Nasolabial Fold Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing the Pain and the Safety Profile Associate With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Compared to Restylane Perlane
Verified date | August 2019 |
Source | Galderma R&D |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety in associated with injection of Restylane Perlane Lidocaine compared to Restylane Perlane using VAS scale
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 70 |
Est. completion date | January 16, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | January 16, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Signed and dated informed consent to participate in the study. - Men or women aged 20 years or older of Chinese origin. - Subjects willing to abstain from any other facial plastic surgical or cosmetic procedures below the level of the lower orbital rim for the duration of the study. - Intent to undergo correction of both nasolabial folds (NLF) with a wrinkle severity in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) of either grade 3 on both NLFs or grade 4 on both NLFs. Exclusion Criteria: - Previous tissue augmentation therapy or contouring with any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent filler, autologous fat, lifting threads or permanent implant below the level of the lower orbital rim. - Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy below the level of the lower orbital rim within 12 months before treatment. - Previous tissue revitalization treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy, radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryotherapy, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the midface within 6 months before treatment. - Scars or deformities, active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions near or in the area to be treated. - Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Taiwan | Kaohsiung Medical University | Kaohsiung | |
Taiwan | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Taipei | |
Taiwan | Taipei Medical University Hospital | Taipei |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Galderma R&D |
Taiwan,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at the time of injection.
VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler. |
At the time of injection | |
Secondary | Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection.
VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler. |
15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04128046 -
The Effect of Platelet-rich Fibrin Matrix on Skin Rejuvenation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03300466 -
A Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of GP0045 for Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01848717 -
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MINTLIFT® Group for Nasolabial Fold
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04534660 -
Preliminary Safety and Effectiveness of SMI-01 as a Tissue Filler
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04839484 -
LifeSprout Luminaâ„¢ Study in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04754646 -
RHA® 4 NLF Cannula
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844529 -
Evaluation of Collagen Dermal Filler With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02176356 -
Patient Satisfaction Study of Combined Facial Treatment With BOTOX® Cosmetic, JUVÉDERM® and LATISSE® (HARMONY Study)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02558283 -
A Safety and Efficacy Study of JUVÉDERM® VOLIFT® With Lidocaine and Restylane® for Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01775293 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Nasolabial Fold After Rhytidectomy Using Non-absorbable Mesh
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01585220 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Neuramis in Correction of Nasolabial Fold
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02918721 -
Pain and Safety of Restylane With and Without Lidocaine for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05294562 -
China Post-Market Clinical Follow-up of FACILLE®
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04957446 -
Histology Study of Biostimulatory Activity of Injectable Poly-L-Lactic Acid (Sculptra Aesthetic)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04569045 -
Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Sodium Hyaluronate When Used for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04224649 -
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With HARA as Compared to Restylane® Lidocaine in Temporary Correction of Nasolabial Folds
|
N/A |