria, surveyed by a questionnaire, were:
osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint disease, intra-articular
steroid injection, mal-alignment of the knees (varus/valgus) larger than 15°, and recent
(within six months) fracture of lower extremity. Active athletes and volunteers with
previous sports background were not included. During the intervention period, one
participant was excluded from the study because of sudden kidney disease and another one
decided to withdraw from further participation. In addition, two participants were excluded
from the study before biochemical analyses since one subject from running group didn't meet
minimum requirement of 75% of exercise session attendance, and one subject from control
group didn't complete the posttests. Descriptive data of participants are presented in.
Interventions
After the first measurements, participants were randomly and equally assigned to the
swimming, the running, the cycling and the control groups. All exercise groups participated
in sessions of 40-min per day, three days per week, for a period of 12 weeks. Each session
began with a five minutes warm-up, continued with a main set of 30-min exercise at their
individual target heart rate zone (60-70% of heart rate reserve), and finished with a five
minute cool-down period. The individual target heart rate zone was determined according to
the Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription of American College of Sport Medicines
[1]. Swimming exercises composed of front crawl swimming and kicking drills. During the main
sets, the participants performed front-crawl swimming at their individual heart rate zones
which were determined by the Karvonen formula [2]. Cyclers exercised between 60-80
repetition per minute (RPM) on an ergometer (Monark E 834, Varberg, Sweden), which was
adjusted for each individual in order to maintain the target heart rate zone. The running
group participants exercised on a treadmill with a 1.5 % incline. The speed of the treadmill
was determined according to individual heart rate zone. Throughout the 12 weeks of training,
Heart Rate Reserves (HRR) was held constant (60-70%) while the speed increased according to
individual progression. Individuals of the control group were instructed not to participate
in any organized or structured exercise during the 12 weeks of intervention.
Physical and Physiological Measurements
Body Mass Index was calculated as the ratio of body weight to height square (Heyward &
Stolarczyk 1996). VO2max was measured by the standard Bruce Protocol (Bruce, Kusumi & Hosmer
1973) on a Jager LE 200 CE (Hochberg, Germany) treadmill. Measurements were performed with
the VIASYS Healthcare ergospirometry line using the MasterScreen CPX (Wuerzburg, Germany)
device. Results were presented in ml/kg/min (milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body
weight per minute). Isokinetic quadriceps strength was recorded with the Biodex System
Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Inc, Shirley, NY). Participants were placed in a comfortable
position that allowed unrestricted motion of the knee from 90 degrees of flexion to terminal
extension on a bicycle ergometer, and asked to warm-up for five minutes at which point they
stretched their extremities. Before the test trials, participants were instructed to perform
their maximum efforts. Then five isokinetic concentric knee flexion and extension at 60°/sec
with their dominant legs were recorded. After, peak torque to body weight ratio (PT/BW) was
measured.
Blood Sampling and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Procedures
Blood obtaining procedures were modified from Mundermann et al. [3]. Participants were asked
to limit their physical activity 48 hours prior to the experiment. On the day of the
experiment, participants made their breakfast within one hour after waking up and the
experiment started two to three hours after breakfast. In addition, participants were seated
on a chair for 15-min immediately before the experiment. Five-milliliter blood samples were
obtained by a certified research nurse from the same antecubital vein immediately before,
immediately after, and 0.5 hours after a 30-min walking exercise. During the walking
exercise of the test protocol, participants walked at a pace of 5 km/h on a treadmill with
1.5 % incline. After the walking exercise, participants sat on an office chair for 30-min
and were asked to rest.
Blood sample collection and storage procedures were described previously [4]. Venous blood
samples were obtained from vena mediana cubitii. After clotting for 60 min at room
temperature, samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10-min. The serum samples were stored
at -80°C until analysis.
Serum COMP concentrations were analyzed with a commercially available enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay based on two monoclonal antibodies: COMP ELISA and AnaMar Medical
(Sweden). ELISA analysis was performed in a private institution and assay procedures were
followed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The order of blood samples was mixed
and biochemist was blind to allocation of samples. All blood samples were analyzed
simultaneously to maintain uniform specificity across individuals.
Statistical Procedures
The effects of 12 weeks interventions on general fitness and serum COMP concentrations at
pre-tests and post-tests were analyzed using 4x2 (groups and time) mixed repeated measures
ANOVA for each variable. Paired-samples t-tests were employed for comparison of the serum
COMP concentrations during rest, fatigue and recovery states. In order to decrease the
probability of committing type-1 error, a method of multiple comparisons by Bonferroni
confidence interval adjustment was performed.
Sample size calculation was performed to eliminate type II error. Sample size was calculated
using the G*Power 3.1.3 (Heinrich-Heine-University) software [5]. Significance level was set
at 0.05 and a medium effect size (0.25) with two-sided calculation was used. Effect size
contains the magnitude of difference between groups and values of 0.25, indicates medium
effect of treatment [6]. By these assumptions, to achieve a power of 0.80, a sample size of
36 participants was necessary. Conservatively, 48 subjects were recruited since we expected
a 20% dropout rate due to the demanding nature of the intervention program and our previous
experience.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Screening
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04657926 -
A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02536833 -
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03014037 -
Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05937542 -
A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
|
||
Completed |
NCT03644615 -
A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06061367 -
Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04976972 -
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05496205 -
A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03850665 -
Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02826902 -
Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04402502 -
Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02923700 -
Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04564053 -
Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05070871 -
A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05036174 -
Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02912429 -
Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02666443 -
Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02723929 -
Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT02921594 -
Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02820766 -
Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting
|
N/A |