Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02642991
Other study ID # CV-15-41
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2015
Est. completion date March 2016

Study information

Verified date November 2020
Source Coopervision, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study investigated the performance criteria over one week of daily wear to determine if the comfilcon A asphere lens (test) performed equivalently to the comfilcon A sphere (control) in terms of measurement and subjective ratings of visual performance.


Description:

This study was a prospective, single site, daily wear, double masked, randomized bilateral cross over dispensing study of binocular wear of comfilcon A asphere lens (test) and comfilcon A sphere lens (control) over 1 week of daily wear.


Other known NCT identifiers
  • NCT02642341
  • NCT02642354

Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 44
Est. completion date March 2016
Est. primary completion date January 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 35 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: - Oculo-visual examination in the last two years - Between 18 and 35 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer - Has read and understood the informed consent letter - Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule - Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/25 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or 20/20 best corrected - Currently wears, or has previously successfully worn, soft contact lenses between -1.00D (Diopoter) and -4.00D - Spherical Contact Lens Rx between -1.00 and -4.00 and spectacle cylinder <-0.75 - Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the initial visit - Has a subjective response at baseline, which indicates suitability for this study - Currently spends a minimum of 4 hours a day; 5 days a week on digital devices and can replicate this time during the study period - Is willing and able to wear the study contact lenses a minimum of 10 hours per day; 5 days a week Exclusion Criteria: A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: - Has never worn contact lenses before - Any systemic disease affecting ocular health - Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health - Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals or study products used in this study. - Has any ocular pathology or anomaly that would affect the wearing of the lenses - Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye - Is aphakic - Has anisometropia of >1.00 - Has undergone corneal refractive surgery - Has strabismus - Has any ocular amblyopia >= 1line of HC (High Contrast) Visual Acuity - Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study - Has previously participated in study of the Phenacite lenses

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Phenacite
contact lens
comfilcon A
contact lens

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario
United States University of California Berkeley California
United States CORL, Indiana University Bloomington Indiana

