Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05864040
Other study ID # PL-PR01-027
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 11, 2023
Est. completion date June 20, 2023

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source Rob Surgical Systems S.L.
Contact Jaume Amat
Phone +34 93 013 08 83
Email jaume.amat@robsurgical.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The HYbrid RObotic Surgery in urology (HYROS) study is an early feasibility clinical investigation of a new medical device under the commercial name of Bitrack System. Bitrack System is a surgical robot indicated to be used during urological surgical procedures, general abdominal laparoscopic surgical procedures, and gynecological laparoscopic surgical procedures. The Bitrack System also requires the specific single use of endoscopic (both electrosurgical -ESE- and non-electrosurgical -NESE-) surgical instruments. The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Bitrack System and its corresponding ESE and NESE instruments and accessories in patients with the indication of a robot assisted laparoscopic radical/simple nephrectomy. Additionally, this investigation will collect initial clinical evidence for the process of obtaining CE Mark


Description:

The Bitrack System is a surgical robot indicated to be used during urological surgical procedures, general abdominal laparoscopic surgical procedures, and gynecological laparoscopic surgical procedures. This robot is intended to assist in the accurate control of endoscopic instruments and accessories for visualization and endoscopic manipulation. Robotic Assisted Surgical (RAS) systems and equipment such as Bitrack System are intended for use in invasive surgical procedures, during which patients are potentially most vulnerable to physical harm. The clinical benefits of the use of the Bitrack System include the minimization of trauma and tearing around the incision thanks to passive joints in robotic arms that allow to avoidance of the stress forces in the fulcrum point that can damage the tissues. The Bitrack System comprises a console, a robotic unit, and embedded software. The HYROS clinical investigation will be conducted as a single-center, early feasibility, and first-in-human (FIH) clinical investigation with a single arm, open-label, and non-randomized design, that will include 3 patients. This clinical investigation aims to evaluate the safety and performance of the Bitrack System in patients indicated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic Radical/simple nephrectomy surgery. The data gathered in this study will be used to support the initial stages of clinical evidence collection for CE Mark of the Bitrack System. The data collected in this study will be used to design additional clinical investigations using an appropriately powered sample size to enable further assessment of the study safety and performance endpoints of the Bitrack System in the intended populations. The planned visits for this clinical investigation are baseline (includes Screening, baseline visit, and Informed consent), procedure, discharge, 14-Days Follow-up visit, and 30-Days Follow-up visit (remote). The clinical investigation will include adult subjects (between 18 and 90 years old) who have been scheduled for laparoscopic radical/simple nephrectomy. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 4 months, consisting of approximately 3 months of enrollment plus 1 month of follow-up. The end of the clinical investigation will occur when the last visit of the last enrolled subject is completed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 3
Est. completion date June 20, 2023
Est. primary completion date May 26, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Adult subjects between 18 and 90 years old - Subjects must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical investigation related procedure - Subjects who have been scheduled for a laparoscopic radical/simple nephrectomy surgery - Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements to be evaluated for each study visit Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant or breastfeeding women at the time of the surgery - Inability to adhere to study-related procedures - Subject has known allergy to some of the device components (i.e., stainless steel, etc.) - Subjects who participate in another trial which may affect the outcome data on this study or the ability to complete the follow-up requirements - Subjects not suitable to undergo MIS/MIRS, according to medical criteria - Subjects with life expectancy inferior to 3 months - Subjects with a BMI = 40 - Subjects with severe cardiopulmonary or coronary artery disease, bleeding disorders or that have been submitted to multiple prior operations - Subjects with abuses of active substances or with uncontrolled psychiatric disorders - Subjects scheduled for surgeries intended to be in direct contact with the heart, the central circulatory system or the central nervous system - Subjects with any contraindication for the use of the Bitrack System and the ESE/NESE instruments, as specified in the Instructions For Use

