Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05747027
Other study ID # EH22-284
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 2024
Est. completion date February 2028

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source NorthShore University HealthSystem
Contact Ghazaleh Rostami Nia, MD
Phone 405-326-8143
Email GRostamiNia@northshore.org
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Obstructive defecatory syndrome (ODS) or inability to completely empty bowel is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with bowel movement. This is a common condition with estimated incidence of 15-20% in the adult female population. Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy is an established surgical technique aimed at restoring rectal support in women with this condition. It is the most common surgery used nowadays to treat ODS. Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy, is an innovative procedure which has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stool entrapment. Currently it is unknown whether one of the procedures mentioned is superior to the other regarding surgical outcomes and patient experience. The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of these two procedures considering their efficacy to improve symptoms. During the study, participants will be randomized to undergo one of two procedures for treatment of inability to completely empty their bowel and/or rectal prolapse: 1) laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy; 2) transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy. Following the procedure, participants will be asked to return to the office for a follow-up visit 2-weeks, 2-, 12- and 24-months after the surgery. During each follow-up visit participants will undergo symptom evaluation, pelvic exam and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound to evaluate surgical success.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 116
Est. completion date February 2028
Est. primary completion date June 2027
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Female, between the age of 18 and 80 2. OD symptoms as indicated by an affirmative response to either questions 7, 8 or 14 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI): 1. Do you feel you need to strain too hard to have a bowel movement? 2. Do you feel you have not completely emptied your bowels at the end of a bowel movement? 3. Does part of your bowel ever pass through the rectum and bulge outside during or after a bowel movement? 3. Rectal hypermobility defined as a compression ratio greater than 50% according to ultrasound 4. Patient planning on undergoing surgery for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse within the next 12 months 5. Patient who is not pregnant and does not intend to become pregnant in the next 2 years 6. Available for 24-months of follow-up 7. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 8. Able to complete study assessments, per clinician judgment 9. Able and willing to provide independent written informed consent 10. Stable cardiovascular and respiratory status to meet candidacy in vaginal or laparoscopic surgeries Exclusion Criteria: 1. Contraindication to abdominal and transvaginal rectopexy in the opinion of the treating surgeon 2. History of previous surgery that included any type of surgery for rectal prolapse 3. Pelvic pain or dyspareunia due to levator ani spasm that would preclude a PMT program 4. Previous adverse reaction to synthetic mesh 5. Current cytotoxic chemotherapy or current or history of pelvic radiation therapy within 12 months 6. History of two inpatient hospitalizations for medical comorbidities in the previous 12 months

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy
Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy is an established surgical technique used to restore rectal support in women with obstructive defecatory syndrome (ODS). It is the most common surgery used to treat ODS. It involves a series of small cuts in the abdomen and the use of mesh to hold the rectum in the correct position.
Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy
Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy is an innovative procedure which has shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stool entrapment. This is a mesh-free and vaginal route procedure.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Endeavor Health Skokie Illinois

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
NorthShore University HealthSystem University of Pittsburgh, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Degree of rectal hypermobility The degree of rectal hypermobility measured via ultrasound (i.e. compression ratio). 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Postoperative pain by pain scale Participants will complete the Pain Scale. No pain will indicate the best outcome whereas the most intense pain imaginable will indicate the worst outcome. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Postoperative pain by an assessment of pain medication use Participants will be asked to indicate whether or not they are taking pain medication. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Postoperative functional activity level Participants will complete the Activity Assessment Scale which measures functional activity. The activity level will be measured on a scale of no difficulty, a little difficulty, some difficulty, a lot of difficulty, not able to do it, and did not do it for other reasons. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Global improvement in bladder function Participants will complete the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The improvement will be measured on a scale of very much better, much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, much worse, and very much worse. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) As a part of the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI) questionnaire, participants will complete the POPDI. The symptoms will be measured on a scale of 0, present, to 4, quite a bit. A higher score will indicate a higher symptom burden. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI) As a part of the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI) questionnaire, participants will complete the CRADI. The symptoms will be measured on a scale of 0, present, to 4, quite a bit. A higher score will indicate a higher symptom burden. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI) As a part of the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI) questionnaire, participants will complete the UDI. The symptoms will be measured on a scale of 0, present, to 4, quite a bit. A higher score will indicate a higher symptom burden. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Pelvic floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) Participants will complete PFIQ, a condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. The measurement will be on a scale of 0, not at all, to 3, quite a bit. Higher scores indicate greater impact. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) Participants will complete SF-36 which measures eight scales: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Higher scores indicate better health status. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Participants will complete EQ-5D, an instrument that evaluates quality of life on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The measurement will be on a scale of 1 to 5. 24 months post-operatively
Secondary Brink Scale Participants will complete the Brink Scale, a digital assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength. It consists of 3 separate 4-point rating scales for pressure, vertical finger displacement, and duration. 24 months post-operatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00735605 - Comparative Study Between Surgical and Non Surgical Treatment of Anismus in Patients N/A