Myofascial Trigger Point Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effectiveness of Dry Needling Treatment in Patients Diagnosed With Dorsalgia Accompanied by Myofascial Pain Syndrome.
Back pain is commonly seen in the working-age population, with the peak occurrence around the age of 40. Its frequency does not increase with age and is not associated with age-related degenerative changes in the spine. Especially when the underlying cause is conditions such as myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), where regional muscle sensitivity in the rhomboid and trapezius areas is prominent, dry needling treatment has become increasingly popular and the subject of numerous studies in recent years. In the diagnosis of MPS, two valuable findings include the detection of a taut band upon palpation and the presence of trigger points in muscle fibers with mild finger pressure. The study we are planning involves a double-blind efficacy trial where real and sham dry needling procedures will be performed under ultrasound guidance, ensuring that both the patient and the evaluator are blinded. This study design has the potential to make a significant contribution to the literature in this field.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | June 25, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 25, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Clinically diagnosed with Dorsal Myofascial Pain Syndrome associated with rhomboid and trapezius trigger point. - Having a shoulder pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 6 or higher. - Ability to read and write Exclusion Criteria: - History of spinal surgery. - Lesions, atrophy, or scars in the skin around the back. - Undergoing physiotherapy targeting the back and lumbar region in the last 6 months. - Undergoing an interventional procedure for back or lumbar pain in the last 3 months. - Use of steroids in the last 1 month. - Special conditions such as epilepsy, pregnancy, injection phobia, etc. - Inability to comply with the restriction on the use of steroid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the treatment period. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Kutahya Health Sciences University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Visual Analog Scale | "Visual Analog Scale (VAS)" is a measurement instrument often used in healthcare to assess the intensity or characteristics of subjective experiences such as pain. It typically consists of a straight line, usually 10 centimeters in length, with endpoints representing extremes (e.g., "no pain" to "worst imaginable pain"). Patients mark on the line to indicate their subjective experience, and the distance from one endpoint provides a numerical score representing the intensity of the sensation being measured. The VAS is commonly employed in pain assessment but can also be adapted for various other subjective evaluations. | [Time Frame: Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: Up to 24 hour before the second intervention, Time frame 3: One week after the last intervention, Time frame 4: One month after the last intervention] | |
Primary | Patient-Specific Functional Scale | "Patient-Specific Functional Scale" (PSFS). The PSFS is a self-report outcome measure commonly used in healthcare, particularly in physical therapy and rehabilitation settings. It is designed to assess the patient's perceived difficulty in performing specific activities that are relevant to their daily life and function. Identification of Activities: The patient is asked to identify and list three to five activities that they find challenging or have difficulty performing due to their condition or symptoms. Rating Scale: For each identified activity, the patient is asked to rate their current level of difficulty on a numerical scale, often ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates no difficulty, while 10 indicates the maximum difficulty. Follow-up Assessments: The same activities and rating scale are used in follow-up assessments to track changes over time or in response to interventions. | [Time Frame: Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: Up to 24 hour before the second intervention, Time frame 3: One week after the last intervention, Time frame 4: One month after the last intervention] | |
Primary | Pressure Pain Threshold Measurement | "Pressure Pain Threshold Measurement" refers to the assessment of the amount of pressure applied to a specific point on the body before the individual perceives it as painful. This measurement is commonly used in clinical settings to evaluate pain sensitivity and threshold. The process involves gradually applying pressure to a specific area until the individual signals that they begin to feel pain. It is a quantitative way to assess pain perception and is often utilized in research, physical therapy, and other healthcare disciplines to understand pain levels and responses. | [Time Frame: Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: Up to 24 hour before the second intervention, Time frame 3: One week after the last intervention, Time frame 4: One month after the last intervention | |
Secondary | What does Oswestry stand for? The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | What does Oswestry stand for? The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a common questionnaire used to evaluate functional outcomes and physical functioning in patients with acute or chronic low back pain. This questionnaire yields a subjective percentage score that grades the level of physical function or disability. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is calculated based on each score of the ODQ, which consists of ten items. Each of the ten items is scored from 0 to 5, and the total is added and multiplied by 2. Therefore, the ODI ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score on the ODI indicates a more severe disability caused by LBP. | [Time Frame: Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: One week after the last intervention, Time frame 3: One month after the last intervention] | |
Secondary | The 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) | The SF-12v2 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). What is the maximum score for SF-12? Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning | [Time Frame: Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: One week after the last intervention, Time frame 3: One month after the last intervention] |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06029413 -
Myo vs. Myofascial Injection for Myofascial Trigger Points
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04985578 -
Effects on Muscle Activity After Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points of the Gastrocnemius Muscles
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05546203 -
Trigger Point Treatment in Chronic Pelvic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06258070 -
Clinical Performance of Therapeutic Use of BTX for Bruxism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04531306 -
An Analysis of Kinesio® Tape on Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Iliotibial Band
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03708107 -
Percutaneous Microelectrolysis (MEP) Versus Ischemic Compression in Miofascial Trigger Points
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913976 -
Changes on Pain and Range of Motion by the Use of Kinesio Taping in Patients Diagnosed With Cervical Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913963 -
Changes on Pain and Range of Motion by the Use of Kinesio Taping in Subjects With Myofascial Trigger Point
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04719689 -
Comparison of Dry Needling and Dry Cupping in Positional Fault of Pelvis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05792111 -
Caudal Epidural Steroid and Trigger Point Injection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03704311 -
Evaluation of Mitochondrial Function in Myofascial Trigger Points Cohort Pilot Study Using High-resolution Respirometry
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05429827 -
The Therapeutic Effects of Dextrose Injection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05151510 -
Trigger Point Injections Versus Lidocaine Patch for Myofascial Pain in the Emergency Department
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05396196 -
An Analysis of Kinesio® Tape With Manual Fascial Glide Application on Trigger Points in The Iliotibial Band
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05664165 -
The Efficiency of Dry Needling and Cold Spray-stretching Treatments
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01250184 -
Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome With Lidocaine Injection and Physical Therapy.
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03941054 -
Myosfascial Trigger-Points and Effects on Neuromuscular Response
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04993118 -
Integration of Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique On Trapezius Trigger Points.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04851743 -
Effects on Neuromuscular Function After Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points in the Gastrocnemius Muscles
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06013644 -
Acupuncture, Dry Needle and Botox Injection in Management of Patient With Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome
|
Early Phase 1 |