Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Biosensor experience |
Children's and parents' level of physical (dis)comfort of wearing the wristband, degree of satisfaction with the design, concerns of stigmatization and data security as well as usability. There are 13 multiple choice questions answered on a 4-point scale (0 = disagree a lot - 3 = agree a lot ) and one open-ended question. |
Week 7 |
|
Other |
Wristband compliance |
Number of hours parents and children wear the wristband |
Weeks 0 - 8 |
|
Other |
Adverse reactions - wristband |
Negative effects of the wristband defined as the count of events reported by the parent, child or case worker. |
Weeks 0-8 |
|
Other |
Subjective unit of distress |
Patients rate their level of distress on an 11-point scale (0= no distress; 10 = unbearable distress) during exposure and response prevention sessions. |
Week 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Symptom hierarchy |
Patients rate their level of distress associated with current OCD symptoms on an 11-point scale (0= no distress; 10 = unbearable distress) on a weekly basis. |
Week 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Biochemical synchrony |
Correlations between child and parent oxytocin level and response child and parent. |
Week 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Salivary oxytocin level-child |
Concentration of oxytocin in child saliva calculated using Matlab-7 according to relevant standard curves. |
Weeks 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Salivary oxytocin level-parent |
Concentration of oxytocin in parent saliva calculated using Matlab-7 according to relevant standard curves. |
Weeks 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Salivary oxytocin response-parent |
Change in oxytocin in parent saliva. |
Weeks 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Salivary oxytocin response-child |
Change in oxytocin in child saliva. |
Weeks 0 and 8 |
|
Other |
Family Accommodation Scale - Parent Report (FAS-PR) |
Self-rated degree of parental involvement in child OCD symptoms. 13-item measure with 4 subscales: Modifying routines, Participating in rituals, Parental distress caused by accommodating and Child consequences for not accommodating. Parents report the frequency of their accommodating behavior within the past week on 9 items and the severity of stress and consequences on 4 items on a five-point scale (0=never/no to 4= daily/extreme). Total and subscales scores are obtained by summing items. |
Weeks 0, 4, and 8 |
|
Other |
Family Environment Scale - Parent Report (FES) |
Self-rated questionnaire in which parents report how they perceive their current family environment. 54 items from the following six subscales are used: 1. Cohesion, 2. Expressiveness, 3. Conflict, 4. Independence, 5. Organization, 6. Control. There are three FES forms (real, ideal, and expectations); only the FES real form will be used, which examines a family member's perception of the family as it is. The scale ranges from 10 to 40, with a score of 10 being representative of no family control and a score of 40 being representative of the greatest magnitude of family control. Therefore, a decrease in score represents a decrease in self-reported family control. |
Weeks 0 |
|
Other |
Parental Stress Scale (PSS) |
Self-rated degree of stress related to parenting identified child. 18 items rated on 5-point scales. Positively statements are reverse scored. Scores range between 18 and 90. Higher scores reflect greater stress. |
Weeks 0, 4, and 8 |
|
Other |
KIDSCREEN-52 |
Health-related Quality of Life Screening Instrument for Children and Adolescents. Self- and parent-ratings subjective health and well-being on 52 items on 10 subscales. Rasch scores are computed for each dimension (subscale) and are transformed into T-values with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and well-being. |
Week 0 and Week 8 |
|
Other |
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) |
42-item measure of negative emotional states in adults. Self-rated on a 4-point scale. Scores for Depression, Anxiety and Stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. Higher scores indicate more depression, anxiety and stress. |
Weeks 0 |
|
Other |
Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) score |
Semi-structured clinical interview that measures OCD symptom severity. 10 items, rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme severity), are summed to obtain a total score that can range from 0 to 40. An obsession severity score is obtained by summing the items 1-5. A compulsion severity score is obtained by summing items 6-10. |
Week 0 and Week 8 |
|
Other |
Clinical Global Impression Severity and Clinical Global Impressions Improvement (CGI-I) |
Change in severity of psychopathology. At baseline, the one-item CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (severely ill). CGI-I scores range from 1 (large improvement) through to 7 (large increase in severity). |
Week 0-8 |
|
Other |
OCD symptom remission |
30% or more reduction in CY-BOCS score by Week 8. Dichotomous variable. |
Week 0 and Week 8 |
|
Primary |
Binary feasibility |
Binary feasibility outcomes in terms of recruitment, retention, biosensor functionality, acceptability of the biosensor, adherence to wearing the biosensor, adverse reactions to the biosensor, and physiological, audio, and visual signals as markers of OCD distress, severity and family dynamics. "Success" indicates that the a priori feasibility criteria have been met; "revise" indicates that the criteria have not been met. |
Baseline to Week 8 |
|