Virtual Reality Fall Education for Caregivers

Nurse's Role Clinical Trial

Official title:

Creating a Safe Inpatient Environment-Can Virtual Reality Fall Education Change Caregiver's Attitudes and Behaviors?

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05161117
• Other study ID #: 21-247
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: June 2024
• Source: The Cleveland Clinic
• Contact: Rose Hosler, BSN
• Phone: 216-317-0292
• Email: hoslerr[@]ccf.org
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Falls place a huge financial burden on healthcare delivery systems, as well as physical and emotional harm to patients and families. Nurses are responsible for identifying fall risks and educating patients about fall risks and prevention, but first must have a thorough understanding of fall risk hazards themselves. The purpose of the study is to determine if enhanced education for caregivers using Virtual Reality simulation increases self-reported use of environmental fall risk interventions, and perceived effectiveness of those interventions, for caregivers on a medical-surgical unit. A secondary purpose is to explore the relationship between perceived effectiveness, unit norms, availability of resources, and self-reported behavior related to the use environmental interventions.

The study will use a matched-pair, clustered randomized controlled trial design. The setting is eight medical-surgical units across four hospitals. Unit-pairs at each hospital will be randomly assigned to control or intervention group. The sample will consist of clinical registered nurses and patient care nursing assistants. All participants will receive standard online fall risk education. Participants from the intervention units will also complete virtual reality simulation education delivered via an app on an iPhone that is attached to a headset. The Injurious Fall Risk Factors and Fall Prevention Interventions Survey will be used at baseline, 1 month post-, and 3 months post-education to measure perceived effectiveness, self-reported use, unit peer use, and availability of resources for use of environmental fall prevention interventions. A sample size of 30 participants per nursing unit will be needed for 90% power to detect mean differences of at least 0.5 points between groups.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 288
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• part-time and full-time registered nurses (RNs), Assistant Nurse Managers (ANMs), and patient care nursing assistants (PCNAs);

• participants must have greater than 50% of work time in direct patient care

Exclusion Criteria:

• holds PRN (as needed) or float position

• newly employed or in orientation at the time of the study

• reported history of dizziness or motion sickness

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Accidental Fall
• Nurse's Role

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Virtual reality simulation app for caregiver education
Using a virtual reality headset/goggles, caregivers will engage with an interactive app experience to identify and mediate fall risk hazards in the inpatient care environment. The app will present a hospital bedroom and bathroom laden with fall risks. As the caregiver progresses through the experience, the caregiver will ambulate (virtually) through the environment with the goal of identifying fall risks inherent within that inpatient setting. Fall risks will be targeted and identified using the app "sighting" function and after focusing on the fall risk for the allotted "marking" time, will "self-resolve."
• online fall prevention education module
Participants in both intervention and control groups will complete a 20 minute online module: Management of the Patient at Risk for Falls, through the MyLearning education platform. Most caregivers would have taken this module during competencies or orientation, but at various times. It will be taken by all participants in this study to serve as a baseline understanding of identifying and caring for patients at risk for falls. Participants will be enrolled in the module by a member of the research team, and learner transcripts will available through MyLearning education to confirm completion.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Cleveland Clinic Avon Hospital	Avon	Ohio
United States	Cleveland Clinic Hillcrest Hospital	Mayfield Heights	Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The Cleveland Clinic

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (12)

Bouldin EL, Andresen EM, Dunton NE, Simon M, Waters TM, Liu M, Daniels MJ, Mion LC, Shorr RI. Falls among adult patients hospitalized in the United States: prevalence and trends. J Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;9(1):13-7. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182699b64. — View Citation

Clyburn TA, Heydemann JA. Fall prevention in the elderly: analysis and comprehensive review of methods used in the hospital and in the home. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Jul;19(7):402-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201107000-00003. — View Citation

Fehlberg EA, Lucero RJ, Weaver MT, McDaniel AM, Chandler AM, Richey PA, Mion LC, Shorr RI. Impact of the CMS No-Pay Policy on Hospital-Acquired Fall Prevention Related Practice Patterns. Innov Aging. 2017 Nov;1(3):igx036. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx036. Epub 2018 Feb 2. — View Citation

Florence CS, Bergen G, Atherly A, Burns E, Stevens J, Drake C. Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):693-698. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15304. Epub 2018 Mar 7. — View Citation

Haerling KA. Cost-Utility Analysis of Virtual and Mannequin-Based Simulation. Simul Healthc. 2018 Feb;13(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000280. — View Citation

Hemming K, Girling AJ, Sitch AJ, Marsh J, Lilford RJ. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 30;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-102. Erratum In: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0292-x. — View Citation

Pottle J. Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Healthc J. 2019 Oct;6(3):181-185. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0036. — View Citation

Slade SC, Carey DL, Hill AM, Morris ME. Effects of falls prevention interventions on falls outcomes for hospitalised adults: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e017864. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017864. — View Citation

Soong C, Shojania KG. Education as a low-value improvement intervention: often necessary but rarely sufficient. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 May;29(5):353-357. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010411. Epub 2019 Dec 16. No abstract available. — View Citation

Tzeng HM, Yin CY. Most and least helpful aspects of fall prevention education to prevent injurious falls: a qualitative study on nurses' perspectives. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Sep;23(17-18):2676-9. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12295. Epub 2013 Jul 2. No abstract available. — View Citation

Tzeng HM, Yin CY. Most frequently observed risk factors for adult inpatient injurious falls in hospitals. Clin Nurse Spec. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(6):314-22. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3182a87271. — View Citation

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Change from baseline rating of perceived unit norms for use of environmental fall prevention interventions at 1 month and 3 months post intervention	Unit norms for use of environmental fall prevention interventions is measured by rating the frequency that participants observe the use of each intervention by peers on the unit (1=rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always, or NA=not applicable/no knowledge).	baseline, 1 month after intervention, and 3 months after intervention
Other	Change from baseline rating of availability of resources to implement environmental fall prevention interventions at 1 month and 3 months post intervention	Availability of resources to implement environmental fall prevention interventions is measured by rating how often resources limit the implementation each intervention. (1=Never, 2=Occasionally, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always or NA=not applicable/no knowledge). Scores will be reversed coded for analysis.	baseline, 1 month after intervention, and 3 months after intervention
Primary	Change from baseline rating of self-reported use of environmental fall prevention interventions at 1 month and 3 months post intervention	Using the Injurious Fall Risk Factors and Fall Prevention Interventions Survey, Part II (Tzeng & Yin, 2013), caregivers are asked to rate 23 interventions for reducing falls or injuries using a 5-point likert scale. Self-reported use of environmental fall prevention interventions is measured by rating the frequency of each intervention used by the participant in his or her practice over the last 30 days (1=rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always, or NA=not applicable/no knowledge).	baseline, 1 month after intervention, and 3 months after intervention
Secondary	Change from baseline rating of perceived effectiveness of environmental fall prevention interventions at 1 month and 3 months post intervention	Using the Injurious Fall Risk Factors and Fall Prevention Interventions Survey, Part II (Tzeng & Yin, 2013), caregivers are asked to rate 23 interventions for reducing falls or injuries using a 5-point likert scale. Perceived effectiveness of environmental fall prevention interventions is measured by rating the effectiveness of each of the 23 interventions for reducing falls or injuries (1=Never effective, 2=Occasionally effective, 3=Sometimes effective, 4=Often effective, 5=Always effective or NA=not applicable/no knowledge).	baseline, 1 month after intervention, and 3 months after intervention