Clinical Trials Logo

Nasal Septum Deviation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Nasal Septum Deviation.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04220853 Completed - Nasal Obstruction Clinical Trials

Changes in Nasal Airflow Parameters After Septoplasty and Turbinoplasty

Start date: October 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pathological-anatomical changes in the nasal cavity (nasal septum/perforation, mucosal hypertrophy) negatively affect nasal airflow, increase resistance - cause nasal obstruction and are often an indication for surgery. The aim of the study is to examine nasal airflow parameters after septoplasty and turbinoplasty .

NCT ID: NCT02026999 Completed - Clinical trials for Nasal Septum Deviation

Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine Use in Patients Undergoing Septoplasty Operations

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The purpose of this study to determine the effectiveness of sugammadex in septoplasty patients whose mask ventilation would be difficult after extubation.

NCT ID: NCT01869673 Completed - Clinical trials for Nasal Septum Deviation

A Comparison of the Face Mask and Oral Mask Ventilation After Nasal Surgery

Start date: June 2013
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Difficult mask ventilation is usually studied in relation to airway management and difficult intubation and mostly during the induction period of anesthesia. According to the closed claim reports tracheal extubation and recovery of anesthesia is associated with brain damage or death. Difficult mask ventilation can also be a problem during the emergence phase of anesthesia after extubation. Especially after nasal surgery the use of nasal tampon and casts can resemble upper airway obstruction and facial deformity and cause difficult mask ventilation. The effectiveness of ventilation is affected by the design of the mask. Leaks may develop due to the inability to obtain a tight seal. The use of an oral mask for ventilation in patients with nasal tumors and after rhinoplasty for patients with a nasal cast has been reported. This suggests that oral mask ventilation, rather than face mask ventilation, should be considered after nasal surgery. The aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare the face mask and oral mask ventilation after nasal surgery in terms of the mask ventilation classification, airway pressure, minute ventilation and tidal volume. Our hypothesis is that ventilation with oral mask would provide better airway pressures, superior mask-ventilation classification and higher tidal volumes compared to face mask ventilation in patients with obstructed nasal pasage (nasal packing and/or cast) after nasal surgery'.