View clinical trials related to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Filter by:This 2 arms study will compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with sequential erlotinib plus docetaxel therapy versus docetaxel alone as second line treatment in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive in group 1(experimental arm): docetaxel :75 mg/m² IV day 1 every 3 weeks with erlotinib:150 mg/d per os d2-d16 and group 2 (control arm): docetaxel :75 mg/m² IV day 1 every 3 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression. Target sample size is 156. The main of this study is to determine the relevance of the association sequential erlotinib and docetaxel in terms of progression-free survival .
Contrast enhancement ultrasonography（CEUS）could be used to evaluate the blood flow perfusion liver cancer. In this clinical trial, CEUS was used to evaluated the changes of blood flow perfusion of Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver after treated with endostatin plus paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen.
This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours. Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 iv on Day 1.
In the treatment of advanced cancer, maximizing quality of life (QoL) is a fundamental goal for oncologists and their patients. In order to achieve this goal, some form of systematic and reliable QoL assessment is needed in routine clinical practice to evaluate the impact of advanced cancer treatments on QoL. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a validated site-specific QoL measure designed for use in patients with lung cancer undergoing treatment. Recently it has been developed into an electronic form that uses a hand-held pocket personal computer (pc) to enhance collection and presentation of QoL assessments into clinical trials and patient care. This study will evaluate the impact of this computer-generated QoL (LCSS-QL) assessment on treatment practices for advanced lung cancer patients using a randomized trial design. The investigators hypothesize that a Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program will positively impact treatment patterns for patients with lung cancer. Specifically, the investigators hypothesize: 1. Use of the LCSS-QL will increase and accelerate referral to and use of palliative care services; 2. Use of the LCSS-QL will decrease the duration of palliative chemotherapy treatment with earlier identification of lack of benefit in some patients; 3. Use of the LCSS-QL may decrease the use of imaging tests to assess objective tumor response as an indicator of treatment benefit. Maximizing quality of life is one of the most important goals of palliative chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. If this simple practical tool can be demonstrated to improve palliative management of these patients, including optimizing duration of chemotherapy and use of palliative and supportive services based on patient QoL response, this will dramatically improve the quality of care provided to advanced lung cancer patients. This study will also provide a springboard for other ways to incorporate computer-generated QoL measurement in treatment decision-making in advanced cancer patients, including in other tumor types such as advanced breast and colorectal cancer.
Lung cancer, the most common cancer worldwide, remains the leading cause of cancer death. Approximately two-thirds of all patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with advanced stage that palliative chemotherapy is the only appropriate measure. The standard treatment for this patient population consists of third generation platinum-based doublet regimen for no more than 6 cycles followed by watch and wait until disease progression (PD) before the administration of second-line and third-line systemic anticancer therapeutic agents. Patients who go on to receive second-line therapy represent a selected subgroup with an improved overall prognosis. Switch maintenance therapy with pemetrexed or erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC without PD after first-line chemotherapy has been confirmed to improve progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) significantly compared with placebo in two large randomized controlled studies. However, continuation gemcitabine maintenance therapy in this setting yields conflicting results in the west, i.e.showing a prolongation of PFS without OS improvement. Thus, we investigate the efficacy and safety of continuation of gemcitabine maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic NSCLC with ECOG performance status of 0-1 and without PD after four cycles of first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in China.
The purpose of this protocol is to allow continued treatment with conatumumab and/or ganitumab, with or without chemotherapy, to participants who completed a separate Amgen-sponsored conatumumab or ganitumab study without disease progression whose previous studies were closed.
The purpose of this study is to determine efficacy of SB injection in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
The purpose of this two-stage phase II study is to assess the efficacy of BKM120, as measured by determining the progression free survival (PFS), in patients with pretreated metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that exhibits PI3K pathway activation. BKM120 will be investigated in two groups of NSCLC patients according to the histology of the cancer: squamous and non-squamous.
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Tarceva versus combination of Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIIA-N1,N2 NSCLC with EGFR activating mutation in exon 19 or 21.
This is a phase II, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label study evaluating the combination of pemetrexed plus carboplatin in HIV-positive patients with lung cancer.