Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05155111 |
Other study ID # |
1781443 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 22, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
MaineHealth |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This is a clinical trial using telemedicine as an intervention twice in the first 6 hours of
life to assess neonatal encephalopathy, one of the key factors involved in the decision to
treat a neonate with therapeutic hypothermia (TH). The investigators aim to enroll up to 30
neonates, anticipating that there will be about 5 neonates, who do not demonstrate moderate
to severe neonatal encephalopathy, and therefore do not meet criteria for treatment with TH.
The investigators will prospectively follow the clinical course of all 30neonates through
monitoring with electroencephalogram (EEG) for up to 24 hours after birth to determine if
seizures are present and by MRI of the brain prior to hospital discharge to determine if
there is evidence of brain injury. Neonates will be enrolled in the study for the duration of
their hospital admission.
Description:
Neonatal encephalopathy is a clinically defined condition of disturbed neurological function
in an infant of greater than 35 weeks gestation. Neonatal encephalopathy is most likely to
occur following a traumatic birth that requires some degree of neonatal resuscitation.
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard-of-care neuroprotective therapy employed for
neonates who have symptoms of moderate to severe neonatal encephalopathy. Assessment of
neonatal encephalopathy can be challenging because the symptoms can fluctuate and because
there is time pressure to decide to initiate TH before the neonate is 6 hours old, after
which TH has almost no beneficial effect. Doctors struggle with the decision to treat
neonates with milder symptoms and these neonates are at risk for two possible adverse
outcomes; 1) an eligible neonate is not recognized and therefore not treated with TH or 2) an
ineligible neonate may receive unnecessary treatment. The first error is one that can result
in lifelong impairments such as learning delays, epilepsy and cerebral palsy for the
untreated child and the second error, of unnecessary treatment is costly, invasive and not
without risk of associated issues with morphine exposure, cold-induced injury to the skin or
complications from venous access such as infection or blood clot.
In Maine, the investigators have successfully implemented telemedicine both in the tertiary
care center and in the rural community hospital to permit visual evaluation of neonates and
inform joint decision making in these challenging instances. Telemedicine provides the
opportunity to have synchronous, unscheduled immediate expert consultation for neonatologists
with pediatric neurology in the tertiary care center and for primary care physicians with
both specialists in the community hospital setting. The objective of the present study is to
develop the telemedicine consultative network to continue to improve patient selection for
TH. The investigators aim to use telemedicine consults in three tertiary care centers (Maine
Medical Center, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center and the University of Vermont
Medical Center) to develop evidence for the threshold at which neonates can be safely
excluded from TH treatment. In Aim 1, the investigators will assess neonates with milder
symptoms at least twice in the first 6 hours of life and for those not meeting criteria for
moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy, perform electroencephalogram (EEG) to rule out
seizures and MRI of the brain to rule out injury. In aim 2, the investigators will compare
the interrater reliability between the neonatologist neonatal encephalopathy exam and the one
performed via telemedicine by the pediatric neurologist.