Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02364414
Other study ID # Rdb394 v6.1
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received January 28, 2015
Last updated September 23, 2015
Start date December 2014
Est. completion date August 2015

Study information

Verified date September 2015
Source Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of measurements derived from a commercially available direct intra-oral scanning system with those taken from plaster study models, and to compare cost implications of both systems.

The investigators will test the hypotheses:

- There is no systematic difference between measurements taken from the Trios scanner and study models.

- There is no difference in the cost of producing digital models.


Description:

Plaster study models produced from moulds of the teeth are a standard component of orthodontic records. They are fundamental to diagnosis and treatment planning, evaluation of treatment progress and results as well as record keeping. (Santoro et al., 2003) Plaster models must be retained for a minimum of 11 years for a medico legal reasons. This leads to problems of storage in terms of space and cost, in addition to the risk of damage because of the brittle nature of the models. These problems therefore highlight the need for an alternative method for producing and storing study models. This study aims to compare the accuracy of measurements derived from a new commercially available direct intra-oral (inside of the mouth) scanning system (3Shape TRIOS (R)) with those taken from plaster study models, and to compare cost implications of both systems. We will use the results to conclude whether direct intra¬oral scanning can replace traditional plaster models produced from moulds of the teeth.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 22
Est. completion date August 2015
Est. primary completion date January 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 11 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Age range 11 years old to 18 years old.

- Orthodontic patients with a range of malocclusions.

- Dentition without abnormal morphology.

- Adult/permanent dentition from the first molar to first molar in both arches.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients under 11 years old and over 18 years old.

- Carious teeth or teeth with significantly altered anatomy.

- Periodontal disease with significant gingival swelling.

Study Design

Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research


Intervention

Device:
3Shape TRIOS (R)
Direct intra-oral scan of teeth and dentition

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Kettering Northamptonshire

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust University College, London

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (17)

Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod. 2003 Sep;30(3):219-23. — View Citation

Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Sep;142(3):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031. — View Citation

Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Feb;14(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22. Review. — View Citation

Han UK, Vig KW, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Sep;100(3):212-9. — View Citation

Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010 May;38(5):323-30. — View Citation

Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2008 Nov;42(11):625-40. — View Citation

Lee SP, Delong R, Hodges JS, Hayashi K, Lee JB. Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches. Clin Anat. 2008 Jan;21(1):27-32. — View Citation

Machen DE. Legal aspects of orthodontic practice: risk management concepts. The diagnostic dilemma. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Apr;99(4):381-2. — View Citation

Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):431-4. — View Citation

Meyer BJ, Mörmann WH, Lutz F. [Optimization of the powder application in the Cerec method with environment-friendly propellant systems]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(12):1462-8. German. — View Citation

Pani SC, Hedge AM. Impressions in cleft lip and palate--a novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Winter;33(2):93-6. — View Citation

Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):298-303. — View Citation

Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):300-4. — View Citation

Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):101-5. — View Citation

Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.028. — View Citation

Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):351-7. — View Citation

Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003 Jun;73(3):301-6. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Measurement of tooth widths, arch lengths, overjet, overbite, crown heights and labio lingual widths All dental study models, and 3D scans will have all the above measurements carried out. There are 22 patients and each will have had study models made and these will be measured twice on two separate occasions, and all scans measured twice.
The measurements will be compared and analysed to see if the 3D scans accurately represent the tooth sizes and measurements that have been carried out on the dental study models (gold standard).
Within six weeks of initial intervention No
Secondary Cost To determine the difference in cost between the two systems within 6 months of initial intervention No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02918240 - How Often Should We See Our Orthodontic Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04105491 - Patient's Expectations, Preferences, Experiences Before, During and After the Treatment With Invisalign® Aligners
Active, not recruiting NCT03967002 - Treatment of the Mandibular Dental Crowding With and Without Corticotomy Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02796911 - Comparative Study of Different Bone Grafts in Accelerating Tooth Movement N/A
Recruiting NCT05650359 - Study of the Use of Orthopulse Photobiomodulation N/A
Completed NCT03765151 - The Effectiveness of Low-level Laser Therapy in Orthodontic Retention for Periodontal-compromised Patients N/A
Completed NCT02901678 - The Effect of Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01475773 - Psychological Assessment of Adults Seeking Orthodontic Treatment N/A
Completed NCT03070444 - Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05814991 - A Cohort Prospective Study of Predictors Influencing the Quality of Visualization of the Operating Field During Orthognathic Surgery
Completed NCT03924726 - Osseous Evidence Behind Micro-osteoperforation in Accelerating Tooth Movement. N/A
Recruiting NCT06380790 - Effect of Laser-aided Csf on the Rate of Leveling and Alignment of Mandibular Anterior Crowding N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00871026 - Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) - Based Planning and Creation of Orthodontic Appliances N/A
Completed NCT05562986 - Impacts of Oral Irrigation in Orthodontic Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT06167278 - Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays N/A
Completed NCT03421886 - Assessment of the Efficacy of the Aerodentis System N/A
Completed NCT03714087 - Occlusal Outcomes by OGS After a Finishing Protocol N/A
Withdrawn NCT03332082 - A Commercial Available Tooth Positioner for the Treatment of Simple Orthodontic Relapse N/A
Completed NCT01246830 - The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00871091 - Study Investigating Tooth Movements With Conventional and Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Supported Fixed Appliances N/A