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Coopervision, Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Distance Visual Acuity (VA) - High Illumination Distance visual acuity High Illumination was assessed using logMAR Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Distance Visual Acuity (VA) - High Illumination Distance visual acuity High Illumination was assessed using logMAR 1 week
Primary Near Visual Acuity (VA) - High Illumination Near Visual Acuity (VA) - High Illumination assessed using logMAR Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Near Visual Acuity (VA) - High Illumination Near Visual Acuity (VA) - High Illumination assessed using logMAR 1 week
Primary Distance Visual Acuity (VA) - Low Illumination Distance Visual Acuity (VA) - Low Illumination assessed using logMAR Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Distance Visual Acuity (VA) - Low Illumination Distance Visual Acuity (VA) - Low Illumination assessed using logMAR 1 week
Primary Near Visual Acuity (VA) - Low Illumination Near Visual Acuity (VA) - Low illumination assessed using logMAR Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Near Visual Acuity (VA) - Low Illumination Near Visual Acuity (VA) - Low illumination assessed using logMAR 1 week
Primary Quality of Distance Vision Subjective scoring of Quality of Distance Vision assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Quality of Distance Vision Subjective scoring of Quality of Distance Vision assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) 1 week
Primary Quality of Near Vision Patient subjective scoring for quality of near vision using 0-100 continuous scale: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Quality of Near Vision Patient subjective scoring for quality of near vision using 0-100 continuous scale: 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time 1 week
Primary Quality of Vision With Digital Device Use Subjective scoring of Quality of Vision with digital device use assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Quality of Vision With Digital Device Use Subjective scoring of Quality of Vision with digital device use assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) 1 week
Primary Quality of Intermediate Vision Subjective scoring of Quality of Intermediate Vision assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Quality of Intermediate Vision Subjective scoring of Quality of Intermediate Vision assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) 1 week
Primary Overall Vision Quality Subjective scoring of overall vision quality assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Primary Overall Vision Quality Subjective scoring of overall vision quality assessed using 0-100 continuous scale: (0=extremely poor vision all of the time. 100=excellent vision all of the time) 1 week
Secondary Biomicroscopy Findings - Bulbar Hyperemia Bulbar hyperemia assessment using 5 categories: (0=None, 1= Slight injection to conjunctival vessels, 2= Mild injection, 3= Moderate injection, 4= Severe injection) in (0.25 steps) 1 week
Secondary Biomicroscopy Findings- Limbal Hyperemia Investigator assessment using 5 categories: (0=None, 1= Slight injection to conjunctival vessels, 2= Mild injection, 3= Moderate injection, 4= Severe injection) in (0.25 steps) 1 week
Secondary Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Staining Extent Investigator Assessment on Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Staining Extent on a scale of 0-4 : 0=No staining, 1=1-15% of area, 2=16-30% of area, 3=31-45% of area, 4= >45% of area 1 week
Secondary Ghosting - Distance Vision Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale:0=Intolerable;100=Not noticable 1 week
Secondary Ghosting - Near Vision Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale:0=Intolerable;100=Not noticable 1 week
Secondary Overall Comfort Patient subjective scoring using 0-100 continuous scale, 0= cannot be worn, 100= cannot be felt ever. Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Secondary Overall Comfort Patient subjective scoring for overall comfort using 0-100 continuous scale, 0= cannot be worn, 100= cannot be felt ever. 1 week
Secondary Overall Dryness Patient subjective scoring for overall dryness using 0-100 continuous scale, 0=cannot be worn, 100=no dryness experienced at any time. Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Secondary Overall Dryness Patient subjective scoring for overall dryness using 0-100 continuous scale, 0=cannot be worn, 100=no dryness experienced at any time. 1 week
Secondary Lens Preference - Overall Vision Preference Subjective rating of lens preference for overall vision preference (Phenacite, comfilcon A, No preference) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Ratings of Change in Frequency of Tiredness Subjective rating of change in eye fatigue frequency of tiredness assessed using Eye fatigue Experience Questionnaire (EFEG) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Ratings of Change in Severity of Tiredness Subjective rating of change in eye fatigue severity of tiredness assessed using Eye fatigue Experience Questionnaire (EFEG) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Ratings of Change in Bothersome Rating for Tiredness Subjective rating of change in eye fatigue bothersome rating for tiredness assessed using Eye fatigue Experience Questionnaire (EFEG) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Ratings of Change in Frequency of Dryness Subjective rating of change in eye fatigue frequency of dryness assessed using Eye fatigue Experience Questionnaire (EFEG) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Ratings of Change in Severity of Dryness Subjective rating of change in eye fatigue severity of dryness assessed using Eye fatigue Experience Questionnaire (EFEG) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Ratings of Change in Bothersome Rating of Dryness Subjective rating of change in eye fatigue bothersome rating for dryness assessed using Eye fatigue Experience Questionnaire (EFEG) 1 week
Secondary Subjective Questionnaire Response - Eye Strain Subjective questionnaire response for " My eyes don't feel strained while wearing these lenses" - Agree, Disagree 1 week
Secondary Subjective Questionnaire Response - Eye Feel Good Subjective questionnaire response for " These lenses make my eyes feel good" - Agree, Disagree 1 week
Secondary Subjective Questionnaire Response - Eye Feel Relaxed Subjective questionnaire response for " These lenses make my eyes feel relaxed" - Agree, Disagree 1 week
Secondary Subjective Questionnaire Response - Vision Subjective questionnaire response for " These lenses help my vision" - Agree, Disagree 1 week
Secondary Subjective Questionnaire Response - Eye Tired Subjective questionnaire response for " These lenses make my eyes feel less tired" - Agree, Disagree 1 week
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04923841 - Myopia Control Using Bright Light Therapy, Myopic Defocus and Atropine N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04080128 - Examination of Myopia Progression and Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05275959 - Beijing (Peking)---Myopia and Obesity Comorbidity Intervention (BMOCI) N/A
Completed NCT04604405 - Effects of 650nm Low Energy Light on Human Retina and Choroid Microcirculation N/A
Recruiting NCT05594719 - The Effect of Sun-like Spectrum With Different Spectrum Composition on Retinal Blood Flow N/A
Completed NCT05594732 - The Effects of Different Outdoor Light Exposure Modes on Retinal Blood Flow N/A
Completed NCT04492397 - Comparing The Performance Of Two Different Daily Disposable Lenses (MIKI) N/A
Completed NCT04536571 - Vision Stability and Preference for Soft Toric vs. Soft Spherical Contact Lenses N/A
Completed NCT06046209 - Comparing a Monthly Replacement Lens Versus a Daily Disposable Lens N/A
Recruiting NCT06344572 - Pivotal Study of SAT-001 in Treatment of Pediatric Patient With Myopia Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05611294 - Contralateral Study of Topography Guided LASIK Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction N/A
Completed NCT05656885 - Clinical Evaluation of Two Frequent Replacement Soft Spherical Contact Lenses N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05534022 - Clinical Evaluation of a Myopia Control Lens in Slowing Myopia Progression. N/A
Completed NCT03934788 - the Clinical Performance of the Oxysoft Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lens N/A
Completed NCT03701516 - Clinical Evaluation of Etafilcon A Contact Lenses Using a Novel Molding Process 2 N/A
Completed NCT05538754 - Post-Market Evaluation of the EVO ICL N/A
Completed NCT03139201 - Clinical Performance of the OxyAqua Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lens N/A
Completed NCT02555722 - Evaluation of the CooperVision, Inc. Fanfilcon A and Enfilcon A Daily Wear Contact Lenses When Used for Frequent Replacement for up to One (1) Month of Daily Wear N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06009458 - Acuity 200™ (Fluoroxyfocon A) Orthokeratology Contact Lens for Overnight Wear N/A
Recruiting NCT05548478 - Corneal Endothelial Cell Injury Induced by Mitomycin-C N/A