View clinical trials related to Neuromuscular Blockade.
Filter by:This study aims to investigate the possible clinical effect of dexamethasone on the action of sugammadex when it is administered to reverse deep neuromuscular blockade caused by rocuronium in laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
Muscle relaxants are administered to most patients undergoing general anesthesia in order to facilitate the placement of an endotracheal tube and improve operating conditions. Despite routine reversal of these agents, many patients arrive in the recovery room with evidence of residual muscle weakness. Many studies have demonstrated that residual neuromuscular blockade (weakness) is a common occurrence after surgery. The only method of reliably detecting the presence of perioperative neuromuscular blockade is through the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors. These devices measure and quantify the degree of muscle weakness and display the results on a screen. When using train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation, the ratio of the fourth muscle contraction (twitch) to the first twitch will be displayed; when this ratio is 90% (or 0.9) or greater, full recovery of muscle strength is present, and the endotracheal tube can be safely removed. At the present time, there is only one commercially-available stand-alone quantitative monitor available in the United States -the TOF-Watch (an acceleromyography device). It is not used by many clinicians because it requires experience to obtain accurate results, is expensive, and is subject to interference by factors in the operating room. The aim of this investigation is to examine a new quantitative monitor, the TOFscan (a new three dimensional acceleromyography device). In order to study the accuracy of this new device, the TOFscan will be compared to the current "clinical gold standard", the TOF-Watch-SX.
The primary objective of this trial is to compare the preference between two strategies of neuromuscular blocking (NMB) / reversal in adult obese patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery: Rocuronium + Sugammadex versus Succinylcholine + Cisatracurium + Neostigmine/Atropine. This will be done evaluating the average verbal numerical scale (VNS) scores obtained from surgeons blinded to the drugs administered. The primary hypothesis is that the strategy "Rocuronium + Sugammadex" provides a better surgical visual field in obese participants undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery than the strategy "Succinylcholine + Cisatracurium + Neostigmine/Atropine" as measured by VNS scores.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether the association of sciatic nerve block to continuous adductor canal block is effective in the treatment of total knee arthroplasty post operative pain .
The purpose of this study is characterize the dose-effect relationship of rocuronium bromide at the adductor pollicis and masseter muscles using an pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model. The hypothesis is that masseter muscle has a greater sensitivity to the neuromuscular blockers (rocuronium), faster onset and slower recovery profile than the adductor pollicis muscle.
This study aims to make a comparison of surgical condition and recovery time between rocuronium 0.45 mg/kg and neostigmine group and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and sugammadex group.
During lumbar spine fusion surgery intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is in routine use for prevention of possible nerve injuries during placement of screw into pedicle. Pedicle screw stimulation test is performed to assess if screw placement is encroaching on the nerve roots. Relative distance between the pedicle screw and the neighbouring root can be estimated by the intensity of the current required to activate the root and appropriate muscle. A properly placed screw can be distinguished from those perforating the pedicle wall by its higher minimum level of electrical current needed to elicit a muscle response. The minimum level is deemed as threshold. This test is based on compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) should be avoided because of possible cause of false negative results of screw stimulation test. Neuromuscular blocking agents, which are in routine use during anesthesia, will have effect on muscle action potential. When NMBA are used current stimulus will depolarize the same number of axons and the associated muscle response will be present but of lower amplitude because some percentage of motor fibers will be blocked by activity of NMBA. At this point, stronger stimulus is needed to recruit additional axons/muscle fibers , and hence, the measured threshold is elevated. Train of four (TOF) test is method used to determine level of neuromuscular blockade, by stimulation of peripheral nerve and following induced muscle contractions. Interpretation of muscle contractions may be by subjective (visual) or objective (quantitative) method. Quantitative TOF test may be used prior screw stimulation test by calculating T4/T1 ratio and obtaining quantitative value which shows level of neuromuscular blockade. Residual neuromuscular blockade may be present before screw stimulation test, and effect on accuracy of this test in this situation was not clearly investigated in recent studies. The purpose of this study would be to determine changes of screw stimulation thresholds under different range of neuromuscular blockade.Therefore, acceptable neuromuscular blockade threshold (determined by TOF test) acceptable for obtaining reliable screw stimulation test should be determined. Screw stimulation test may be performed when neuromuscular blockade is absent and compared to repeated screw stimulation test when neuromuscular blockade is present. Different levels of neuromuscular blockade may provide different results on screw stimulation test, so if difference is statistically significant, induced neuromuscular blockade level may be set as threshold value, acceptable for obtaining reliable testing results.
At the end of anesthesia it's important to avoid residual neuromuscular block to ensure adequate respiratory function preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. This trial compares the neuromuscular block reversal with different drugs (sugammadex vs neostigmine) after thoracic anesthesia. The trial main objective is to demonstrate that sugammadex is faster than neostigmine to reach a Train-of-four-Ratio (TOF-ratio) of 0.9 after thoracic anesthesia, demonstrating that sugammadex allows a faster extubation. Other main purpose is to verify if there is a difference between sugammadex and neostigmine as regards adverse events after extubation and in the postoperative period (until the 30th day after surgery). Note: TOF-ratio is defined as the ratio of the fourth muscular twitch/first twitch value during an accelerometric train-of-four stimulation.
TetraGraph is a newly developed EMG-based, quantitative, battery-powered neuromuscular monitoring system intended for daily clinical use. The primary aim of this clinical investigation is to examine the applicability (ease of use, equipment need, etc.), repeatability (precision or internal consistency) and performance (signal quality, accuracy of outcome, voltage of stimulation output before and during a stimulus) of the Tetragraph device in patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring neuromuscular blockade.
Monitoring the degree of neuromuscular blockade in general anaesthesia reduces complications and patient discomfort. However, monitoring is not applied consistently by Danish anaesthesia personnel. Surveys show that part of the explanation is that the anaesthetists often experience problems with the equipment used for monitoring, though the problems have not been described in detail. We hypothesise that the lack of consistent monitoring in general anaesthesia is caused by insecurity in the anaesthesia personnel's set-up and use of the equipment, as well as in interpreting the measurement results.