View clinical trials related to Neoplasms, Plasma Cell.
Filter by:This clinical study is an exploratory study, mainly to study the safety and efficacy of BCMA nano-antibody CAR-T in the treatment of MM. In this study, a 3 + 3 dose gradient climbing design was used. Three dosage groups, 5 x 106 / kg, 7.5 x 106 / kg and 1.5 x 107 / kg, were divided into three groups. Patients were enrolled in the sequence from low to high doses. When each dose group was completed, the next dose group could be enrolled if there was no more than 3-level toxicity or unpredictable severe toxicity. If the dose group had more than 3-level toxicity or unpredictable severe toxicity, two patients were enrolled to observe if there was any toxicity. Sexual occurrence, if two patients in each group developed grade 3 or more toxicity or unpredictable severe toxicity, the dose group was the dose-limiting group, and the dose group in front of the group was the maximum tolerated dose, at which the initial efficacy was observed. Nine patients were enrolled in the hill climbing test, and six patients were enrolled in the follow-up preliminary efficacy study, with an estimated 15 enrolled.
The phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide as maintenance therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who receive lenalidomide,bortezomib, and dexamethasone Combination as induction therapy.
This is a first-in-human study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of Bisthianostat in refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma patients.
This is a prospective, non-interventional, observational study. The purpose of this study is to collect data and bio-specimens that will support future research
Despite available therapies, MM uniformly fatal and participants who have received prior lenalidomide (Len) and bortezomib have a median overall survival (OS) of 9 months. Pomalidomide (Pom) plus low-dose dexamethasone (Dex) significantly improved efficacy parameters in terms of progression free survival (PFS), OS, and overall response (ORR) compared with high-dose Dex in participants with refractory or relapsed, and refractory MM, including participants with disease refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Alkylating agents also represent standard therapies for participants with MM. There are some reports demonstrating combination of Len and continuous cyclophosphamide (Cy) achieve an ORR of 50% in Len refractory participants, suggesting Cy may be able to overcome resistance to Len. The investigators aimed to assess the safety in Mexican MM participants in relapse/refractory stage of the triple combination: IV Cy in combination with Pom plus Dex until disease progression. A multicenter study is proposed. Primary endpoint: Safety. Efficacy as secondary endpoint: PF, OS and ORR.
This study is a multi-cohort, open-label, multicenter Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bb2121 in participants with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) (Cohort 1), in participants with RRMM who receive bridging therapy with talquetamab (Cohort 1b), in participants with multiple myeloma (MM) having progressed within 18 months of initial treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (Cohort 2a) and without ASCT (Cohort 2b) or, in participants with inadequate response post ASCT during initial treatment (Cohort 2c) and the efficacy and safety of bb2121 used in combination with lenalidomide maintenance in participants with suboptimal response post ASCT (Cohort 3). Approximately 264 participants will be enrolled into one of three cohorts. Cohort 1 (including cohort 1b) will enroll approximately 126 RRMM subjects with ≥ 3 prior anti-myeloma treatment regimens. Cohort 2a will enroll approximately 39 MM subjects, with 1 prior anti-myeloma therapy including ASCT and with early relapse. Cohort 2b will enroll approximately 39 MM subjects with 1 prior anti-myeloma therapy not including ASCT and with early relapse. Cohort 2c will enroll approximately 30 MM subjects with inadequate response to ASCT during their initial anti-myeloma therapy. The cohorts will start in parallel and independently. Cohort 3 will enroll approximately 30 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) participants with suboptimal response to ASCT.
Phase 2, single-arm, open, non-randomized, multicenter study of the SINE™ compound selinexor plus low-dose dexamethasone, in combination with bortezomib and daratumumab. 100 mg selinexor (on days 1, 8, 15 and 22), plus 40 mg dexamethasone (20 mg IV the day of daratumumab and selinexor and 20 mg oral administration the day after daratumumab and selinexor) both weekly as continuous therapy. Bortezomib will be given via subcutaneous at dose of 1.3 mg/m2 once weekly on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 during the cycles 1 to cycle 8, and on day 1 and day 15 of each cycle thereafter as continuous therapy. Daratumumab will be given via intravenous at dose of 16 mg/Kg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 (weekly) during the cycles 1 and 2, every two weeks (on days 1 and 15) during the cycles 3 to 6 and on day 1 of each cycle thereafter as continuous therapy. Patients may continue indefinitely and there is no maximum treatment duration
The work proposed herein aims to provide the first prospective, randomized comparative efficacy data between Melphalan and BEAM treatment regimen in the Multiple Myeloma (MM) patient population. The risk of such a study is deemed reasonable and ethical since: a) previous works have closely examined the safety and toxicity of the BEAM regimen and the doses to be delivered in this protocol are well below the toxicity levels; b) phase III trials of BEAM have provided reasonable data regarding the efficacy in lymphomas c) Early, retrospective data suggests that BEAM may be efficacious in MM however due to the lack of prospective controlled randomized clinical trial, there is adequate equipoise regarding its efficacy and moreover its comparative efficacy in relation to Melphalan and; D) there are known limitations in the standard-of-care for MM, Melphalan, namely, relatively low rates of complete response at the time of Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and poor progression free survival.
Study design: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre, open-label, phase III trial (with a single intervention registration phase). Primary Objectives The primary objectives of this study are to determine: - The impact on Depth of Response (DoR: less than VGPR versus VGPR or better) when salvage ASCT conditioning is augmented by the addition of a proteasome inhibitor - The influence of a consolidation and maintenance strategy on the Durability of Response (DuR:PFS) Secondary objectives The secondary objectives of this study are to determine: - Overall survival - Time to disease progression - The overall response rate following ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (ITD) re-induction - Time to next treatment - Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) - Duration of response - Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative rate post re-induction, post-ASCT and conversion after ITD consolidation - Engraftment kinetics - Toxicity and safety - Quality of life (QoL) Participant population (refer to protocol section 9 for a full list of eligibility criteria). - Relapsed MM (with measurable disease by IMWG criteria) previously treated with ASCT - First progressive disease (PD) at least 12 months since first ASCT, requiring therapy. - ECOG Performance Status 0-2 - Aged at least 18 years - Adequate full blood count and renal, hepatobiliary, pulmonary and cardiac function - Written informed consent Interventions: All participants will be registered at trial entry and will receive re-induction therapy with 4-6, 28-day cycles of ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (ITD), in order to reach maximum response. Participants who achieve at least stable disease (SD) will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either conventional ASCT (ASCTCon), using melphalan, or augmented ASCT (ASCTAug), using melphalan with ixazomib. All participants achieving or maintaining a minimal response (MR) or better following trial ASCT will undergo a second randomisation to consolidation and maintenance or no further treatment. Participants randomised to consolidation and maintenance will receive treatment as follows: consolidation with 2 cycles of ITD and maintenance with ixazomib until disease progression. Number of participants: 406 participants will be registered into the trial to allow 284 participants to be randomised at the first randomisation (R1) and 248 participants to be randomised at the second randomisation (R2).
Panobinostat is a potent oral histone deacetylase inhibitor that alters gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms and inhibits protein degradation. It was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) who have received ≥ 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug. A GEP-based histone acetylation score allowing identification of MM patients with a poor prognosis and who could benefit from HDACi treatment was recently reported(Moreaux et al. BJC. 2013). Our hypothesis is that the histone acetylation score could be promising to identify MM patients who could benefit from treatment with HDACi and the development of personalized treatment.