Neoplasms Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluating the Impact of Patient-Centered Oncology Care
The National Committee for Quality Assurance has worked with the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Oncology Management Services, Independence Blue Cross, and RAND, as well as a broader multi-stakeholder advisory group, to define the Patient-Centered Oncology Care model. The purpose of this project was to pilot and evaluate this model. Specific research questions were: 1. Does Patient-Centered Oncology Care improve patient experiences and quality of care? Does it reduce undesirable events like emergency department visits and hospital stays? 2. How does adoption of Patient-Centered Oncology Care vary across a variety of practices and what factors affect adoption? The demonstration occurred in oncology practices in southeastern Pennsylvania. Practices received implementation support during the 24-month demonstration period. They were evaluated using patient surveys, quality measures, and measures of emergency department and hospital use. Results from these practices were compared in two ways: 1) with their performance before they became oncology medical homes and 2) with other similar practices.
Background. Advances in cancer treatment mean that a growing number of Americans are living with cancer and experiencing it as a chronic, long-term condition. National panels led by consumers have identified the need for improved cancer care in the areas of communication between providers and patients and their families, care planning, attention to nonmedical needs, care coordination and provision of evidence-based treatment. The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model of care is being widely adopted as a way to provide accessible, proactive, coordinated care and self-care through primary care practices. During active treatment for cancer, the oncology practice is often the primary setting supporting the patient and coordinating cancer treatment. By implementing the patient-centered medical home model, an innovative oncology practice in Pennsylvania has been able to improve access and reduce emergency department visits and hospitalizations for its patients. Objectives. Building on these recommendations and experience, the National Committee for Quality Assurance has worked with the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Oncology Management Services, Independence Blue Cross, and RAND, as well as a broader multi-stakeholder advisory group, to define the Patient-Centered Oncology Care model. We sought PCORI support to pilot and evaluate this model. Specific research questions were: 1. Does Patient-Centered Oncology Care improve patient experiences and quality of care? Does it reduce undesirable events like emergency department visits and hospital stays? 2. How does adoption of Patient-Centered Oncology Care vary across a variety of practices and what factors affect adoption? Methods. The demonstration occurred in 5 oncology practices in southeastern Pennsylvania. Practices received implementation support during the 24-month demonstration period. They were evaluated using patient surveys, quality measures, and measures of emergency department and hospital use. Results from these practices were compared in two ways: 1) with their performance before they became oncology medical homes and 2) with other similar practices. Patients, clinicians, and health plan leaders helped design the project, and disseminate results. The project used Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) resources efficiently by building on ongoing efforts. Our evaluation consisted of a retrospective, pre-post study design with a concurrent non-randomized control group of 18 local practices for the utilization and patient experience outcomes. We used difference-in-difference regression models that accounted for practice-level clustering and used functional forms appropriate to the dependent variables. For quality, we compared baseline and follow-up pilot practice performance to national and regional benchmark performance data. Patient Outcomes. People with cancer are seeking high quality, coordinated and supportive care. The Patient-Centered Oncology Model has the potential to address current gaps in cancer care. ;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03826043 -
THrombo-Embolic Event in Onco-hematology
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT03166631 -
A Trial to Find the Safe Dose for BI 891065 Alone and in Combination With BI 754091 in Patients With Incurable Tumours or Tumours That Have Spread
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT01938846 -
BI 860585 Dose Escalation Single Agent and in Combination With Exemestane or With Paclitaxel in Patients With Various Advanced and/or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06058312 -
Individual Food Preferences for the Mediterranean Diet in Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03308942 -
Effects of Single Agent Niraparib and Niraparib Plus Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-1) Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Participants
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06018311 -
Exercising Together for Hispanic Prostate Cancer Survivor-Caregiver Dyads
|
N/A | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT05431439 -
Omics of Cancer: OncoGenomics
|
||
| Completed |
NCT01343043 -
A Pilot Study of Genetically Engineered NY-ESO-1 Specific NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T in HLA-A2+ Patients With Synovial Sarcoma
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT01938638 -
Open Label Phase I Dose Escalation Study With BAY1143572 in Patients With Advanced Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05514444 -
Study of MK-4464 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors (MK-4464-001)
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT02292641 -
Beyond TME Origins
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT00954512 -
Study of Robatumumab (SCH 717454, MK-7454) in Combination With Different Treatment Regimens in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (P04722, MK-7454-004)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04958239 -
A Study to Test Different Doses of BI 765179 Alone and in Combination With Ezabenlimab in Patients With Advanced Cancer (Solid Tumors)
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04627376 -
Multimodal Program for Cancer Related Cachexia Prevention
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01222728 -
Using Positron Emission Tomography to Predict Intracranial Tumor Growth in Neurofibromatosis Type II Patients
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06004440 -
Real World Registry for Use of the Ion Endoluminal System
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05636696 -
COMPANION: A Couple Intervention Targeting Cancer-related Fatigue
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06035549 -
Resilience in East Asian Immigrants for Advance Care Planning Discussions
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06004466 -
Noninvasive Internal Jugular Venous Oximetry
|
||
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT02806557 -
Profiling Neutrophil Counts in Patients on Chemotherapy
|
N/A |