Occlusal Caries Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Clinical Performance for Recently Introduced Non Coated Glass Ionomer in Occlusal Caries in Posterior Teeth Compared to Conventional Glass Ionomer With Coating: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | June 2020 |
Source | Cairo University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
In patients with occlusal caries in posterior teeth, does the use of recently introduced non
coated glass ionomer provide better clinical performance compared to conventional glass
ionomer with surface coating?
-Primary objective: To evaluate clinical performance of different types of restorations
(Ketac molar with coating and Ketac Universal Aplicap 3M without coating) in occlusal caries
in posterior teeth.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | February 10, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | January 10, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of at least 2 carious class I in same patient. - The absence of tooth mobility. - Presence of contact with opposite teeth without any abnormal occlusion stress for the selected teeth. - Accessible isolation and observable and easily accessible. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with poor oral hygiene. According to DMF or ADA criteria. 2. The presence of any para functional habit. 3. Abnormal occlusion. 4. Any regurgitation problem. 5. Subjects with compromised medical history. 6. Pulpitis, non-vital or endodontically treated teeth. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Cairo University | Cairo | Manial |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface | The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth | during procedure | |
Primary | Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface | The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth | 3 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface | The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth | 6 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface | The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth | 12 months | |
Primary | The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency | Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth | during procedure | |
Primary | The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency | Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth | 3 months | |
Primary | The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency | Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth | 6 months | |
Primary | The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency | Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth | 12 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction | Visual Inspection of the marginal discoloration different from the color of the restorative material and from the color of the adjacent tooth structure | during procedure | |
Primary | Distance penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction | Visual Inspection of the marginal discoloration different from the color of the restorative material and from the color of the adjacent tooth structure | 3 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction | Visual Inspection of the marginal discoloration different from the color of the restorative material and from the color of the adjacent tooth structure | 6 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction | Visual Inspection of the marginal discoloration different from the color of the restorative material and from the color of the adjacent tooth structure | 12 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins | Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time | during procedure | |
Primary | Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins | Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time | 3 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins | Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time | 6 months | |
Primary | Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins | Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time | 12 months | |
Primary | Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration | Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface | during procedure | |
Primary | Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration | Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface | 3 months | |
Primary | Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration | Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface | 6 months | |
Primary | Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration | Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface | 12 months | |
Primary | Distance seen when the side of the explorer is placed tangentially across the restoration, by which it is not touching two opposing cavosurface line angles at the same time. | Visual inspection and explorer to check the shape and structure of the restoration | during procedure | |
Primary | Distance seen when the side of the explorer is placed tangentially across the restoration, by which it is not touching two opposing cavosurface line angles at the same time. | Visual inspection and explorer to check the shape and structure of the restoration | 3 months | |
Primary | Distance seen when the side of the explorer is placed tangentially across the restoration, by which it is not touching two opposing cavosurface line angles at the same time. | Visual inspection and explorer to check the shape and structure of the restoration | 6 months | |
Primary | Distance seen when the side of the explorer is placed tangentially across the restoration, by which it is not touching two opposing cavosurface line angles at the same time. | Visual inspection and explorer to check the shape and structure of the restoration | 12 months | |
Primary | Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus) | Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale | during procedure | |
Primary | Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus) | Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale | 3 months | |
Primary | Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus) | Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale | 6 months | |
Primary | Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus) | Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04532671 -
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Inlays
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06097143 -
Clinical Performance of Flowable Giomer Versus Nanofilled Composite in Conservative Occlusal Cavities
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04354636 -
Management of Occlusal Caries Using Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05969756 -
Early Treatments for Preventing Occlusal Caries Lesions
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06260644 -
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
|
N/A |