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Bitrack System-assisted laparoscopic radical/simple nephrectomy
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Radical/Simple Nephrectomy is performed under general anesthesia. Using blunt dissection, the inferior pole of the kidney is lifted, and ureter and gonadal veins released from fat and connective tissue. The ureter is dissected caudally and sectioned after being sealed with a distal endoscopic clip. Dissection proceeds along the psoas muscle with anterior elevation of the ureter and lower renal pole towards the hilium. Main hilar are circumferentially dissected and sectioned and the kidney is entirely mobilized and released. Gerota´s capsule and suprarenal gland may be preserved if oncologically safe. Once the specimen is completely released, a laparoscopic bag is introduced by the assistant and the specimen entrapped. The robot is undocked, gas evacuated from the abdomen and specimen retrieved. Abdominal wall incisions over 10mm are closed using a continuous suture. Skin incisions are closed using skin staplers.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Rob Surgical Systems S.L.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Safety of the Bitrack System Evaluation of the safety of the Bitrack System by measuring the occurrence of Procedure-Related Adverse Events (PRAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) during the procedure and through the 30 days post-procedure period of enrolled patients indicated for robot assisted laparoscopic radical/simple nephrectomy 30 days post-procedure
Primary Performance of the Bitrack System Evaluation of the performance of the investigational devices by means of its ability to access and reach the target zone, perform all relevant surgical tasks and to be withdrawn efficiently without conversion to MIS or open surgery. The performance of the Bitrack System and the ESE/NESE instruments will be analyzed through the conversion rate to conventional laparoscopy/open surgery During the procedure
Secondary Incidence of AEs All AE(s) events during the procedure and through the 30 days postprocedure will also be assessed, and therefore relationship with the investigational device and/or procedure will be examined by the principal investigator. Procedure, discharge (up to one week post-procedure), 14 days and 30 days follow-up
Secondary Number of participants without unwanted injure of any tissue Individual safety (i.e., absence of unwanted injure of any tissue) for each instrument surgical function. During the rocedure
Secondary Individual performance Individual performance (VAS scale 0-10 following the subjective surgeon's opinion, being 0 a non-functional tool and 10 an instrument that works exactly equivalent to the surgeon/s hands) for each instrument surgical function. During the procedure
Secondary Blood Loss Blood Loss defined as estimated mL of blood loss During the procedure
Secondary Transfusion rates Transfusion rates During the procedure
Secondary Number of participants that require hemostatic agents. Number of participants that require the use of hemostatic agents. During the procedure
Secondary Operative Time Procedure Operative Time Procedure measurement for the different tasks. During the procedure
Secondary Post-operative pain Evaluation of the post-operative pain in patients through the Cumulative Analgesic Consumption Score (CACS) during the first week (7days) post-procedure Discharge (up to one week post-procedure)
Secondary Length of Stay (LoS) in hospital Assessment of the duration of subject's hospitalization as the Length of Stay (LoS) in hospital calculated from day of admission to day of discharge. Discharge (up to one week post-procedure)
Secondary Patient pain assessment Patient pain assessment via VAS (Visual Analog Score for pain) on a scale from 0 ('no pain') to 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be') . Discharge (up to one week post-procedure) , 14- and 30-days post-procedure
Secondary Post-procedure complication rates - comprehensive complication index (CCI) Post-procedure complication rates assessment by measuring the comprehensive complication index (CCI) on a scale from 0 (no complications) to 100 (death). Discharge (up to one week post-procedure),14 and 30 days follow-up
Secondary Post-procedure complication rates - Clavien-Dindo classification Post-procedure complication rates assessment by the Clavien-Dindo classification, which consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, Iva, Ivb and V, with V corresponding to death). Discharge (up to one week post-procedure),14 and 30 days follow-up
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT03691935 - Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB): in Patients Undergoing Surgery Through a Flank or Anterior Subcostal Incision. Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01093079 - Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy - Surgical and Oncological Outcomes N/A
Recruiting NCT04546230 - Low-Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia For Laparoscopic Nephrectomy. N/A
Completed NCT05596669 - Analgesic Effect of Ketamine Vs Ketamine Magnesium Infusion and Their Effect on Postoperative Morphine Consumption Phase 1
Enrolling by invitation NCT02287987 - CLamp vs Off Clamp Kidney During Partial Nephrectomy N/A
Terminated NCT01008709 - Comparison Study of Two Different Surgical Clips During Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00765232 - Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT03155295 - Simulated Surgery Rehearsal (MIPN)
Completed NCT04402749 - The Incidence of Pulmonary Embolism During Nephrectomy
Completed NCT01236326 - Conventional Laparoscopic Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation N/A
Completed NCT06119568 - Safety and Performance Assessment of a First Four Arms on Demand Open Robotic Solution for Assisted PN, RN and RP N/A
Completed NCT03324490 - Thoracic Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Nephrectomy in Obstructive/Restrictive Lung Disease Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06256120 - Effect of Fluid Regimen on Acute Kidney Injury N/A
Completed NCT03581539 - Comparing 3 Different Types of Pain Blocks After Laparoscopic Nephrectomy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03400085 - Pilot Study of an mHealth Intervention for Living Donor Follow-up N/A
Completed NCT03428633 - Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in Open Nephrectomy Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03090646 - Use of Financial Incentives to Increase Live Kidney Donor Follow-up Compliance N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05106218 - Assessment of the SurroundScope in Urologic Surgical Procedures N/A
Completed NCT01054469 - Transversus Abdominus Plane Block N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05149196 - Goal-directed Hemodynamic Management and Kidney Injury After Radical Nephrectomy N/A