Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Clinical Trial
Official title:
36-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Adhesive Strategies of a Universal Adhesive
Verified date | May 2019 |
Source | Hacettepe University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the performance of a universal adhesive with different adhesive strategies in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over a 36-month period.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 35 |
Est. completion date | September 2, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 81 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - over 18 years old - good oral hygiene - available for recall - at least 20 teeth under occlusion - the presence of at least three non-carious cervical lesions Exclusion Criteria: - poor oral hygiene - bruxism habits - severe or chronic periodontitis - If the teeth selected for study, were nonvital, or had any restorations on other surfaces were not included. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Hacettepe University | Ankara |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hacettepe University |
Turkey,
Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Feb 28. — View Citation
Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015 Oct;43(10):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 29. — View Citation
Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):113-27. doi: 10.2341/13-045-C. Epub 2013 Jun 26. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Marginal adaptation | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores; Alfa: Closely adapted, no visible crevice. Bravo: Visible crevice, explorer will penetrate. Charlie: Crevice in which dentin is exposed | From baseline to 36 month | |
Primary | Marginal staining | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal staining. Marginal staining was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores: Alfa: No discoloration. Bravo: Discoloration without. Charlie: Discoloration with penetration in pulpal direction | From baseline to 36 month | |
Primary | Retention | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No loss of restorative material. Charlie: Any loss of restorative material | From baseline to 36 month | |
Primary | Postoperative sensitivity | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: Not present. Bravo: sensitive but diminishing in intensity. Charlie:constant sensitivity, not diminishing in intensity | From baseline to 36 month | |
Primary | Seconder caries | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No caries present. Charlie: Caries present | From baseline to 36 month |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06359093 -
Prevalence Of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions, Associated Risk Indicators and Salivary Assessment Among Middle Adulthood Patients.
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04707898 -
Clinical Evaluation of Different Universal Adhesive Systems in Non-carious Cervical Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05029479 -
the Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) Compared to the Conventional Universal Adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01947192 -
Chlorhexidine as Coadjuvant in Dentin Adhesion of Noncarious Cervical Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06465849 -
Evaluation of the Reduced Dentin Etching Time Using Universal Adhesives in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05945173 -
Evaluation of the Solvent Evaporation Time of Universal Adhesives in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03637946 -
Release of Organic Components of a GIOMER in Non-carious Cervical Lesion Restorations
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04565938 -
Clinical Performance of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions at 2 Years
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03086720 -
Deproteinization as a Coadjuvant in Dentin Adhesion of Noncarious Cervical Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01506830 -
Cervical Restorations Placed Under Two Isolation Methods
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06238999 -
Split-mouth Study of a New Flowable Composite in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03153969 -
Clinical Evaluation of a New Giomer Restorative System in Class V Restorations
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06364020 -
Assessment of Risk Factors in Patients With Non-carious Cervical Lesions
|